- Feb 8, 2009
- 1,708
- 10
Originally Posted by ksteezy
Ha!...thanx man...do you
:smoke
You mean
Try
:ha t
or
:smoki n
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by ksteezy
Ha!...thanx man...do you
:smoke
Originally Posted by ksteezy
You can get an XS for like 200$ nowadays, best word of advice I can give you is NEVER shop for anything camera related at bestbuy, pcrichards, costco, etc. Always go to BH or use amazon or simply join photography forums which have marketplaces where people have some great deals. We have a camera marketplace in the A&P section on ISS too. For 800$ I think you can get away with a 40d and a kit lense. Good luck....ohh yeah no video recording, you can get that from the canon T1i, but if I was you I'd pass on that for the 40d....you buy a DSLR for stills, not for it's video. Good luck.
In my opinion, everyone eventually will want to go FF. The difference in cropped cameras and FF is quite significant and will broaden how you feelabout your work. I would save your money for the MKII with the kit lens (but the 2.8, not the f/4) and a nifty 50 will work just fine. The 7D is a greatcamera and all, but the image quality is far superior with the 5DMKII. I used to shoot with a 40D, i loved that cammy cam.. but now that i've gone fullframe i could never consider going back. Also, there are "cheaper" full frame lenses that sigma puts out, comparable to Canons "L" line,Sigma has a EX line. For example, i have a FF super wide angle by sigma, a 12-24. If the 500 is not that big of a difference to you, i'd wait it out andsave up.. considering its such a large purchase. The 7D is awesome, but just not THAT awesome when putting it next to the beast, the MKII. If you're moreinterested in video work, then the 7D will do you well.Originally Posted by NikeAirsNCrispyTees
Alright, serious question here for both Nikon and Canon shooters. It's long-winded, but bear with me.
My original plan was to upgrade from the D40x to the Canon 7D. However, after reading a TON of reviews, people are complaining that the IQ hasn't improved, and apparently Sigma lenses aren't 100% compatible with it. I only care about the latter part because after the 24-70 f/2.8, I'm looking into the Sigma 10mm f/2.8 fisheye.
I didn't originally plan on going FF because the breakthroughs in recent sensors has brought high ISO performance a long way as far as low-light photography is concerned. I've been doing some price comparisons, and for an extra $500 or so I could get the 5DmkII with just a standard kit lens for now and the nifty fifty.
SO...5DmkII for a little more money and a little more time, or 7D with L glass sometime in December or January?
Bana, airjordanjack, where you at? I know you're both Canon lovers.
Anyways, ksteezy-- what's the lighting look like for that one with the medical mask? And what kind of PP did you do? Also, that baby is hella cute.
why not recommend the 1Ds Mark III or 1D Mark IV while we're at it?Originally Posted by ksteezy
ohh and i wouldnt recommend a 5dmkII to someone who has never shot with a DSLR, although he took some classes and has used a film camera, a mkII wouldnt be the top choice to a digital newcomer...C'mon!
Originally Posted by DJ bana
i didnt read that hes never owned a dslr, oops.
then you could def get a lower-end cam and move up when you're ready. i have a friend who knows NOTHING about photog and she's seen my work... based on my stuff she went and bought a 5DMKII, remember.. its a fully manual camera with only 1 auto option and it doesn't come with a flash. now she has a 3K setup and doesnt know where to start.. i told her to get a 7D but she didn't listen. she was on the "ill learn" tip... but now she's regretting it. just because you have an awesome cam doesn't mean your pics will come out great! you gotta practice, trial and error.
'
edit- wait, in the beginning of his post he says hes upgrading from a Nikon... so uh, yea.. i'll stick to my original advice of copping the 5D.
i think the user you're referring to is not the same one i'm talking to.Originally Posted by ksteezy
Originally Posted by DJ bana
i didnt read that hes never owned a dslr, oops.
then you could def get a lower-end cam and move up when you're ready. i have a friend who knows NOTHING about photog and she's seen my work... based on my stuff she went and bought a 5DMKII, remember.. its a fully manual camera with only 1 auto option and it doesn't come with a flash. now she has a 3K setup and doesnt know where to start.. i told her to get a 7D but she didn't listen. she was on the "ill learn" tip... but now she's regretting it. just because you have an awesome cam doesn't mean your pics will come out great! you gotta practice, trial and error.
'
edit- wait, in the beginning of his post he says hes upgrading from a Nikon... so uh, yea.. i'll stick to my original advice of copping the 5D.
idk bana, the op sounds iexperienced still, and he did mention hes not a complete noob, but still. If you are ready to make the jump to a 5dmkii or a 1ds or any other PRO body, i dont think you'll be making a thread like this in a sneaker oriented forum, where there is only one thread dedicated to photography....i think the OP is more concern with the video capability of his camera than what it can actually offer as a camera for stills....good luck on your purchase OP.
Originally Posted by DJ bana
well, you completely missed my response about purchasing a 5D.. i had quoted a user upgrading to a larger body that asked for my personal advice. he wanted help with a 7D vs. a 5DII.
then you knocked my response down, twice, not realizing i was directing my answer to a different user.
i questioned myself, only to realize i wasn't wrong.