- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
which plays ALL day way into self defense...which gave Zimmerman a RIGHT to shoot to kill.
this thread is flooded with folks who aren't playing straight clueless on this.
R.I.P Trayvon
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by shoefreakbaby,
- Start date
this thread is flooded with folks who aren't playing straight clueless on this.
- Aug 8, 2007
- 12,264
- 51
legally- yes, morally......
That isn't the same thing as saying TM swung first. Speculation you preaching as fact
Last edited:
- Feb 22, 2007
- 20,236
- 4,230
There is no proof that Trayvon Martin attacked George Zimmerman first
Anybody who says this, is making up stuff based on the current facts of the case
Anybody who says this, is making up stuff based on the current facts of the case
Last edited:
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
he DID swing first...da fat chick who was da PROSECUTION'S witness said so.legally- yes, morally......
That isn't the same thing as saying TM swung first. Speculation you preaching as fact
son said speculation...
[h1]Rachel Jeantel: ‘I Believe Trayvon Hit First’[/h1]
- Aug 8, 2007
- 12,264
- 51
Do you even read your own sources?
Though it’s impossible to prove that Martin threw the first punch, there has been much debate about who initiated the fight that led Zimmerman to use his firearm, which he says was in self-defense.
However, it should be noted that Jeantel did not testify that she believed Martin “hit first.”
Zimmerman was recently acquitted on murder and manslaughter charges in the death of Martin.
Though it’s impossible to prove that Martin threw the first punch, there has been much debate about who initiated the fight that led Zimmerman to use his firearm, which he says was in self-defense.
However, it should be noted that Jeantel did not testify that she believed Martin “hit first.”
Zimmerman was recently acquitted on murder and manslaughter charges in the death of Martin.
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
da FACT OF DA MATTER WAS TRAYVON was WHIPPIN ZIMMERMAN'S *** which LEAD TO HIM BLASTING HIM.
thats TEXT BOOK self defense.
ya ****** dont get that thru ya skulls?
- Feb 22, 2007
- 20,236
- 4,230
She said Zimmerman grabbed Martin first
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
da prosecution put this up...
da jury deemed trayvon hitting zimmerman first as credible since evidence proved that trayvon was on top beating da **** outta him...
this is how da case was won, everything else in here crying and whining...like jesus we ALL agree that he should've FOUGHT back trayvon instead
of pulling his gun, but he was WELL WITHIN his right to do so.
- Aug 23, 2003
- 7,122
- 1,149
- Mar 28, 2009
- 18,488
- 6,333
Why are y'all arguing with this dude? Dude is lost
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
meanwhile george zimmerman was found not guilty for reasons stated above...so ask i you, who's really lost?
get a ******g clue b.
you got idiots crying about da stand your ground laws and da court decision was ABOUT SELF DEFENSE...talk about a lack of comprehension.
- Feb 22, 2007
- 20,236
- 4,230
That video is just a George Zimmerman's recording of his version of what happened, its not proof
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
IT WAS SUBMITTED AS EVIDENCE FROM DA PROSECUTION....AKA IT WAS PROOF
do i have to post da grass stain evidence that showed trayvon martin on top washing up zimmerman too? damn....
this thread has reached a point where people here SEE da evidence, and DO NOT WANT TO ACCEPT IT.
- Feb 22, 2007
- 20,236
- 4,230
They submitted it to show the inconsistencies between this statement and the video tape
- Jun 2, 2013
- 66
- 12
GZ had a semi auto pistol, not a revolver. So that means he had to cock it in order to fire it. So either he already had 1 in the chamber when he approached Trayvon with the gun out ready to shoot or he wasnt really in the position he said he was when he fired. No way would he have been able to reach over and cock that pistol if he was getting handled like he claimed.
- Oct 8, 2005
- 9,953
- 7,147
stand your ground had a part in the verdict. it changed the description of self defense.meanwhile george zimmerman was found not guilty for reasons stated above...so ask i you, who's really lost?
get a ******g clue b.
you got idiots crying about da stand your ground laws and da court decision was ABOUT SELF DEFENSE...talk about a lack of comprehension.
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
that worked out well huh?
not only did it make it so zimmerman didn't NEED to take da stand, it gave da point of trayvon hitting first credibility
so it WAS proof.
- Jun 9, 2011
- 1,327
- 186
Zimmy used a gun against someone who was unarmed. Plain and simple.
Oh no, my husband slapped me around. Bang bang. It was self defense.
That's technically self defense too, does that make it ok for the wife to shoot the husband?
So in this case where the woman fired warning shots, would she have been let go for shooting him? She did the right thing and fired warning shots, that's what that idiot Zimmerman should have done. His ***** *** wasn't going to die by a beating. He was no where near death or to the point where he needed to use a gun. ***** could have hit back, I didn't see any bruises in those pictures of Trayvons body.
Oh no, my husband slapped me around. Bang bang. It was self defense.
That's technically self defense too, does that make it ok for the wife to shoot the husband?
So in this case where the woman fired warning shots, would she have been let go for shooting him? She did the right thing and fired warning shots, that's what that idiot Zimmerman should have done. His ***** *** wasn't going to die by a beating. He was no where near death or to the point where he needed to use a gun. ***** could have hit back, I didn't see any bruises in those pictures of Trayvons body.
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
once trayvon was beating him down zimmerman had DA RIGHT TO SHOOT HIM, ya dont like that fact? move out da united states.
dont pick fights with people who are legally armed.
dont pick fights with people who are legally armed.
- Jan 11, 2013
- 18,115
- 11,770
legally, GZ can be as racist and prejudiced as he wants to be. THE LAW will side in his favor. you can kill, and its the victim's fault. do the facts of this case sound about right?
- Jan 11, 2013
- 18,115
- 11,770
this is his point. in america, they have right to kill you for being black, so if you dont want to die, leave.
Last edited:
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
Where is this racist evidence at?
All this race bull **** clouds logic & common sense.
- Jul 18, 2012
- 32,800
- 19,699
i know it's been expressed many times over on nt, but this ninjahood character has to be one of the most ignorant posters on this site. it's sad, really
i wouldn't be so quick to offer up opinions if i possessed such limited capacities
i wouldn't be so quick to offer up opinions if i possessed such limited capacities
- Jan 11, 2013
- 18,115
- 11,770
wheres the evidence? prior phone calls to 911?
yet we still say "no one really knows" what he was thinking so we'll just believe its not true and hes not racist, he just killed a black boy to protect his neighborhood from "theives"....
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,049
- 24,223
Sure, lets attack character instead of facts...that
ALWAYS WORKS here
Fact: Trayvon HIT Zimmerman first
Fact: Zimmerman has da right to defend himself
Fact: not guilty verdict rendered by a jury of his
Peers. Everything else here is race spewing bull ****.
Trayvon shouldn't of picked a fight wit a armed dude.
Similar threads
