mplsdunk
Supporter
- May 25, 2004
- 35,996
- 56,195
I mean, there’s probably some truth to that.
Either way it doesn’t change the fact that it’s a blatant war crime to target civilians and/or civilian infrastructure, even if hypothetically there are ‘legitimate targets’ inside.
That school full of kids that the US bombed in Iran was next to an IRGC compound too. Doesn’t change anything about targeting civilians being an explicit war crime. It’s smart to build schools etc right next to military compounds but the likes of Israel just see it as extra motivation if they can slaughter some extra civilians.
Even if, hypothetically, a hospital or similar civilian facility is filled to the brim with military targets, it doesn’t give anyone the right to bomb said facility.
Even that Israeli operation where they set off mini bombs inside those communication devices violates that basic principle. The targets in possession were (supposedly) exclusively military targets but it ended up as a gigantic war crime anyway because they indiscriminately set them off all at once without accounting for civilians who were nearby.
Israel massacring civilians isn’t merely a byproduct, it’s the main goal in the first place.
There’s zero reason to give Israel/America the benefit of the doubt here


