Official Air Jordan Retro I WHITE/RED/BLK Thread JAN 2013

[rafool]

I could forgive JB for dropping the ball with the Nike Air fiasco for $110 for these.

 

[sthebest]

True. The 94/95 pair cushion around the ankle doesn't get stiff after awhile, but they are hella uncomfortable IMO. I'll practice on a pair of my old 1's. Worst case scenario I'll just paint the Jumpman read with angelus paint to be less detectable.

DEFINITELY a good investment. I had both colorways of the 1994 retros and I like the fact the leather doesnt turn rock hard like on the OGs. Also the ankle cushioning is much better than the OGs. I kept my Chicagos but sold my Breds due to me having Banned 1s (which had way better ankle padding and comfort than the 1994s)

 

[airthompson]

I could forgive JB for dropping the ball with the Nike Air fiasco for $110 for these.

True that. They're only 110 is a easy cop. $140, then they'd be pushing the envelope.

True. The 94/95 pair cushion around the ankle doesn't get stiff after awhile, but they are hella uncomfortable IMO. I'll practice on a pair of my old 1's. Worst case scenario I'll just paint the Jumpman read with angelus paint to be less detectable.

DEFINITELY a good investment. I had both colorways of the 1994 retros and I like the fact the leather doesnt turn rock hard like on the OGs. Also the ankle cushioning is much better than the OGs. I kept my Chicagos but sold my Breds due to me having Banned 1s (which had way better ankle padding and comfort than the 1994s)

94's are def nice. I like their mold much better then the 85's. That thick ankle lining

 

[trueprada]

Ill cop specially at that price

 

[marley]

I am questioning that release date because no one has early release pairs of these yet except marquee and as usual all they have is little sizes. I have checked a dozen sites that normally have early stuff and no one has these. There's V's and 13's out there already but none of the I's. anyone seen them anywhere yet?

 

[bigpoint]

I could forgive JB for dropping the ball with the Nike Air fiasco for $110 for these.

THIS!

 

[mjshoefanatic]

I will never forgive JB for doing that to these.


94s or bust!

 

[bigpoint]

Damn 

, MN took David Choi's pics and didn't give him any love. Tag your pics fellas....

 

[tony906]

how bout JB retro the Price

 

[frenchblue23]

how bout JB retro the Price

This!!

 

[sunshineblotters]

how bout JB retro the Price

LOL!
It's only fair.

 

[ollly]

copped, the jumpman on the tongue takes away from it I can overlook that

 

[sunshineblotters]

The jumpman on the tongue never bothered me. Its the one on the heel that bothers me.

 

[rcjbbp1313]

ditto sunshine, i hate the jumpman on the heel. stuipid to have a jiant nike swoosh and then the heel have the jumpman

 

[scoop0625]

Now $140.00 retail price for Air Jordan 1's has become absurd. Especially when the 2001 retros were $80.00. That is a $60.00 price increase from the retros, but the originals were cheaper. The $140 price tag is double the originals. I will still cop a pair to go with my 1994's.

 

[scoop0625]

how bout JB retro the Price

Yes Sir!!! $65.00 is the way to go... I know that it is wishful thinking.

 

[manslayer]

Banneds were $125 when they dropped last year. So $15 increase for a shoe with inferior quality?

Nah, i'm good

 

[justforsneaks]

they're dropping on New Years Eve instead of January.

 

[frenchblue23]

These are seriously $140??

 

[sir charles]

These would have been a better idea for the February release...

 

[sho3tym]

still want em...

12/31 is set?

 

[Bert.]

The jumpman on the tongue never bothered me. Its the one on the heel that bothers me.

opposite for me

 

[Bert.]

so is it $110 or $140?

 

[airthompson]

$110

 

[definition of dopeness]

still want em...

12/31 is set?

Answer this man.