- 2,784
- 610
- Joined
- Jun 23, 2008
Then you just hate cops if you don't see the difference between a cop getting shot in the head trying to protect others (assuming it is a non-crooked cop) and some average joe dying from lets say a heart attack
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Dude was so spun on PCP that striking him hard with nightsticks did nothing to him. It was like hitting him with a wiffle ball bat.Wasn't my dude Rodney king high as hell tho
I think we gon have to keep waitingSame here
I'm still waiting on and explanation ofhow resisting would have helpedthe need for deadly force...
Shame what this place has become.
Shame what this place has become.
Staten Island or NT?
what's stopping you?I would love to be on some vigilante type life and just snipe all these crooked cops when they are saying bye to their wives in the morning.
Pieces of doodoo, got a million and one dangerous crimes and criminals that are actually harming society and they out here being tough guys on the weak and innocent.
F em all.
ACAB
ACAB
ACAB
ACAB
Wish I can catch one with out their badge on and uniform willing to fight.
America the land of the revolutionaries and yet they have become the most complacent nation with regards to government and society
Does everyone see how different the two situations are though?
The fact remains anyone who hates the police has something to hide.
http://www.nydailynews.com/new-york...-garner-stripped-shield-gun-article-1.1873033
New video shows the aftermath a little clearer. The cop with the choke hold and green shirt waves at the camera after standing around shooting the **** with other officers after he killed that man. (end of video). Another lies and say he's breathing after no CPR attempts. Disgusting. Thugs with guns.
I had one tell my groups of friends last night, and I quote, "I am the law".
"Captain hindsight"
Sorry bud but its common sense and shouldn't require hindsight.
He was perfectly sober it appeared and obviously he knew he had a medical condition and wasn't in the best of health... If he really did nothing wrong, then he'd take a ride to the station and be released without suffering a major health complication. But no, he decided to fight back when a half dozen cops were standing right there.
I'm not saying they didn't do anything wrong here, as I'm sure most of you are assuming.
My entire point is that if a cop is about to put you in cuffs, just let them. Otherwise you're creating a whole new set of problems for yourself.
Under NO CIRCUMSTANCE should they have the ability to restrain you to a point that would effect your health. That is the point, also why would i be willing to be criminalized embarrased and treated like a criminal if i know i did nothing wrong in the first place. Why is there five cops jumping on a man in the first place.
i dig...I'm for knowing your rights, but you take an officers life your not making it to the court house.
Yea good luck with that...For all you folks that's on that "you should just let w cop detain you unnecessarily...
Posted on Tariq Nasheeds page this morning...
Check it out...“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.
“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
I don't think its alright for a cop to harass you but I do know that you aren't doing yourself any favors by fighting back if they're trying to detain you.I'm just@ folks who just feel it's aight for cops to harass you....
You and I both know those laws don't apply to black people. But try it out and tell us how it goes.For all you folks that's on that "you should just let w cop detain you unnecessarily...
Posted on Tariq Nasheeds page this morning...
Check it out...“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.
“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).
I don't think anyone in here ever said it was alright for cops to harass people.I'm justI'm for knowing your rights, but you take an officers life your not making it to the court house.@ folks who just feel it's aight for cops to harass you....
You think a white man isn't going to have 5* GTA wanted level after killing a cop during an "unlawful arrest"? Race has nothing to do with it, if you kill a cop in that situation, you're 100% toast.You and I both know those laws don't apply to black people. But try it out and tell us how it goes.For all you folks that's on that "you should just let w cop detain you unnecessarily...
Posted on Tariq Nasheeds page this morning...
Check it out...“Citizens may resist unlawful arrest to the point of taking an arresting officer's life if necessary.” Plummer v. State, 136 Ind. 306. This premise was upheld by the Supreme Court of the United States in the case: John Bad Elk v. U.S., 177 U.S. 529. The Court stated: “Where the officer is killed in the course of the disorder which naturally accompanies an attempted arrest that is resisted, the law looks with very different eyes upon the transaction, when the officer had the right to make the arrest, from what it does if the officer had no right. What may be murder in the first case might be nothing more than manslaughter in the other, or the facts might show that no offense had been committed.”
“An arrest made with a defective warrant, or one issued without affidavit, or one that fails to allege a crime is within jurisdiction, and one who is being arrested, may resist arrest and break away. lf the arresting officer is killed by one who is so resisting, the killing will be no more than an involuntary manslaughter.” Housh v. People, 75 111. 491; reaffirmed and quoted in State v. Leach, 7 Conn. 452; State v. Gleason, 32 Kan. 245; Ballard v. State, 43 Ohio 349; State v Rousseau, 241 P. 2d 447; State v. Spaulding, 34 Minn. 3621.
“When a person, being without fault, is in a place where he has a right to be, is violently assaulted, he may, without retreating, repel by force, and if, in the reasonable exercise of his right of self defense, his assailant is killed, he is justified.” Runyan v. State, 57 Ind. 80; Miller v. State, 74 Ind. 1.
“These principles apply as well to an officer attempting to make an arrest, who abuses his authority and transcends the bounds thereof by the use of unnecessary force and violence, as they do to a private individual who unlawfully uses such force and violence.” Jones v. State, 26 Tex. App. I; Beaverts v. State, 4 Tex. App. 1 75; Skidmore v. State, 43 Tex. 93, 903.
“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery. The person so attempted to be restrained of his liberty has the same right to use force in defending himself as he would in repelling any other assault and battery.” (State v. Robinson, 145 ME. 77, 72 ATL. 260).
“Each person has the right to resist an unlawful arrest. In such a case, the person attempting the arrest stands in the position of a wrongdoer and may be resisted by the use of force, as in self- defense.” (State v. Mobley, 240 N.C. 476, 83 S.E. 2d 100).
“One may come to the aid of another being unlawfully arrested, just as he may where one is being assaulted, molested, raped or kidnapped. Thus it is not an offense to liberate one from the unlawful custody of an officer, even though he may have submitted to such custody, without resistance.” (Adams v. State, 121 Ga. 16, 48 S.E. 910).