- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,234
- 202,672
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
the cheek.....the ****ing Cheek
Ahh I see. I read somewhere he pointed the taser at the cop and that’s when they shot him. Maybe misread? Who knows. Still horrible
Someone school me on why media is treating the ATL shooting almost the same as they did with other REAL innocent people dying for wayyy less reason
obviouslY I think there should be 0 deaths at hands of cops but the guy was sleeping at a drive thru, drunk and stole a cops taser and pointed it at the cop. I mean someone cue the Chris rock video about how to act when cops stop you. They aren’t your friends. They stop you, keep it business and for the love of god don’t fight them and steal their tasers
Disclaimer: I’m a long time BLM advocate. In fact I think it’s even silly to stop at “matters” but society ain’t there yet unfortunately. I don’t mean to say cops are right and people should bow down to them but I don’t wanna give fuel to the anti BLM folks by equating this senseless shooting (where the cops won’t get fired since they technically did the right thing according to protocol) to one where cops are blatantly asses (pick any of the many cases where cops kill a guy for doing literally nothing and not even resisting)
2. (1) @MinnesotasChef = @mplsdunk
(2) I understand that, I just don't like it. If I had it my way & I'm positive it will happen sooner than later, I would like for independents to have a say on one side during the primaries. Definitely not two that would cause a whole lot of manipulative activity & people would rig it so Kanye runs against a roach.
3. Man all partisan stuff ain't doing nothing creating daunting bickering that may or may not result in a compromise that barely moves the needle. You & dwalk31 may the best example of this. You go back and forth, but what do either of you really achieve from it? The only conclusion I ever really see is due to one of u getting tired of responding to the other, and thats the compromise. It's congress in a nutshell. A senseless cycle of opposing egos clas resulting in a lackluster compromise if there even is one. Has dwalk been banned? dwalk31 have u convince rusty aren't a bigot or a "pathetic troll"? What is really getting accomplished?
4. In regards to Anarchy. I never said I was for it, that was just me throwing out a thought.
-But the FDA= Big Trash (look at these fatass kids)
-Industrialization=Bigger Trash (s/o to global warming)
-Bridge Maintenance= Somebody will do it.
-If a bird wants to stand or sit there to be run over by a plane then **** that bird.
-Workers can unionize. If they're here illegally then that's a deeper conversations.
-Consumer protection is up to them. People are paying a $1500 plus for those ugly ***, cheap *** Chunky Dunky's that would be around $160 at most on the secondary market 2yrs ago. If there's one thing being into sneakers has taught is that buyer's run the sneaker resale market, and resellers are asking for what they think the buyers will pay. Consumers are in charge of themselves
Now for communism. Communism is just as contradictory as capitalism, the contradictions are why they're both **** system's. Communism preaches equality, yet you have ppl in charge enforcing said "equality." Capitalism produces & promotes crippling debt that only the people up top w/ a false sense of security benefits from and the people under are nothing more than indentured servants. The common occurrence w/ both is that some are benefitting while many aren't. Black & White.
5. Doesn't work:
I think someone stealing your taser and pointing it at you is within a 'reasonable' margin to use deadly force. He could taser you and steal your gun.
If he was running away then my argument goes out the window.We can agree to disagree on this.
I would venture to say it is probably uniformly against police policy to respond that way. But, of course, policy isn't the law.
Many police get shot with tasers during training (as an option in the academy).
They train for that.
But this is discussion is a bit beyond the fact pattern we have in this case--he was running away when he was shot.
They shot him as he was running away with his back towards them.displayed the capability, opportunity and intent to cause serious bodily injuries to both officers.
They shot him as he was running away with his back towards them.
They shot him as he was running away with his back towards them.
"Leniency" implies a punishment in court, whereas the question here is the use of deadly force in an arrest. Two separate issues.Are you implying that people who commit serious crimes and even violent crimes should be granted leniency because they run away?
Well if he's running away there's no longer an imminent threat.Are you implying that people who commit serious crimes and even violent crimes should be granted leniency because they run away?