If you heard that about a devout Muslim, it would be wrong, just as it is wrong in this case. Wouldn’t it?
You are a lawyer.
You are fully aware that judges have a duty to apply the law to the facts. Unless you are implying that her personal religious views render her incapable of doing that, then the entire discussion is irrelevant.
A good faith discussion, from you, is acknowledging that there are ethical implications to her signaling how she plans to rule on particular issues. Surely you are familiar with the “Ginsburg Rule.” Especially as it relates to issues that are currently being litigated.
RBG also chose not to comment on such issues at her hearing.
The only reason I responded to the poster the way I did is because he asked would “I” hire someone who did not answer questions. Instead of you addressing him asking me that, you went to my response being in bad faith—yet his question was in the same realm (an average Joe hiring process).