- 43,666
- 8,675
I don't understand the comparison between AD and T-Rich either
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by DoubleJs07
I got Lamar Miller going #28 to GB.
Also, I think it's absolutely foolish to take a RB in the top 5/10 unless he has the skill-set of AD. I think Richardson is a fantastic player, but in today's NFL, taking a RB that high is very risky.
*Buc Em...if the Bucs traded back and took a RB like Miller in the late-teens/early-20's, how much of a drop off in production (as a 1-2 punch) would a miller/blount combo have in comparison to a richardson/blount pairing?
Originally Posted by 651akathePaul
Watching Tannehill's workout, I can't help but see a little Tarvaris Jackson in him. Has the arm, but throws with nice touch. Mobile, but you don't see him lighting teams up with his legs. Throw that in with his gameplay in being a tad slow on decision making and that's Tarvaris!Uh-oh.
i'm hoping next year, when there should be a slew of good QBs coming out, that a perfect storm happens for the eagles..Originally Posted by theone2401
This QB premium is out of control and its going to get worse as teams adjust to the rookie wage scale and the league turns into a pass heavy league.
Portis is a good comparison for Miller, hadn't thought of that mostly because Portis hasn't resembled that version of himself in so many years.Originally Posted by theone2401
They say Trent actually ran 4.46 and 4.51.
Lamar Miller is Denver Broncos Clinton Portis with better long speed
Trent Richardson is Jonathan Stewart hopefully more durable
David Wilson has huge future bum potential he has no vision.
Chris Polk is good also.
Originally Posted by 5am6oody72
Portis is a good comparison for Miller, hadn't thought of that mostly because Portis hasn't resembled that version of himself in so many years.Originally Posted by theone2401
They say Trent actually ran 4.46 and 4.51.
Lamar Miller is Denver Broncos Clinton Portis with better long speed
Trent Richardson is Jonathan Stewart hopefully more durable
David Wilson has huge future bum potential he has no vision.
Chris Polk is good also.
As far as Wilson goes, I don't really know of anybody I would compare him to other than maybe a slower McFadden. His running style is just odd and his vision/patience is just terrible at times. He isn't that shifty but he has superb leg drive and runs through tackles better than anybody I've seen at his size (though I'm not sure that will be a sustainable running style in the league). He gets a ton of YAC from having insane balance and power after contact, but he probably leaves just as many yards on the field by missing easy reads and failing to set up his blockers. If he can ever develop his vision and patience he could be a great player, but I don't think he will contribute much early.
A right tackle would be a premium, being that your QB is a lefty, no?Originally Posted by itsaboutthattime
well there goes us taking the best player available..
we dont have a shot at kalil.. and riley is more of a right tackle.. hmmmm
Originally Posted by dreClark
A right tackle would be a premium, being that your QB is a lefty, no?Originally Posted by itsaboutthattime
well there goes us taking the best player available..
we dont have a shot at kalil.. and riley is more of a right tackle.. hmmmm
Originally Posted by AG 47
^He totally did sound bitter, but at the same time, his criticisms were on point. Especially as it relates to the Shanahan's and the ******** as an organization. I like him in the media...I think he'd balance out the Bruschi's and such of the media world, as long as the subject doesn't revolve around Donovan.