- 7,595
- 2,466
Originally Posted by abeautifulhaze
Originally Posted by JohnnyRedStorm
Danillo is not soft, and I can't comment on his defense( if its anything like the rest of the Italian league its non-existent(what else is new to D'antoni and the Knicks))
But this is what I said earlier on in the post
After watching that tape I have come to these conclusions about the Italian
He has very good fotwork
Needs to get stronger
Will get bodied on the block
He is not, and I repeat he does not look soft at all
Decent finisher and more athletic than thought
The defense in Italy is atrocious
Has a pretty good IQ
Will not be a great rebounder unless he gets stronger
Good jab step
Reads defenses well
Lacks explosiveness
On the next level he will be a solid player, probably average 15, 16, 17 points on a terrible team. The comparisons to Kukoc are pretty solid. Does this mean I want the Italian? Not if Westbrook, Bayless or Mayo are on the board. He is going to be a good player, but I don't see us taking him with the probability that Bayless will be on the board. First time watching him up there and I was pretty impressed, he won't be a stiff or a dud.
Has to use the up and under move in the post or turn around fadeaways because of his lack of strength
After thinking about it, he's going to be a good player and I like his skill set. But he isn't what we needed and I much rather have Bayless, but he won't be a bust and end up like Darko. In 3 years he'll be a solid player. Maybe he'll even stop Shaq. Who knows.
HUH?!
You high?
probably only because Shaq wont be in the league 3 years from now