- Jul 20, 2009
- 64,967
- 196,190
I would be inclined to agree with Comey's notion that what she said and did was concerning. She tried to influence the FBI's narrative on the email investigation to be more in line with the campaign's narrative and then there's also the meeting with Bill on the tarmac. Personally I would say that warrants at least some degree of scrutiny. The problem is that there will be zero consistency on the GOP's part to put Sessions and Trump under intense scrutiny.Nothing, she is out of government and she didn't try to obstruct. She should be looked at as kinda an idiot.
What did she do really? Obama had already set the rules, if Comey recommended charges, charges would be filed.
She did something stupid. But at the same time, Comey might be covering his ***. This "I was compelled to go public is like it's 4tb or 5th reason" . Like child please Comey.
How many things 'troubled" Comey so much that he felt compelled to act unilaterally. Against the advice of the DOJ and White House, during the final year of Obama's term. This was a running theme with dude. And those comments where to refute the NYT times article that said he was motivated by the Russian intelligence he knew was false. Which makes him look incompetent
But Trump tries to obstruct Justice and he just kept memos and shut his mouth.
The GOP could get a win if Lynch claps back and says he is just tryna cover his ***.
Whether it be Clinton or Trump, James Comey needs the world to see him as some dude just above it all.
He is a self righteous dude that is bad under pressure.
I'm not inclined to believe a dude's interpretation of the event if he still can't come to terms with the fact he had a huge hand in creating this mess.
Last edited: