- 150,426
- 201,081
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2007
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Da free market bThe 737 + small airline makes me think the same thing.
The many human errors that brought down the Boeing 737 Max
A damning investigation revealing the many small failures that led to 346 lives being lost.www.theverge.com
The second AoA sensor (that ensured redundancy) was sold as an option, and only the larger, wealthier airline companies could afford it. It was never caught because Boeing basically inspected their own systems (arrangement with the FAA).
Don't you just love unregulated capitalism?
http://maristpoll.marist.edu/wp-con...Poll_USA-NOS-and-Tables_1912131159.pdf#page=3
Because he polls around the same or lower with groups as he did in 2016. Rex wanted to point to poll numbers to argue a point about Sanders non-white support, I am pointing out that polls also so him not improved his standing on aggregate.
I am sure he was won over some new non-white voters. But that is not the point I am pushing back against.
Edit: Sorry but the poll you cite is not a good comparison to the one I provided. The are different because I cited a the general poll they put out now, seems the one you cited was to investigate the feelings of Latino voters. It doesn't even have a head-to-head with Sanders and Clinton (unless I am missing it).Good looks, RustyShackleford .
It took me some time to find a comparable poll in the lead up to the last Democratic primaries, but I found this Marist poll from September 2015 (less than a year before Clinton locked* up the nomination):
On page 30 you can see the surprisingly low percentage of Latinos and African Americans who did not recognize Sanders (50% and 44%, respectively).
That is quite a contrast to the poll you shared. Not only did the December 2019 Marist poll not even bother to ask the question of whether Sanders (or any other candidate) was recognizable. But, more to the point, 29% of non-white “undecided yet leaning toward a candidate” folks polled signaled Sanders was their man (page 14). That’s a higher percentage in support of Sanders than the other candidates. Non-white folks polled were also leaning more toward Sanders than white undecided Democratic voters (14).
In light of the poll you shared, and when compared to a similar and credible poll from 2015, I find it hard to see how Sanders “polls the same or lower” among non-whites.
Honestly speaking, that's terrorists actions. Spreading fear for political gains. They don't want to look weak but they also want to pressure the UAE to talk to the US to avoid further problems.
If they really wanted all the problems they would just say ... this is between us and them, dont help or then you're against us. The proceeded to **** on everything US.