Official 2009 NCAA Tournament Thread. The Very Best Have Gathered Upon One Stage.

laugh.gif


I'm going to sleep.
 
Originally Posted by dreClark

Originally Posted by jville819

Originally Posted by dreClark

Originally Posted by jville819

Originally Posted by dreClark

When UNC is hitting their 3's, they can't be beat.

The same can be said for almost every team.
No it can't.
So you don't think if any team out there is hitting 50-60% from 3 they're are not winning the game
eyes.gif
You can shoot 50% from three and if you only have ONE shooter y'all ain't winning the game.

If you got 4 shooters putting up 50% from 3 AND you got 3 on the block then you're gonna win.
I wasn't suggesting it as only having 1 shooter. I took it as all players on the floor hitting above 50% from 3, no matter if they'reshooters or not.

My bad on the interpretation
 
Originally Posted by Craftsy21

Originally Posted by LESGodSonC0


How do ya'll think this team would match up against the 05' team?

Personally, I believe Ellington and Lawson are a better backcourt than McCants and Felton were. On the flipside, I thought Sean May was a better college player than Psycho T is.
i think '05 was superior, by a decent margin.
cosign.

that team was not as vulnerable defensively as this year's team has looked (at some points).

and that Illinois team they beat in the championship was pretty epic.
 
Originally Posted by Craftsy21

Originally Posted by LESGodSonC0


How do ya'll think this team would match up against the 05' team?

Personally, I believe Ellington and Lawson are a better backcourt than McCants and Felton were. On the flipside, I thought Sean May was a better college player than Psycho T is.
i think '05 was superior, by a decent margin.
Lawson>Felton
McCants>Ellington
 
damn..anybody see that stat?

unc has like 20 more ft's MADE than their opponents attempts combined
 
Originally Posted by dreClark

It's all relative to the number of shooters you have.
this makes no sense.. 50 percent is 50 percent... are you trying to say it's relative to the number of shots you take? If one guy shoots 10for 20, how is that different than 5 guys shooting 2 -4?
 
craftsy, shot 63% from the floor and 56% from 3 against Davidson. LOL.

Ed Davis might as well go pro.
 
eek.gif
forgot all about the game, just saw it on my boys FB status.

eek.gif
@ the score.

eek.gif
@ Hansborough. .......

dude looks like a walking photoshop. body of a man. face of a fetus.
 
Ahhh i wish hansborough played for another team so I could be happy w/ Lawson and these other guys winning this ship, UNC got detroit on hush
laugh.gif
 
Originally Posted by Craftsy21

Originally Posted by dreClark

It's all relative to the number of shooters you have.
this makes no sense.. 50 percent is 50 percent... are you trying to say it's relative to the number of shots you take? If one guy shoots 10 for 20, how is that different than 5 guys shooting 2 -4?
Jesus Christ

More shooters = potential for more 3 pointers made

How is that hard to understand?

A team w/ one guy that goes 10 for 20 < a team w/ 5 guys that go 4 for 8
Ed Davis might as well go pro.
Truth!
 
picard-sigh.jpg



dreClark wrote:
It's all relative to the number of shooters you have.

this makes no sense.. 50 percent is 50 percent... are you trying to say it's relative to the number of shots you take? If one guy shoots 10 for 20, how is that different than 5 guys shooting 2 -4?
its a pointless arguement, stop lol...
 
Originally Posted by GUILLERMO GUTIEREZ

eek.gif
forgot all about the game, just saw it on my boys FB status.

eek.gif
@ the score.

eek.gif
@ Hansborough. .......

dude looks like a walking photoshop. body of a man. face of a fetus.

I chuckled.
 
Ed Davis coming out party.
pimp.gif


after this game, the chances of him coming back will significantly decrease..
laugh.gif
 
WHAT THE HELL IS SUTON DOING?!


alien.gif


DID HE REALLY JUST STAND THERE AND WATCH THE BALL BOUNCE INTO GREEN'S HANDS?!
 
Back
Top Bottom