elpablo21
Supporter
- Feb 11, 2008
- 106,458
- 195,941
I thought his response to defunding the police would have been more aggressive
Last edited:
***Official Political Discussion Thread***
- Thread in 'General' Thread starter Started by rico x hood,
- Start date
I thought his response to defunding the police would have been more aggressive
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,191
I realize something
Delk doesn't know that Georgia's primary is for both parties. Not just Democrats
And Delk doesn't know that the DNC doesn't run state primaries
Dude is a troll, but on this subject he is a ignorant troll. So let us not entertain his buffoonery on this subject
Delk doesn't know that Georgia's primary is for both parties. Not just Democrats
And Delk doesn't know that the DNC doesn't run state primaries
Dude is a troll, but on this subject he is a ignorant troll. So let us not entertain his buffoonery on this subject
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,191
What about all the House Seats that have primaries?
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,011
- 3,294
I realize something
Delk doesn't know that Georgia's primary is for both parties. Not just Democrats
And Delk doesn't know that the DNC doesn't run state primaries
Dude is a troll, but on this subject he is a ignorant troll. So let us not entertain his buffoonery on this subject
I do realize that the Georgia primary is for both parties.
I am from GA. And have actually voted in a GA primary plenty of times.
What you don't seem to realize (or at least you act like you don't realize) is that this is a primary election.
The implication that the GOP is suppressing the vote makes zero sense. What would the goal be?
To prevent Democratic voters from choosing who they want to run against the GOP candidate?
On this subject, unless you are joking, you have no idea what a primary election is.
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,011
- 3,294
What about all the House Seats that have primaries?
Even still, what would the goal of the GOP suppressing the vote be?
To prevent a bunch of people from voting for the GOP candidates for the House seats?
To what end?
The logic doesn't make sense.
Again, unless you are joking you do not understand the purpose of a primary election.
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,191
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,011
- 3,294
Looking at Delk trying to throw some struggle jabs
He feisty today
Yea.. go try to salvage the nonsense argument of voter suppression for a primary.
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,191
Because besides trying to rig elections, the GOP is also cruel.
So making Democratic voters stand in line and risk Covid infections is something on par with what the GOP does.
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,191
Quote where I said this act was about voter suppression.Yea.. go try to salvage the nonsense argument of voter suppression for a primary.
Your head is so far up you own *** that you confused my comment with someone else.
You're just a buffoon think he is doing it right now
Last edited:
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,011
- 3,294
Props for finding some way to make it make sense.
Now it is just Democratic voters standing in line (when you JUST thought you explained to me it was for both parties
)And your theory is the GOP is trying to get voters to stand in line...waits for it...to risk COVID (in a primary where both parties vote).
I've heard it all.
- Oct 8, 2003
- 17,333
- 9,059
Sea lion struggling in shallow waters
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,191
So you gonna ignore the fact you strawmaned my argumentProps for finding some way to make it make sense.
Now it is just Democratic voters standing in line (when you JUST thought you explained to me it was for both parties
And your theory is the GOP is trying to get voters to stand in line...waits for it...to risk COVID (in a primary where both parties vote).
I've heard it all.
Ok Delk, stay pathetic
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,011
- 3,294
You reposted two tweets that hinted at voter suppression. And said this is the type of treachery the GOP does.
I then asked about voter suppression and you responded.
And another person straight up mentioned voter suppression and I quoted both of you.
I guess you see claiming voter suppression is ridiculous so you want to do the walk back.
Cool
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,011
- 3,294
It's not a strawman.
Perhaps you'll be all caught up when you look at the message you liked that was posted by
plansb
In your own way, I appreciate you acknowledging the ridiculousness of the initial implication.
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,191
I want everyone to make note of this
"Mr. I Didn't Literally Say That", is now claiming that he deduced my argument from by some vague actions, not my actual words.
Pathetic Troll
Last edited:
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,191
so now liking a post makes it my argumentIt's not a strawman.
Perhaps you'll be all caught up when you look at the message you liked that was posted by
In your own way, I appreciate you acknowledging the ridiculousness of the initial implication.
Man please shut the up.
Last edited:
- Apr 30, 2010
- 69,690
- 106,351
This is sick, they would have to purposely ween out the races they don't want to get this ratio.
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,011
- 3,294
- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,191
I guess Delk is cool with me calling him a racist, and a hater of white supremacy, because I made an inference based on his behavior and posts.
- Dec 30, 2006
- 12,011
- 3,294
Man please shut the **** up.
The struggle is real
- Sep 15, 2014
- 1,149
- 4,471
I miss him.
- Oct 7, 2007
- 7,589
- 7,468
Dwalk is Kyrie Irving without the basketball talent.
- Mar 30, 2007
- 151,241
- 202,676
- Jun 28, 2004
- 6,980
- 17,059
I don’t know the details of every State’s primaries or caucuses but it seems like most primaries run through the same electoral machinery as general elections.
In Georgia, it’s not much of a stretch to assume that the Secretary of State is doing a dry run for suppressing the votes of black peoples and young adults in the general election.
In Georgia, it’s not much of a stretch to assume that the Secretary of State is doing a dry run for suppressing the votes of black peoples and young adults in the general election.
Similar threads
