- 14,697
- 35,488
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2011
Woody Allen right now:People have known about this relationship for many years, they're just now acting like it's a big deal because he went against their cause (he's pro israel)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Woody Allen right now:People have known about this relationship for many years, they're just now acting like it's a big deal because he went against their cause (he's pro israel)
People have known about this relationship for many years, they're just now acting like it's a big deal because he went against their cause (he's pro israel)
No reason to go to McDonalds anymore.
McDonalds was great when you can get a mchicken, hamburger, small fries, small coke for $4.50
Now its $20 for a basic meal. Rather eat healthier if I'm spending that
McDonalds charging sit down restaurant prices but RustyShackleford going to say inflation isn't sticky.
When his apples start getting hit then he will care, all fun and games when it's just my mimosas suffering
I saw a few biscuit crumbs on his jacket
McDonalds charging sit down restaurant prices but RustyShackleford going to say inflation isn't sticky.
When his apples start getting hit then he will care, all fun and games when it's just my mimosas suffering
Me reading this whining....
Step ya money up playa. Or else this gonna be the summer brunch anthem.....
The most rightwing appeals court in the country has heard a case over discriminatory electoral maps in Galveston, Texas, which threatens to puncture a fresh hole in the already battered 1965 Voting Rights Act.
The US court of appeals for the fifth circuit, which has six of 17 active judges appointed by Donald Trump, heard a clash of views over whether Black and Latino minority voters could have their combined electoral voice protected.
The case, Petteway v Galveston County, risks removing the right of minority groups to join forces in so-called “coalition districts” to elect representatives of their choice.
In October, a federal district judge threw out new electoral maps drawn up by the Republican-controlled county, which eviscerated the only district out of four in which African American and Latino voters collectively were in the majority.
Judge Jeffrey Brown ruled that the eradication of the majority-minority district was a “stark and jarring” violation of the Voting Rights Act, describing the revised maps as “mean-spirited” and “egregious”.
Addressing the full bench of the fifth circuit, Chad Dunn, the lawyer representing the Black and Latino voters who would in effect be disenfranchised by the new maps, gave an impassioned plea for their right to be heard. “Is it too much to ask for one seat at the table?” he asked.