- Apr 30, 2010
- 69,686
- 106,337
Both parties are the same.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Both parties are the same.
**** like this is just as annoying and nonsensical as the "both sides" hot takes.Not true, Democrats would make sure that all poor folk pay equally usurious rates on cars that they drive to and from their non benefits, low paid temp jobs. We need equality, all poor people must be guaranteed a reasonable interest rate in order to get their "side hustle on" and earn their net three bucks an hour driving for uber.
**** like this is just as annoying and nonsensical as the "both sides" hot takes.
The Democratic Party is not a leftist party so it doesn't really care about poor people. Yeah, ok, sure.
**** like this is just as annoying and nonsensical as the "both sides" hot takes.
The Democratic Party is not a leftist party so it doesn't really care about poor people. Yeah, ok, sure.
Sorry famb.Y this showing you quoted me?
Da irony of Ninja voting for this nonsense.Party of Lincoln (Navigator)
Republicans Just Made It Easier For Auto Companies to Rob Black Consumers; Call Evidence of Discrimination ‘Junk Science’
The Republican Party policies of financial deregulation and rollback of civil rights enforcement have come together, as the U.S. Senate gives the green light for auto lenders to racially discriminate against Black and Latino consumers with more expensive loans.
In a vote on party lines, Republicans led by Sen. Pat Toomey of Pennsylvania, with the aid of one Democrat — Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia — made use of the Congressional Review Act to overturn an Obama-era rule issued by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB). Issued in 2013, the guidance from the Obama administration explained that some car lenders that offer financing through dealerships engage in illegal and discriminatory markups that harm consumers and cost them tens of millions of dollars each year.
Shouldn’t that be illegal? He’s medaling first hand with the media
I mean I’m assuming he isn’t calling to say goodnight. He’s swaying the media to say or leave out certain things. Surely something along those lines are illegalNot so much that, but you have to wonder if he's sharing classified information with that particular media member.