- 24,952
- 23,299
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would you want to be middle class over rich? **** is expensive af out here.
If money would change you that much it’s not the money’s fault.
Will never wrap my head around how the royals are important.
and richer countries have higher suicide rates.
Money is nice, but clearly it isn't everything.
if you are living a solid middle class life, in a rich country, would trade that to live in a cottage on your grandmother's estate and give up almost all personal autonomy
to live a life as a assassination target/ritualistic prop??
maybe you would, im good on that.
We have seen how many well off people kill themselves and y’all still think it would be just peaches and cream being a royal? I mean sure maybe, but that lifestyle does not seem all that at all.
Mental health > wealth
If your wealthy but you hate your life, what difference does it make?
This is kind of a pointless thing to bring up
The suicide rate of British Royals I would assume it very low
Below that of middle-class people in advanced economies
-But there is a serious flaw in using that metric. Even putting aside being a member of the royal familyit seems to me to indicate it's possible to be materially well off and be very unhappy.
and if it's possible saying "Why would you want to be middle class over rich"
doesn't make much sense to me as a rebuttal.
there must be circumstances that exist where you would it would be rational to choose a happy middle class life, over unhappy rich life.
now you may think you'd be happier living as a b teir royal over middle class life,
but life having more money doesn't automatically end the argument.
You telling me you wouldn’t take this over half a milli?This might be worse than the people choosing the dinner with Jay-Z
But there is a serious flaw in using that metric. Even putting aside being a member of the royal family
I don't think anyone was arguing this specific point.im not using it as a metric to prove that harrys life is worse than a middle class life.
im using to show that having money doesn't prevent you from having an unhappy life.
so it doesn't mean it's automatically obvious that Harrys life is better than a middle class life.
if he wasn't using it as an argument ender, well then i guess i misread it.
If it takes 20 minutes to explain why we should get rid of gas stoves probably not going to get a lot people.
Just watch the video.
It explains why the gas industry uses gas stoves to appeal to people's emotional attatchment to gas.
American Public Gas Association hired PR company Porter Novelli to figure out how to manipulate people's emotions enough to keep them using gas.
People don't really care if their furnace, water heater is gas or electric but they do care about their stove.
The goal is to keep people on gas as long as possible even if electric is the better option.
"Emotional arguments can shape the public narrative even when the facts don't support them."
I don't think anyone was arguing this specific point.
I think people, including dude, were just trying to try in the realities, especially economic ones, that middle-class people face that rich people don't
And to make an honest comparison, those things need to be considered