- 270
- 10
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2009
First off, i'd like to say hi to everyone here. This is my first time posting, but i've been reading the forums for a little while now. I have aquestion about the quality of retro'd Jordans. I've seen quite a few people say that older retros are a much better buy due to them being made withbetter materials. My question was, how big of an issue is the problem? I've accumulated a pretty nice collection in the past year or so, and i've neverbeen able to see anything visibly shoddy about them. Maybe i'm not discriminating enough, or I have nothing to compare them to.
For example: I've got a pair of Olympic 6s, Burgundy 5s, and Nubuck 12s. They seem perfectly fine.
I was thinking of getting a couple of pairs soon, like the Grapes and Aquas.
Is the quality problem big enough to just go ahead and hunt for the older retros and OGs? I don't want to waste my money on something that will fall aparton me easily.
For example: I've got a pair of Olympic 6s, Burgundy 5s, and Nubuck 12s. They seem perfectly fine.
I was thinking of getting a couple of pairs soon, like the Grapes and Aquas.
Is the quality problem big enough to just go ahead and hunt for the older retros and OGs? I don't want to waste my money on something that will fall aparton me easily.