- 14,704
- 35,491
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
They might be right...The gop think this country is a joke.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
They might be right...The gop think this country is a joke.
Probably by 5 different men.Nancy had 5 kids in 6 years.
Goddamn
glad you see it too.they're just very fine people that love their country and he appreciates their support.
Not even AOC would agree with you on this famb.pelosi got some nerve alluding to the diversity of the democratic party when she stays hatin and dismissing AOC
Yeah personal experience under the ACA before/after the transition while unemployed --poor folks didn't pay the tax penalty, also qualified for an extra cash benefit applied to the cost so you could literally have the best available gold plans for around 200 a month, which is more than most people use because the silver ones were ample and only cost me about 100 a month after the benefit and mirrored the previous plan I had with an employer. Both those tiers had a higher level of benefits and service than what would be available normally to the poor. It was solid till it was sabotaged by Trump and the GOP still without a replacement. Soon after he took office the options were way less, and the worst ones with basically no benefit, ones you would get just to avoid the penalty were now in that 600 range.-Go look up other countries that have universal healthcare programs, many have mandates. Most even worse than what the US had, in fact, many economist pointed out the US mandate might be too weak. A healthcare mandate was what the economist who wrote the bill put in because it is good economics. You need to prevent free riding and adverse selection if you are gonna allow pre-existing conditions.
-The tax penalty was income based, so poor people didn't have to pay it. Also the ACA gave poor people free health insurance through the Medicaid expansion. It is was not an anti-poor program, it was the opposite, it was an anti-poverty program.
-When the markets opened, most folks were not getting a quote everywhere close to $500 a month, maybe there were some areas, but the price increases came later. In fact when the markets opened many plans were priced below market value to attract more people. Companies were competing. However Marco Rubio during one of budget discussion demanded the risk corridor be removed from the ACA. The risk corridor meant that the government would pick up insurers extra cost, that way they don't pass it onto consumers with more expensive plans. As soon as that went away, picks started spiking like crazy, insurers pulled out of regions, so it left others with the option to jack up prices further.
If the ACA was passed in its original proposal, with the public option, nationwide marketplaces, 55 Medicare sign up, bigger income assistance, and didn't get weakened by the GOP, it would be a an even bigger success than it is.
Famb the ACA was good policy with good intentions. Obama himself said if he could start from scratch, he would just do single payer, but we were not starting from scratch. ACA has its shortcomings but those were a combination of trying to build a plan a centrist would accept, and Republicans constant attacks.
Like if it was so bad, then why did Bernie vote for it?
Sorry, but you are peddling a convenient sorry about the ACA, that handwaves a ton of ****.
Does the cartoon character villain have a child sex slave from Cuba named Nestor?
Not even AOC would agree with you on this famb.
AOC generally speaks highly of Pelosi. Nancy is great at her job.Facts AOC‘a first day was her leading a protest in Pelosi’s office. Pelosi has handled AOC and the squad with kid gloves and it’s paying off as they become better congresswomen instead of just activist who have been elected.