***Official Political Discussion Thread***

There no logic in banning AR 15s while still keeping handguns legal even if restricted if your goal is preventing death from a person killing multiple people with firearms.
 
Last edited:
There no logic in banning AR 15s while still keeping handguns legal even if restricted if your goal is preventing death from a person from killing multiple people from firearms.
Do you even realize that your are making an argument for banning both, not for keeping regulation on the AR-15 the way it is.

People that want gun regulation are not gonna not gonna drop the AR-15 stuff because of a handgun would be a better weapon of death in certain mass shootings.

And I must point out, using body count as a strict measure of efficiency will always bias the analysis because not every mass shooting is not the same.
 
Last edited:
Do you even realize that your are making an argument for banning both, not for keeping regulation on the AR-15 the way it is.

People that want gun regulation are bot gonna not gonna drop the AR-15 stuff because of a handgun would be a better weapon of death in certain mass shootings.


Oh I know that’s why I brought it up.

So unless you plan on banning all semi automatic guns and pump actions there really isn’t a point in banning AR-15s.

The reason knowledgeable gun people always jump to banning all guns in response to calls for banning AR 15s due to mass shootings is because there is only one place that line of thinking is going to end up.

If someone says we need to ban all semi automatic guns in America, I wouldn’t agree with allowing it to happen but I could at least see the logic in it.

If you remove suicides AR 15s kill maybe 300 people a year.

You are literally more likely to be struck by lightening than to be killed by a AR 15.

So let’s just cut to the chase and say we need to ban 90% of guns in the country and let’s have that discussion.
 
Oh I know that’s why I brought it up.

So unless you plan on banning all semi automatic guns and pump actions there really isn’t a point in banning AR-15s.

The reason knowledgeable gun people always jump to banning all guns in response to calls for banning AR 15s due to mass shootings is because there is only one place that line of thinking is going to end up.

If someone says we need to ban all semi automatic guns in America, I wouldn’t agree with allowing it to happen but I could at least see the logic in it.

If you remove suicides AR 15s kill maybe 300 people a year.

You are literally more likely to be struck by lightening than to be killed by a AR 15.

So let’s just cut to the chase and say we need to ban 90% of guns in the country and let’s have that discussion.
Fair enough
 
That’s the way I’ve always approached it. Either ban them all or ban all semi automatics so I definitely agree on that front.

This is very dicey I agree with you on that.
 
Bruh.....this ***** STAY getting curved :rollin.

How repulsive do you have to be that as a billionaire, most powerful man in the free world, and over 40 years as a celebrity.....that you can’t get your Eastern European mail order bride to show you ANY public affection :lol



One of the other things that always struck me about the access Hollywood tape was how trump tricked off money on that married woman, took her shopping, “moved on her like a bish”.....and still got rejected :lol.
 
with that cheeto putty face son has I know he defo not duffin cheeks off the swagger. Son smells like big money and low self esteem
 
Assault rifles is just another symptom of the disease, which is the mass proliferation of firearms. The opioid crisis is an easy comparison, where small communities are flooded with lab grade anesthetics and to everyone's surprise suddenly streets are overflowing with lethal drugs ready to be abused. I'm just going to make an outrageous claim and say, I bet there's a good few mom and pop gunshops located near state lines, who sell an obscene amount of firearms to college kid repeat customers, making a healthy living of straw purchases.

With today's lockdown procedures, no surprise the AR platform has become popular among spree shooters, if you want to penetrate crowds or classroom doors, your best bet is a supersonic round served in a high capacity repeating rifle. As for Aurora, I think common consensus is, that he would have killed a whole lot more people, if he hadn't malfunctioned his assault rifle with a C mag.

I just want to remind, that every weapon used in a crime was legally produced by a company and legally sold. Among all these responsible companies, stores and owners, there seems to be a leak somewhere, if not an outright spill.
 
I wonder what it's like to be a smug **** that's just contrarian for the sake of being contrarian. Can someone be happy with themselves like that? sidetracking with essentially irrelevant convo.
 
I have no sympathy for Melania. She did exactly what his voters did x100. But that was funny af tho :lol:

See at least a dozen tweets a week from some liberal females feeling sorry for Melania, "get out Melania", "divorce him Melania", "she looks so miserable". Melania was the sidechick turned trophy wife. She knew Drumpf was a dooooosssh so Melania can kick rocks.
 
That’s the way I’ve always approached it. Either ban them all or ban all semi automatics so I definitely agree on that front.

This is very dicey I agree with you on that.
Here we don't have blanket bans on gun types besides fully automatic and military grade weaponry but we have laws banning specific gun parts or characteristics.
Weapons that can fold in half above a certain caliber and barrel diameter (.20 caliber) are banned for example, which bans some folding shotguns like the one I used to have.
There's also a ban on firearms in which the barrel or/and gunstock itself can be deconstructed in different parts, guns that have been altered for concealment and guns that have been altered to the point of no longer matching their permit description (sawed-off shotgun for example). I used literal translations of the law if it reads a bit vague. There's also ammo capacity restrictions per gun class. A legal handgun may only have a capacity of 5 shots for example. The above laws don't ban semi-auto rifles as a whole but something like an AR-15 or similarly highly customizable guns are banned by default.
There are other similar laws against specific gun parts such as a ban on beam-projecting gunsights and silencers.

I think that's more efficient than banning a whole class of firearms. Under the above laws there's still plenty of rifle and carbine options available. They just don't allow much in terms of customization and ammo capacity. If you want a legal handgun you can go get one but it's only gonna have a maximum ammo capacity of 5 shots. If you want the full handgun experience you can always go to a shooting club and fire all kinds of guns you're not allowed to personally own.
 
Donny wanted some hand holding loving since Melania swerved his *** earlier....



Bruh.....this ***** STAY getting curved :rofl:.

How repulsive do you have to be that as a billionaire, most powerful man in the free world, and over 40 years as a celebrity.....that you can’t get your Eastern European mail order bride to show you ANY public affection :lol:



One of the other things that always struck me about the access Hollywood tape was how trump tricked off money on that married woman, took her shopping, “moved on her like a bish”.....and still got rejected :lol:.


Haven't seen a curve this vicious since Handsome B Wonderful on NEXT
sabu.png
 
Back
Top Bottom