***OFFICIAL 2021 FANTASY FOOTBALL THREAD***

[s0lefunk]

I have the 3rd waiver priority with the 1st and 2nd being solid at RB. Should I put a claim in for Damien Williams? My RBs are Gibson, Mike Davis, Elijah Mitchell, Javonte Williams, and Jeff Wilson (IR). No notable RB handcuffs remaining on the wire.

 

[kicks2024]

I have the 3rd waiver priority with the 1st and 2nd being solid at RB. Should I put a claim in for Damien Williams? My RBs are Gibson, Mike Davis, Elijah Mitchell, Javonte Williams, and Jeff Wilson (IR). No notable RB handcuffs remaining on the wire.

Yes you can try and trade him to DMont owner or anyone needing a RB

 

[6 Rings G.O.A.T.]

2-0 this week..

 

[JusaVibe]

Damn I got Buffalo D against the Chiefs next Sunday. They are ranked #1 but I may bench them but I got a feeling they make a statement against the Chiefs

 

[Liquid Swords]

Got Bills defense but also picked LV def right before MNF. Chiefs putting up numbers as always

 

[Liquid Swords]

Locked up Damien Williams for upcoming bye weeks. Hopefully he produces like Monty

 

[Hank Scorpio]

Trying to get my league to veto this trade....Am I tweakin?

 

[kicks2024]

Leaning towards Dallas or Ravens, maybe Steelers idk bout them

 

[getback]

Tough one: Matt Ryan or Matthew Stafford?

 

[s0lefunk]

Hank Scorpio My stance is vetos should be saved for clear signs of collusion and anticompetitive behavior, not bad trades. Just because it isn't a trade I would do personally doesn't mean its worthy of a veto. At face value it just looks like someone traded top 3 TE + top 18 WR upside for a proven top 2 QB and an unproven rookie TE with upside.

All you can do is state your case and hope the majority agrees.

 

[steebie j]

Trying to get my league to veto this trade....Am I tweakin?

The team that’s trading Mahomes, who is their back up qb?

 

[Hank Scorpio]

The team that’s trading Mahomes, who is their back up qb?

Daniel Jones

 

[steebie j]

Tough one: Matt Ryan or Matthew Stafford?

Stafford for sure

 

[steebie j]

Daniel Jones

Oh hell no

that trade doesn’t make sense for him. I could see if he also has another top 5 qb but he going with Jones ROS? Nah

 

[kicks2024]

Bad trades are made all the time, let it be. If this was week 10 or later than I’d maybe feel different but Id leave it alone

 

[kicks2024]

Leaning towards Dallas or Ravens, maybe Steelers idk bout them

Considering Panthers now with the Gilmore trade

 

[steebie j]

Leaning towards Dallas or Ravens, maybe Steelers idk bout them

I wanna say ATL but I fell into that trap playing the Titans last week.

I would go with Ravens

 

[kicks2024]

I wanna say ATL but I fell into that trap playing the Titans last week.

I would go with Ravens

hell nah. I watch us every week idc who we play I will never trust my defens until we actually do something in real life to make it better.

only thing they have going for them is Rookie WB, first win last week, and now first trip to London

sounds good but I can’t do it

 

[s0lefunk]

Oh hell no

that trade doesn’t make sense for him. I could see if he also has another top 5 qb but he going with Jones ROS? Nah

FWIW, Jones is a top 7 QB so far, 5 total points below the #5 which is Carr

 

[Hank Scorpio]

Oh hell no

that trade doesn’t make sense for him. I could see if he also has another top 5 qb but he going with Jones ROS? Nah

Exactly...the guy who's trading Maholmes is also 0-4 as well.

There's def. collusion that's involved in this trade

s0lefunk

 

[steebie j]

That’s cool if Jones top 7 QB thru 4 weeks. But will he finish top 5 ROS?

 

[tpfltxl]

Hank Scorpio My stance is vetos should be saved for clear signs of collusion and anticompetitive behavior, not bad trades. Just because it isn't a trade I would do personally doesn't mean its worthy of a veto. At face value it just looks like someone traded top 3 TE + top 18 WR upside for a proven top 2 QB and an unproven rookie TE with upside.

All you can do is state your case and hope the majority agrees.

This!

So glad most of my leagues removed vetos, people used to veto just so no one can get better I'm also fortunate that those leagues have been together for a while now.

When you factor league scoring (looks like 4 point pass TD and full PPR) that trade isn't as bad. At 0-4, I'd shop Mahomes too.

 

[FreshLeeLA]

Trying to get my league to veto this trade....Am I tweakin?

This trade is trash but not worthy of being vetoed.

Pitts has done nothing so far

 

[s0lefunk]

steebie j Top 5? I wouldn't bet on it. Top 8 with a healthy Saquan and WRs? Very possible. Ryan Tannehill finished as a top 7 QB last season after being outside the top 20 the year prior. Jones has rushing upside and hasn't turned into Danny Donations (yet). At some point you have to look past the name and look at the numbers. "Bad" players on bad teams still have fantasy value.

Hank Scorpio If the Mahomes owner traded to the 1st place team for RB/WR3s and 4s then I'd suspect collusion. But two winless teams involved in week 5 trying to turn their seasons around? Fair. Kittle and CeeDee at least have upside and are big names. Not a good trade to me but it isn't anticompetitive.

tpfltxl I was in a similar league that eventually folded. Let people trade and come up. Don't get mad when a player you wanted gets traded. Make an offer, negotiate, hope for the best.

 

[ozboi]

Had to pick up Perine coz I have Mixon… just dropped Perine for Collins