***Official Political Discussion Thread***

[Public Enemy]

https://thehill.com/homenews/media/5011878-donald-trump-donald-trump-jr-mainstream-media-white-house-briefing-room/

"Donald Trump Jr., President-elect Trump’s eldest son, says his dad has discussed keeping some mainstream media outlets from the White House press briefing room.

Trump Jr., speaking on his podcast this week, said they discussed opening the briefing room to more independent journalists and social media influencers.

“We had the conversation about opening up the press room to a lot of these independent journalists,” he said.

“If The New York Times has lied, they’ve been averse to everything, they’re functioning as the marketing arm to the Democrat party,” Trump Jr. continued, asking, “Why not open it up to people who have larger viewerships, stronger followings?”

Trump has consistently ridiculed mainstream media outlets and broadcast networks over coverage that is critical of him.

On Tuesday, he railed against The New York Times over a story focusing on top aide Boris Epshteyn. An internal review conducted by the Trump transition team found that he solicited payments from candidates for top Cabinet positions.

Trump also recently sued CBS News over a “60 Minutes” interview with Vice President Harris and regularly mocks CNN calling it and others “fake news.”

 

[Public Enemy]

We're going to turn into a ****show by this time next year. Norms going out the window. Lies will stream forth from the white house and you'll have a random podcaster more interested in whatever they feel like talking about, than having knowledge of the history of the country and its policies and asking a relevant question.

Just because some outlets like the NYT or Fox News do a **** job at journalism half the time doesn't mean journalism isnt an actual thing with good publications. News Media holding people to account has been responsible for so many huge events it's not even worth going over it all because it should be self-evident.

If this idiot really goes through with this it's going to be a damn mess. For a whole host of reasons but a few are really a problem. Obviously because you'll have nonsense questions and nonsense answers and no real challenging (there will be ceremonial challenging) of what Trump is saying because they will know any real challenge and that's not just the end of your access, he'll get the trump mob to 'cancel' you. Like before, even if the President or administration didn't like you, it didn't mean you were out of a job. But these people will just suck up because they aren't going to want to lose their following overnight.

And if that does indeed happen that regular media isn't allowed to cover this administration, it'll be one or two devastating things in 2028, assuming we have elections. Either Vance will win and continue this nonsense and further distance us from normalcy and legitimacy, or a Democrat will win and all of a sudden all the norms will return and they will seem terrible by comparison because of the intense scrutiny that comes with ACTUAL media.

Feels like we've let a bunch of 8 year olds take over driving a car.

 

[aepps20]

Happy Thanksgiving to everyone in here. I hope those in the states that celebrate the holiday have a good time with their loved ones and friends. Please hug your loved ones and make sure that you eat plenty of and drink lots of today. If you don’t, you might have to unload a check left hook on a loved one because the prices of da eggs and da used to make da sweet potato and pumpkin pies left you NO CHOICE

 

[gry60]

Feels like we've let a bunch of 8 year olds take over driving a car.

That's how the public has always treated republicans: like children that don't know what they're doing.

Obviously because you'll have nonsense questions and nonsense answers and no real challenging (there will be ceremonial challenging) of what Trump is saying because they will know any real challenge and that's not just the end of your access,

To be fair (and blunt), what you're describing predates Trump.

I grew up with CNN International, and they did not shy away from asking hard questions when they interviewed troublesome, non-American political figures. It was a culture shock to discover that American journalists really do pull their punches when it comes to addressing American politicians' improprieties. For decades, CNN International and other American media outlets broadcasting for an international audience painted an image of the country that is line with how media in other democracies work, but once you're here, you realize that the US media generally goes along with whatever politicians say and uses spin to circumvent the duty to perform real-time fact-checking of the politicians they interview.

Spin and the fear of losing access undermined the legitimacy of the US media a long time ago. Trump and the GOP have simply stopped using legacy media as their communication vessel because they have developed another media ecosystem that they control better.

 

[Dark Brandon]

We're going to turn into a ****show by this time next year. Norms going out the window. Lies will stream forth from the white house and you'll have a random podcaster more interested in whatever they feel like talking about, than having knowledge of the history of the country and its policies and asking a relevant question.

Just because some outlets like the NYT or Fox News do a **** job at journalism half the time doesn't mean journalism isnt an actual thing with good publications. News Media holding people to account has been responsible for so many huge events it's not even worth going over it all because it should be self-evident.

If this idiot really goes through with this it's going to be a damn mess. For a whole host of reasons but a few are really a problem. Obviously because you'll have nonsense questions and nonsense answers and no real challenging (there will be ceremonial challenging) of what Trump is saying because they will know any real challenge and that's not just the end of your access, he'll get the trump mob to 'cancel' you. Like before, even if the President or administration didn't like you, it didn't mean you were out of a job. But these people will just suck up because they aren't going to want to lose their following overnight.

And if that does indeed happen that regular media isn't allowed to cover this administration, it'll be one or two devastating things in 2028, assuming we have elections. Either Vance will win and continue this nonsense and further distance us from normalcy and legitimacy, or a Democrat will win and all of a sudden all the norms will return and they will seem terrible by comparison because of the intense scrutiny that comes with ACTUAL media.

Feels like we've let a bunch of 8 year olds take over driving a car.

That's how the public has always treated republicans: like children that don't know what they're doing.

To be fair (and blunt), what you're describing predates Trump.

I grew up with CNN International, and they did not shy away from asking hard questions when they interviewed troublesome, non-American political figures. It was a culture shock to discover that American journalists really do pull their punches when it comes to addressing American politicians' improprieties. For decades, CNN International and other American media outlets broadcasting for an international audience painted an image of the country that is line with how media in other democracies work, but once you're here, you realize that the US media generally goes along with whatever politicians say and uses spin to circumvent the duty to perform real-time fact-checking of the politicians they interview.

Spin and the fear of losing access undermined the legitimacy of the US media a long time ago. Trump and the GOP have simply stopped using legacy media as their communication vessel because they have developed another media ecosystem that they control better.

Dems need to win back all 3 branches and codify the Fairness Doctrine.

 

[SlatanicPanic]

 

[IATT]

 

[wavycrocket]

Who wants to create a grifter/troll podcast

let’s run it up, then flip it on em

Tbh I kinda wanna see how much a right wing grifter would pay for it.
Twitch is abysmal for gaining engagement as a brand new streamer. With an "OG username" though, you can attract followers much more easily.
My personal Twitch account, which I don't name, has roughly 7k followers on Twitch simply from people checking out my profile due to the username, despite the fact I will never stream.

In the "OG marketplace", we refer to these kind of usernames as "Niche OGs", meaning they can fill a niche and attract people, followers, ... more easily simply off of the name. This can then eventually lead to monetizing it, if the account is run properly.

Because of the name "Conservative" and the right skillset, they could in theory become the de facto face of conservatism on Twitch. Literally.

I know I'm going off-topic again but just a reminder of how the "OG username" business works, since it is increasingly more tied to monetization and politics.
My IG @MarkRubio for example used to mock him for being Trump's lapdog but the Senator actually went to IG and got them to take my username away and give it to Rubio at some point.

Rule 1:
Every username of value on any given valuable platform is taken. Only exceptions are brand new things, like a fresh new brand or sports player no one could have accounted for

Rule 2:
OGs are valued in 2 different categories. The first is just to boast, look cool, or show it off as a valuable status symbol. The other kind are "Niche OGs", which can fullfil both roles but is generally meant for improving social media growth and eventual monetization.

Rule 3:
The overwhelming majority of buyers fall in the first category, they just want a cool unique name, maybe show off, ...
Only a relatively small minority buys the "Niche OGs", and these tend to be big spenders. Often involved in running one or more lucrative social media pages.


I once talked to a very wealthy Saudi Arabian buyer who expressed that he bought the instagram "G" and some other 1 character IG username for him and his brother (the IGs later got stolen via SIM-swap) because in his view, everyone around him in Dubai was already filthy rich. Everyone had or can buy the same cars, the mansions, the tigers, ... but only 1 man can have a specific 1 username. And of course, 1 character usernames are the epitome of rarity, as there can only be 26 + 9 at most if you exclude inactive or banned ones.
This was a very valuable conversation I'll probably never forget. Indeed, the shorter the usernames, the more likely you're gonna get interest from wealthy Arab buyers.
For this Saudi person it was his only way of flexing in a way that no one around him could match, despite all having insane wealth.

To bring us back to politics, remember Milo Yiannopolous? He is most definitely not the original owner of the twitter username Nero

DM me

 

[gry60]

You don't impose tariffs on imports that your country doesn't produce.

 

[whoisthisguy]

You don't impose tariffs on imports that your country doesn't produce.

Welp…FAFO in full effect!