- 43,228
- 28,422
Please stop posting this *****, man.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I say all that to say this, be skeptical of what they’re presenting, of what CTG has said in the past, and what has been proven in the court of law. There’s definitely some posturing on Star’s end because this stuff is being presented without explanation, and an audience who doesn’t have a good understanding of what these legal documents can easily be mislead.
Repped; on point.You guys have to be cognizant of the documents that they’re presenting in that Star video.
For example, Jessica states that CTG claimed it was consensual, and at the 3 minute mark, they show the Grand Jury document that reads “Convened on August 29, 2001 the grand jurors of Berkeley county present upon their oath that Lenard L McKelvey did in Berkeley County on or about the eighth day of June 2001 willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously engaged in Pennell vaginal intercourse with the 15-year-old female”
A) That document is an affidavit, which is just the written allegation of what the court is trying to prove. Not a verdict of guilt.
B) That document was presented to a grand jury, not a jury of your peers. A grand jury’s duty is to simply determine whether there is enough evidence at the present time to proceed with the charges against a person. In this case, the evidence could have been medical records and the victim’s recount of what she remembered from the night.
I say all that to say this, be skeptical of what they’re presenting in this Star video, of what CTG has said in the past, and what has been proven in the court of law. There’s definitely some posturing on Star’s end because this stuff is being presented without explanation, and an audience who doesn’t have a good understanding of what these legal documents can easily be mislead.
You guys have to be cognizant of the documents that they’re presenting in that Star video.
For example, Jessica states that CTG claimed it was consensual, and at the 3 minute mark, they show the Grand Jury document that reads “Convened on August 29, 2001 the grand jurors of Berkeley county present upon their oath that Lenard L McKelvey did in Berkeley County on or about the eighth day of June 2001 willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously engaged in Pennell vaginal intercourse with the 15-year-old female”
A) That document is an affidavit, which is just the written allegation of what the court is trying to prove. Not a verdict of guilt.
B) That document was presented to a grand jury, not a jury of your peers. A grand jury’s duty is to simply determine whether there is enough evidence at the present time to proceed with the charges against a person. In this case, the evidence could have been medical records and the victim’s recount of what she remembered from the night.
I say all that to say this, be skeptical of what they’re presenting in this Star video, of what CTG has said in the past, and what has been proven in the court of law. There’s definitely some posturing on Star’s end because this stuff is being presented without explanation, and an audience who doesn’t have a good understanding of what these legal documents can easily be mislead.
I was gonna say something similar, I’m assuming you’ve either worked in the legal field/court system or been out here fighting cases
Everything you said is 100% correct tho
You guys have to be cognizant of the documents that they’re presenting in that Star video.
For example, Jessica states that CTG claimed it was consensual, and at the 3 minute mark, they show the Grand Jury document that reads “Convened on August 29, 2001 the grand jurors of Berkeley county present upon their oath that Lenard L McKelvey did in Berkeley County on or about the eighth day of June 2001 willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously engaged in Pennell vaginal intercourse with the 15-year-old female”
A) That document is an affidavit, which is just the written allegation of what the court is trying to prove. Not a verdict of guilt.
B) That document was presented to a grand jury, not a jury of your peers. A grand jury’s duty is to simply determine whether there is enough evidence at the present time to proceed with the charges against a person. In this case, the evidence could have been medical records and the victim’s recount of what she remembered from the night.
I say all that to say this, be skeptical of what they’re presenting in this Star video, of what CTG has said in the past, and what has been proven in the court of law. There’s definitely some posturing on Star’s end because this stuff is being presented without explanation, and an audience who doesn’t have a good understanding of what these legal documents can easily be mislead.
Bunch of lipstick alley broads in here. Mans explained the story 100s of times and y'all still in here salivating on hearing it again. Go look up an old video. Some of y'all look don't mind feeding into ****ery just as long as it gives y'all something to talk about even though you may know it's fake.
Sounds like some deep hate right there.Running up in here on some ya'll better stop talking about my man. **** that raccoon. We and I owe him absolutely nothing.
There’s no middle tho.All I know is based on the sleezy, cringe worthy comments he makes to women up there sometimes, I wouldn't be surprised if it did happen back then. We're talking about a dude who brags about sniffing the chair that J-lo sat in after she got up.
She's been consistently telling the same story for years and isn't out for money so I don't see someone putting themselves out there publicly just to lie. The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle of both stories though.
Brasi season coming
There’s no middle tho.
I never knew the girl was 15. That’s foul. I hope it’s not true for everyone’s sake but 15 and 22 just doesn’t sound good.
Sounds like some deep hate right there.
Bruh was out here killing R Kelly for being with a 19 year old.
Chickens coming home to roost.
naaaah we aint know she was 15He’s addressed already though
naaaah we aint know she was 15
Yup. I never did the math but I always thought he was like 18-19 when this happened and the chick was maybe 16-17.naaaah we aint know she was 15
plus he said the girl LIED on him
he told a very different story
than what the girl is sayin