- 26,661
- 38,215
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2013
So like last time I gave you the accused pedo babysitter hypothetical, you agreed.You’re right.
Alright, then what is the fundamental difference between my babysitter example and someone like Roy Moore?
Like the babysitter example, Moore was not arrested, charged or under criminal investigation at the time the allegations surfaced. In fact Moore has immunity for all his accusations due to Alabama’s statute of limitations laws. He couldn’t be charged for the offenses in the accusations no matter what.
You say I’m right that you would remove a babysitter with multiple pedo allegations against him.Unlike Moore, this babysitter is not immune from criminal investigation and prosecution for his accusations. In this example though, the babysitter hasn’t faced any legal trouble yet.
Roy Moore applied for a job, one where he would represent Alabama in the Senate.
The babysitter already had a job and you agreed you’d remove him over the accusations, for which he can face criminal liability.
In short, in these 2 scenarios why do you only apply your idea of due process to Roy Moore, the one who couldn’t face criminal liability even if he bragged ‘damn right I touched those kids and I regret nothing’ at every rally?
Last edited: