- Jun 24, 2005
- 17,326
- 3,613
There has GOT TO BE less than 9,000 people at this Hawks game.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by koolbarbone
Point #1: Cassell > Hudson.Originally Posted by CP1708
I'm sort of confused by what you guys are getting at. Hudson was knockin down shots left and right. He wasn't going to hit them if Cassell was out there, and no way to know if Cassell was gonna hit the same shots Troy was, so what're we doin here? And neither of them were stoppin Kareem Friggin Rush from doing anything, so what exactly is the point? Cassell's 3's would be more painful for us or what?Originally Posted by koolbarbone
Troy Hudson balled against the Lakers in 2003, but Cassell was on a whole different level. That loss hurt Minnesota big time. But let's keep talking about Karl Malone.They weren't gonna play Troy and Sam together, so I mean.......
Point #2: Cassell > Hudson > Hoiberg. Two of those three were out against the Lakers. I think that made a difference.
Point #3: If you are going to talk about how the loss of Malone's paltry numbers affected the Lakers' championship potential, the same argument can be made for Cassell.
Originally Posted by koolbarbone
Point #1: Cassell > Hudson.Originally Posted by CP1708
I'm sort of confused by what you guys are getting at. Hudson was knockin down shots left and right. He wasn't going to hit them if Cassell was out there, and no way to know if Cassell was gonna hit the same shots Troy was, so what're we doin here? And neither of them were stoppin Kareem Friggin Rush from doing anything, so what exactly is the point? Cassell's 3's would be more painful for us or what?Originally Posted by koolbarbone
Troy Hudson balled against the Lakers in 2003, but Cassell was on a whole different level. That loss hurt Minnesota big time. But let's keep talking about Karl Malone.They weren't gonna play Troy and Sam together, so I mean.......
Point #2: Cassell > Hudson > Hoiberg. Two of those three were out against the Lakers. I think that made a difference.
Point #3: If you are going to talk about how the loss of Malone's paltry numbers affected the Lakers' championship potential, the same argument can be made for Cassell.
Hudson balled in 2003. He never played against the Lakers in 2004. Hoiberg was PG #3. Would it have mattered if Hudson was available? I don't know. But the falloff from Cassell to Hoiberg was much greater than the fallout from Malone to Slava. Now we can move on.Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by koolbarbone
Point #1: Cassell > Hudson.Originally Posted by CP1708
I'm sort of confused by what you guys are getting at. Hudson was knockin down shots left and right. He wasn't going to hit them if Cassell was out there, and no way to know if Cassell was gonna hit the same shots Troy was, so what're we doin here? And neither of them were stoppin Kareem Friggin Rush from doing anything, so what exactly is the point? Cassell's 3's would be more painful for us or what?Originally Posted by koolbarbone
Troy Hudson balled against the Lakers in 2003, but Cassell was on a whole different level. That loss hurt Minnesota big time. But let's keep talking about Karl Malone.They weren't gonna play Troy and Sam together, so I mean.......
Point #2: Cassell > Hudson > Hoiberg. Two of those three were out against the Lakers. I think that made a difference.
Point #3: If you are going to talk about how the loss of Malone's paltry numbers affected the Lakers' championship potential, the same argument can be made for Cassell.
Agreed Cassell > Hudson.
Now, may I?
Malone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Slava God Damn Medvedenko.
See what I'm gettin at there?
Troy did work. Is Sam better? Yes. But Troy did a damn good job in that series, and torched the hell out of us. Do we all agree with that? Yes.
Slava, sadly, did NOT do work, unless you count his work for the Detroit Pistons. The fall off was MASSIVE.
So now can you relax on the small meaningless comment I made when talkin about the 04 series? I was merely countering a point made my JA, one I wish I hadn't made now since I have to bring up Slava Medvedenko for any damn reason.
Also note, since we doin this, Horace Grant was also out. Slava was PF #3.
We shouldn't have lost that series regardless, there is no doubt. Kobe and Shaq fighting like girls was ridiculous and horribly bad timing. It was an epic failure. However, Karl Malone being out of the series KILLED any chance we would have had under normal playing conditions. Sheed had been pushed around by the Lakers FOR YEARS with the likes of AC Green, Horace Grant, and Robert Horry. Sheed wouldn't go in the paint against us on a breakaway those years.But once he saw Slava out there, he went willy nilly on our @#$.
Hudson balled in 2003. He never played against the Lakers in 2004. Hoiberg was PG #3. Would it have mattered if Hudson was available? I don't know. But the falloff from Cassell to Hoiberg was much greater than the fallout from Malone to Slava. Now we can move on.Originally Posted by CP1708
Originally Posted by koolbarbone
Point #1: Cassell > Hudson.Originally Posted by CP1708
I'm sort of confused by what you guys are getting at. Hudson was knockin down shots left and right. He wasn't going to hit them if Cassell was out there, and no way to know if Cassell was gonna hit the same shots Troy was, so what're we doin here? And neither of them were stoppin Kareem Friggin Rush from doing anything, so what exactly is the point? Cassell's 3's would be more painful for us or what?Originally Posted by koolbarbone
Troy Hudson balled against the Lakers in 2003, but Cassell was on a whole different level. That loss hurt Minnesota big time. But let's keep talking about Karl Malone.They weren't gonna play Troy and Sam together, so I mean.......
Point #2: Cassell > Hudson > Hoiberg. Two of those three were out against the Lakers. I think that made a difference.
Point #3: If you are going to talk about how the loss of Malone's paltry numbers affected the Lakers' championship potential, the same argument can be made for Cassell.
Agreed Cassell > Hudson.
Now, may I?
Malone >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Slava God Damn Medvedenko.
See what I'm gettin at there?
Troy did work. Is Sam better? Yes. But Troy did a damn good job in that series, and torched the hell out of us. Do we all agree with that? Yes.
Slava, sadly, did NOT do work, unless you count his work for the Detroit Pistons. The fall off was MASSIVE.
So now can you relax on the small meaningless comment I made when talkin about the 04 series? I was merely countering a point made my JA, one I wish I hadn't made now since I have to bring up Slava Medvedenko for any damn reason.
Also note, since we doin this, Horace Grant was also out. Slava was PF #3.
We shouldn't have lost that series regardless, there is no doubt. Kobe and Shaq fighting like girls was ridiculous and horribly bad timing. It was an epic failure. However, Karl Malone being out of the series KILLED any chance we would have had under normal playing conditions. Sheed had been pushed around by the Lakers FOR YEARS with the likes of AC Green, Horace Grant, and Robert Horry. Sheed wouldn't go in the paint against us on a breakaway those years.But once he saw Slava out there, he went willy nilly on our @#$.
T-Mac having a higher FG% than Kobe this year. Kobe getting old.Originally Posted by E3LAL
Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams
Kevin Durant been "exposed" this season! That is NT for you.
Not hate but what has 'Reke been up too? Seems like he regressed from last year.
T-Mac having a higher FG% than Kobe this year. Kobe getting old.Originally Posted by E3LAL
Originally Posted by nicedudewithnicedreams
Kevin Durant been "exposed" this season! That is NT for you.
Not hate but what has 'Reke been up too? Seems like he regressed from last year.
Originally Posted by JPZx
The Timberwolves had Darrick Martin starting for them in that series.
He hadn't started a game in nearly five years up to that series.
Darrick *+@+$#% Martin.
Originally Posted by JPZx
The Timberwolves had Darrick Martin starting for them in that series.
He hadn't started a game in nearly five years up to that series.
Darrick *+@+$#% Martin.