The one commonality in the Lakers three consecutive trips to the Finals was that they were the No. 1 seed in the West each year. And the commonality in their two consecutive championships is that they had home court advantage in the Finals. When they lost in 2008, the Celtics were the higher seed.
Bryant has his own theory, however, of what overtaking the Spurs could mean for the Lakers.
"It means nothing," he said Friday night.
A couple weeks ago he claimed, "Home court advantage to me is overrated." He explained that in his mind, the Lakers didn't have home court advantage against Boston in the Finals last season because after L.A. dropped one of the first two games at Staples Center, the rest of the Finals was a best-of-five series with three of those games hosted by the Celtics.
Bryant genuinely believes that and he has first-hand experience in the true road team winning in the 2-3-2 Finals format as the Detroit Pistons beat his Lakers in 2004 as the lower seed.
But Jackson has his own reasons for not putting too much stock in catching the Spurs quite yet.
"It's simply this," Jackson said. "We've played very well [but] you can go out and have a stinker like we had in the first half [Friday] and lose a ball game, not have that energy in the second half to come back and win. It's asking a lot of a team to continue at that pace and expect them to play at that pace. We want to do it and have every urgency to do it, but the odds are against us. It's still a real tough thing to do."
Link:
http://sports.espn.go.com...columns/story?id=6284477