***Official Political Discussion Thread***

I said the only real solution is "changing hearts and minds." Not sure how you can regulate away people wanting to murder other people. Murder, itself, is against the law after all.

The goal isn’t as broad as “regulating” people wanting to murder. The goal is addressing a very specific problem Americans seem to have with gun violence. Can you imagine if Jonas Salk and Albert Sabin decided to not make the polio vaccine because people could still get sick from other diseases? Are vaccines pointless because they don’t cure all disease?


But as much as id like to back and forth while you lawyer up responses, I’m gonna tap out from this thread for awhile. This country is steeped in toxic politics and I need to unplug.
 
Last edited:
But not to purchase, which is what I said...

And the penalties for not having a license, plates, and insurance are small civil fines.

You only need cash to buy a gun too tbh

The entire point is the ease you can buy a gun though. You can buy a gun as easily as you can buy a car, but one you need specific things to legally operate and one you can just buy a hide in your waistband.

Hell I could go buy a few right now but I bet if I tried to buy more than 3 boxes of Sudafed at once I'd have a problem :lol:
 
Trump Supporter:
I have two ways to answer this question:

  1. No, there is no rigging of Google intentionally. This is stupid and conspiratorial and is extremely dangerous. This fuels animosity where there doesn't need to be any.

  2. Obviously there is consensus-building within the Google algorithms, that is how it works. Trump is right: there are some correct things Trump has done that other people have not had the balls to do, these things have helped the country largely, helped investments, and have created jobs.

Non-Supporter:
Are you also saying that Trump himself is stupid, conspiratorial, and extremely dangerous? Are you saying that he us fueling animosity where there doesn't need to be any?

Trump Supporter:
People can say stupid or conspiratorial things without themselves being stupid or conspiratorial, but in general yes: I believe Trump is dangerous. That doesn't mean he's causing harm, just that he's more likely to than another candidate who could have been president.

stare.gif
 
Trump’s Promises to ‘Forgotten Man’ Undercut by Wage Stagnation

President Donald Trump heads into a midterm referendum on his presidency showing no real progress on a core promise: to raise the wages of America’s “forgotten man and woman.”

Once the impact of inflation is included, ordinary Americans’ hourly earnings are lower than they were a year ago.

Real wages have remained mostly stagnant despite an expanding economy, record stock prices, soaring corporate profits and a giant deficit-fueled stimulus from Trump’s tax cuts that took effect Jan. 1. The Trump administration claimed its policies would immediately boost wages, with its tax overhaul ultimately increasing average pay by $4,000 to $9,000.

That hasn’t happened. And though Trump regularly boasts of the economy’s performance, many Americans don’t feel they’re sharing in the gains -- a risk for Republicans as they seek to defend their House and Senate majorities in November elections.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/mar...by-wage-stagnation/ar-BBMxEAd?ocid=spartandhp
 


https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...illegal/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.a2613ff8a84a
Trump’s economic adviser: ‘We’re taking a look’ at whether Google searches should be regulated
The Trump administration is “taking a look” at whether Google and its search engine should be regulated by the government, Larry Kudlow, President Trump’s economic adviser, said Tuesday outside the White House.

“We’ll let you know,” Kudlow said. “We’re taking a look at it.”

The announcement puts the search giant squarely in the White House’s crosshairs amid wider allegations against the tech industry that it systematically discriminates against conservatives on social media and other platforms.

Kudlow’s remark to reporters came hours after Trump fired off a series of predawn tweets complaining about Google search results for “Trump News.”

In a pair of tweets posted before 6 a.m., the president said the results included only “the viewing/reporting of Fake New Media.”

Google, in a statement, said its searches aren’t politically biased: “When users type queries into the Google Search bar, our goal is to make sure they receive the most relevant answers in a matter of seconds. Search is not used to set a political agenda and we don’t bias our results toward any political ideology.
“Every year, we issue hundreds of improvements to our algorithms to ensure they surface high-quality content in response to users’ queries,” Google said. “We continually work to improve Google Search and we never rank search results to manipulate political sentiment.”

The White House has not responded to requests for further comment.

Trump’s tweets came the morning after Fox Business host Lou Dobbs aired an interview Monday night with the pro-Trump commentators Lynnette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson, popularly known as Diamond and Silk, who have long claimed that their online videos are being suppressed by tech companies.

“I am not for big government, but I really do believe that the government should step in and really check this out,” Hardaway told Dobbs in the interview.

Google search results are affected not only by region but also by personal search history. It was unclear whether the president had Googled himself, or whether he was referring to a recent piece in PJ Media, a conservative blog, alleging that 96 percent of Google search results for news about Trump were from “left-leaning news outlets.” His accusations appeared to mirror those in the Aug. 25 piece.

“Is Google manipulating its algorithm to prioritize left-leaning news outlets in their coverage of President Trump?” asked Paula Bolyard, the “supervising editor” of the site, who describes herself on Twitter as a Christian, a constitutional conservative and a “Cultural nonconformist.”

She said she searched “Trump” on Google News and weighed the results using a media bias chartdeveloped by Sharyl Attkisson, a former CBS News correspondent. Bolyard said left-leaning outlets accounted for 96 percent of the results, with CNN stories making up “nearly 29 percent of the total.” She said she performed the search several times using different computers, and the results did not differ considerably.

But nowhere did the editor and blogger reckon with the fact that the sheer volume of content produced by different outlets plays a major role in determining the share of results they claim. She did, however, acknowledge that her methods are “not scientific.”

Trump, for his part, gave only one specific example, saying “Fake CNN is prominent.” But he concluded, “they have it RIGGED, for me & others, so that almost all stories & news is BAD.” Conservative media, he claimed, is “shut out.”

“Illegal?” he speculated, going on to accuse Google of “controlling what we can & cannot see.” He promised the “very serious situation” would be “addressed,” but didn’t give specifics.

A search for “Trump News” shortly after the president’s posts returned three top stories. There was a Fox News report about Lanny Davis, an attorney and spokesman for Trump’s former lawyer Michael Cohen, admitting he was an anonymous source for CNN’s report about Trump’s possible prior knowledge of the summer 2016 meeting at Trump Tower attended by a Russian lawyer. There was also a CNN account of Trump’s decision to issue, several days late, a statement praising the late senator John McCain (R-Ariz.). And there was an NBC story about the surge of Muslim candidates inspired to run for office across the country by Trump’s election.

Trump has raised alarm about what he describes as political bias pervading technology and social media companies. In July, he accused Twitter of using a “discriminatory and illegal practice” to silence conservative voices. Jack Dorsey, the chief executive of the social media giant, said the company’s employees are “more left-leaning” but maintained that political ideology doesn’t affect what appears on Twitter.

Representatives of major technology companies appeared before Congress in July to answer allegations of censorship. Facebook, Google and Twitter also plan to send top executives to Capitol Hill next week for hearings that could result in even further scrutiny of the way they handle political content on their platforms.

“We have a natural and long-term incentive to make sure our products work for users of all viewpoints,” said Juniper Downs, who works on policy for Google-owned YouTube.
 
If you vote for me in The niketalk politcal thread midterms
The only regulating i will do would take place on a clear black night with a clear white moon. I will be accompanied by my friend Warren
 
Last edited:
The goal isn’t as broad as “regulating” people wanting to murder. The goal is addressing a very specific problem Americans seem to have with gun violence. Can you imagine if Jonas Salk and Albert Sabin decided to not make the polio vaccine because people could still get sick from other diseases? Are vaccines pointless because they don’t cure all disease?


But as much as id like to back and forth while you lawyer up responses, I’m gonna tap out from this thread for awhile. This country is steeped in toxic politics and I need to unplug.

Yea man most definitely take a break. There is simply no sense in getting overwhelmed by the current political climate. A lot of my friends have had to "cut the cord." Gotta do what's best for you.

I don't think it is either a solution for everything, or a solution for nothing. I was saying that I wish that we could cure all of it. But, I am certainly down for trying CDC studies and additional regulations. Personally, I am not optimistic about those things having any real change, but worth a shot.
 
How dumb can this dude be? Google search uses an algorithm numbers don’t lie. The stupidity/lies are more insulting every day
 
Actually this is what I said:
Jesus Christ. *****s are either straight out liars or seriously lack reading comprehension skills.:lol::smh:

It is called paraphrasing....

I didn't bring up cars... itsaboutthattime did. And he also brought up vehicles being another "potentially dangerous thing." If you think that my paraphrase was an unfair characterization then I question your comprehension skills.

But, in the echo chamber, it doesn't really matter.
 
He's not dumb (I take that back, hes a full blown idiot, but not for this), he just wants to do more controlling of the narrative, and fooling idiots who don't take the time to think about how Google's algorithms work.

That's funny is while it's all happening plainly before our eyes, i.e. villainizing the media. It's directly out of Putin's playbook, and we all just sit around and watch it happen.

This country is trash.
 
It is called paraphrasing....

I didn't bring up cars... itsaboutthattime did. And he also brought up vehicles being another "potentially dangerous thing." If you think that my paraphrase was an unfair characterization then I question your comprehension skills.

But, in the echo chamber, it doesn't really matter.
YIKES!!!

You're better than this
 
Back
Top Bottom