smh. why i havent purchased any of the 4's. i miss my military IV's from 06
See. More proof that ppl don't really know what they are talking about.
The previous Military IVs are widely understood to be among the worst quality JB retros of all time. Now, we have people opining for them.
You have the blind leading the blind on here. As Cold City said, people just piggy backing on others' attempts to pick apart the shoe because it makes them feel like they are OG or something.
Look, I'm not going to claim that this shoe is $160 shoe quality; it is not. But, it's not because of these tiny, tiny imperfections that so many of you struggle to find and then post pics of like there's some glaring error. What you guys complain about is evidence of your own noob-ishness. You just know that you're supposed to complain about something, but you don't know what, so you make up and guess... and you get all the wrong stuff.
The overall quality of the materials - all the materials - are vastly inferior to OGs and early retros. In most cases, the shape of the shoes is off. Those are the major issues.
They are going to get dirty and crease a bit when you - YELP - wear them! So, that is not really a problem. It's the construction and design of the shoe - the structural quality and integrity - not the aesthetics of it that is the true evidence of corner-cutting and the precipitous drop from premium material shoe to pseudo-plastic, disposable trash.
But, I don't really complain usually. Why? If I like the shoe enough to buy it, I'm voting with my wallet. Sometimes I accept an inferior product because I want it enough and sometimes I don't. If you're not going to be happy with them, don't buy them. Or return them. If you are keeping them, then don't really complain because it apparently isn't serious enough for you to forego them.