- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,326
- 3,613
Not a business guy by any means, but how is it possible that 22 of 30 teams were losing money when the lockout happened
When you say "losing money" what does that really look like, is it as black and white as it sounds? I just find that so bizarre
I'm not sure, but I have a mentor who use to be a minority owner for the Grizz before new ownership took over. He's out of it now because he said it was one of the worst investments he ever made. I'm not sure if the same thing goes for the majority owners, but I assume its true. He told me that you don't invest in a basketball team for the profit, you do it because you enjoy the game of basketball and the perks. This may not be true for every majority/minority owner, but that's what he told me.
If you love basketball and a billionaire owner, what's losing money to you if you are at least able to profit off your other businesses? If your net profit ends up being a lot more (most billionaires have at least 5 streams of income or more), you are doing ok . If it was as bad as written, I think more owners would be willing to sell more than anything. That's if the "losing money" thing is true.
Last edited: