- 113
- 10
Has Anyone made a comparison yet... i have the Og 360 bb's and the impact protection is second to non.. but id like to know how these feel against the new360 employed in the LeBron 7.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by swingshot
From the very onset, i will admit my foot hasn't been in the Lebron VII yet.
It has been in the 360. Whilst i can't fault the cushioning, it's way too high off the ground.
Around 04.50 Petrie talks about "Cushlon", an "upgraded" "lighter" "more responsive" verison of Phylon.
No beef with Petrie, he's very talented, but this reeks of Nike marketing hype.
The Original 360s bags were made in the US, then shipped to Asia.
The shoes those air bags were used in didn't have any Phylon.
The Air Max 2009 however does appear to have some sort of Phylon derivative, people
have spoken about how the cushioning breaks down fairly quickly.
Yet at the same time, Nike are telling us that the Phylon in the Lebron VII is improved somehow.
All i can see is they've stopped the US made 360 bags because it's cheaper to produce smaller bags
in Asia and pad out the rest of the shoe with Phylon.
Originally Posted by swingshot
From the very onset, i will admit my foot hasn't been in the Lebron VII yet.
It has been in the 360. Whilst i can't fault the cushioning, it's way too high off the ground.
Around 04.50 Petrie talks about "Cushlon", an "upgraded" "lighter" "more responsive" verison of Phylon.
No beef with Petrie, he's very talented, but this reeks of Nike marketing hype.
The Original 360s bags were made in the US, then shipped to Asia.
The shoes those air bags were used in didn't have any Phylon.
The Air Max 2009 however does appear to have some sort of Phylon derivative, people
have spoken about how the cushioning breaks down fairly quickly.
Yet at the same time, Nike are telling us that the Phylon in the Lebron VII is improved somehow.
All i can see is they've stopped the US made 360 bags because it's cheaper to produce smaller bags
in Asia and pad out the rest of the shoe with Phylon.
Originally Posted by theroach27
im surprised that the new running bags degrade so fast...
.
Originally Posted by theroach27
im surprised that the new running bags degrade so fast...
.
Originally Posted by mt3130
^^^thats the reason why they dont call them the air max 360s anymore.
Originally Posted by mt3130
^^^thats the reason why they dont call them the air max 360s anymore.
Originally Posted by swingshot
The Original 360s bags were made in the US, then shipped to Asia.
The shoes those air bags were used in didn't have any Phylon.
The Air Max 2009 however does appear to have some sort of Phylon derivative, people
have spoken about how the cushioning breaks down fairly quickly.
Yet at the same time, Nike are telling us that the Phylon in the Lebron VII is improved somehow.
All i can see is they've stopped the US made 360 bags because it's cheaper to produce smaller bags
in Asia and pad out the rest of the shoe with Phylon.
Originally Posted by swingshot
The Original 360s bags were made in the US, then shipped to Asia.
The shoes those air bags were used in didn't have any Phylon.
The Air Max 2009 however does appear to have some sort of Phylon derivative, people
have spoken about how the cushioning breaks down fairly quickly.
Yet at the same time, Nike are telling us that the Phylon in the Lebron VII is improved somehow.
All i can see is they've stopped the US made 360 bags because it's cheaper to produce smaller bags
in Asia and pad out the rest of the shoe with Phylon.