- 6,839
- 21,399
- Joined
- Nov 7, 2019
Must be the rIgHt tO dEfĒnD tH€msElvE$, I guess
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
This game of Liberals and Leftists playing chicken with the prospect of Donald Trump's second term, it has to stop.
We need to defeat Trump and Netanyahu this year.
Leftists need to grow a brain and be willing to vote strategically. Liberals need to get some damn heart and courage and pressure Biden into changing course on Palestine.
We all want a better and a more just world. Our interests are conjoined and doing anything that helps the monsters in Mar-a-Lago or Tel Aviv win, is detrimental to that effect.
I think it should be obvious by now that the Left's inability to win where/when it matters is linked to their rejection of pragmatism. I don't know how you fix it. There are enough disgusted Republicans/independents out there to give Biden a road to victory, but winning with the support of the political center/center-right will not make Democrats move "further left" on foreign policy.
I'm done with leftist online. I'm convinced most of them aren't going to do a thing but make post about guillotines and have a circle jerk over who's read more Marx.
Of course the Dems and liberals are going to go center right to get votes. Those people actually vote.
All those opposed to American Apartheid have, ipso facto, opted into a diverse coalition. Good faith participation thus requires us to, at minimum, 1) fight for one another and 2) tolerate some degree of compromise for the sake of progress rather than pulling apart at the seams, acceding to "divide and conquer" strategies so often stoked by Astroturfed agitprop.
I don't think there's adequate respect for the toll it takes on the most vulnerable members of a coalition to mollify the least vulnerable, to keep them sufficiently motivated.
That the least vulnerable members of a coalition can, at any point, take their ball and go home the instant they don't get their way is, itself, a compound accretion of privilege - an ever-present implicit threat that is perpetually weaponized to center their desires as the linchpin to democracy itself, a la Joe Manchin.
Do you think Presidents should serve more than two terms? I really feel like the two term maximum should be reconsidered.
its propogandaI think the most ironic part of people who choose to abstain from voting is that the current Republican candidate tried to stage a coup and eliminate the power of voting entirely.
Have fun saving your vote for a non-existant 'ideal' candidate against a former president and party that tried to establish permanent authoriarian rule. With a little more nutjobs in Congress and on the Supreme Court, who's to say it couldn't have succeeded? Sure they used violence but they also came up with a legal theory that would have granted them permanent dictatorship if they could get the Supreme Court to sign off on it.
Comments got me crying.
This is also the first time I've heard about the book Black Like Me
What a c**t.
It's been done before. Multiple times.