- Mar 15, 2006
- 3,582
- 813
We still *** tho.
NYK '14 offseason thread
- Thread in 'Sports & Training' Thread starter Started by pr0phecy718,
- Start date
- May 3, 2013
- 8,790
- 1,989
Why did the front office trade for Bargani? Honest question? I never understood that trade.
- Feb 9, 2003
- 10,791
- 932
Because he provided everything we didn't need.
Last edited:
- Dec 7, 2006
- 12,393
- 7,890
it made sense financially. they gave novak and camby too much money when they barely contributed. so they decided to trade for bargs. he spreads the floor which gives melo more space in the paint. he is also willing to shoot, unlike shump who will play 30min and only attempt a handful of shots (only took 3 last night). defensively, bargs is a liability, but hes a huge improvement over novak and at least he can rebound a little.
- Sep 21, 2008
- 49,029
- 61,330
I miss Novak
- Jul 17, 2013
- 731
- 257
would y'all rather play Indiana or MIA in the first round if we get the 8th seed ??
- Sep 21, 2008
- 49,029
- 61,330
Numbers never lie is getting me hype about a potential pairing between Phil , Melo , and the triangle offense .
- Sep 21, 2008
- 49,029
- 61,330
Indiana
- Jul 16, 2002
- 30,789
- 5,793
Edit: bleep this season...this team is gonna let us down regardless what happens.
Last edited:
- May 8, 2012
- 10,486
- 7,202
- Nov 15, 2007
- 7,906
- 2,188
I mean maybe Phil is the one guy who will get Dolan out of the way but there is just no way I believe this works out well. Things don't work out well for this team. It just doesn't happen.
- Mar 25, 2009
- 4,775
- 1,339
I thought the triangle focus mainly on passing bigs? Who is our big man passing amare? Chandler?
- Nov 26, 2007
- 10,123
- 4,223
- Dec 4, 2012
- 935
- 319
Phil, what's good, bruh?
We want answers
We want answers
- Feb 10, 2008
- 17,773
- 9,625
We were suppose to get answers by today? 
- May 8, 2012
- 10,486
- 7,202
Reports saying end of the this week/beginning of next week.
- Jul 18, 2012
- 32,800
- 19,699
you'd think we'd get wise to this, but no
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,871
- 50,390
These guys are not going to be on the team regardless of Phil and the triangle.
Last edited:
- Feb 9, 2003
- 10,791
- 932
This. There will be a complete overhaul of the team. Probably 3-4 players max will remain.
- Jul 7, 2011
- 7,728
- 3,808
Not really.
Shaq was a decent passer and Pau a great one from the center position but Longley and Wennington before them, were not.
That's why the forwards and the SG became the primary initiator of offense during the Chicago years.
It's all about the spacing created by the triangle.
Every one becomes a willing passer because of the spacing dictated by player position and movement.
- Sep 1, 2012
- 3,142
- 1,904
this team will look completely different next year
- Dec 2, 2012
- 688
- 83
The Knicks are finalizing the deal w/ Phil.
http://m.espn.go.com/general/story?storyId=10588672&city=newyork&src=desktop
http://m.espn.go.com/general/story?storyId=10588672&city=newyork&src=desktop
Last edited:
- May 22, 2013
- 4,138
- 512
Left this thread a week back...but now I'm back. Super hyped about Phil Jackson. **** DOLAN
Are they going to be able to do it this off season? I would imagine no one would want their spare parts now and only until the next trading deadline. I'd guess the next off season is when they start to move forward again. Next year is looking like another wash.
- Dec 2, 2012
- 688
- 83
Teams who want cap space love expiring contracts. & we have a few going into next season.
