District of Columbia
formerly dcmade
- Mar 17, 2013
- 8,312
- 3,977
Too convuluted imo. We already have a overload of Storylines going on now and that's without LS, Griff and Quentyn
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
After this season aren't there only 10 episodes left? Introducing young griff would've added more to an already overflowed plate.
To be completely honest its more about the hypocrisy you dudes are showing more so if hes dead or alive. If jon jadnt been resurrected yet yall would still be on the... "hes coming back because thats how its suppose to be and evidence shows..."
After seeing/reading him confirmed dead.
Hypocrites.
You guys also still realize the Baratheons hold the crown. Meaninf stannis is still the rightful heir.
The people in the north may not wanr anything to do with westeros but they also have no ruler. Jon doesnt want to be. Im sure sansa will still bend the knee. Meaning stannis is still the one who can unite the 7 kingdoms. Yall are forcing in your minds his story should end but this also doesnt have to be the case. He is not 100% useless as some of yall may think. And with no sons hes the only one who can legitimize any of roberts bastards. To continue the baratheon line.
Now yea we know it may be a baron wasteland by the end of the book but he still can serve purpose whether yall like it or not
Yes according to the books that is correct. It was signed Ramsay Bolton Trueborn Lord of Wintertell tho.Since this is the book thread & with your statement.
JON is dead and Stannis is rumored to be dead through the pink letter to which we dont know who is from. The pink letter in the book didnt have the bolton seal.
^ the point is you argue to separate the show and book, but used book evidence to support your, at the time, baseless belief that Jon would come back.
Why is it then senseless for TDogg (and others) to use book evidence to reason that the intent of the show writers is for us to question whether or not Stannis is actually dead.
If you want to use show only evidence, the same argument stands.
Hence, the hypocrisy.
Did you miss the part where I said WE. And at what time are you referring to? Do you have the exact quote? The whole comment about Jon Snow was an example.^ the point is you argue to separate the show and book, but used book evidence to support your, at the time, baseless belief that Jon would come back.
Why is it then senseless for TDogg (and others) to use book evidence to reason that the intent of the show writers is for us to question whether or not Stannis is actually dead.
If you want to use show only evidence, the same argument stands.
Hence, the hypocrisy.
I still personally think books will be completely different despite what grrm said. I think he said what he said to keep viewership up. That means $$$$$
Views would be up regardless i know. But u know a lot of book loyalist werent going to watch. And keeps people wanting more
I mean dude not even done writing wow from what we know. His brain can decide to go a completely different way
I have been sullied. I am ashamed of myself.