NT Common Response: "I See Girls That Looks Just As Good/Better Than Her Daily"

[larrydavidswag]

im saying that her getting on the show was due to her being atypically gorgeous.

yes, at 14. (season 1 of that 70s show)

i am also saying that any other atypically gorgeous "actress" could have gotten that part...

there wasnt anything special about her acting ability....her character was a sexy airhead...who can't play a sexy airhead?

(granted, i like her acting and voice, but im saying...)

trying to say mila kunis wasnt hired on that 70s show cause she's atypically attractive is goofy to me...

yes, the 10 percent is a made up figure...you know why? attractiveness is relative. its not a tangible attribute.

dude just said "thats a lie" to mila kunis being atypically gorgeous.....so, yes, its a made up number just like this debate is over a made-up attribute...

if we rate girls 1-10, why wouldnt the top 10 percent be the 10s? i mean, that's just being statistically equal.....

but imma go ahead and tap out. again, my opinion is being contradicted by irrelevant side-arguments...

"there's way more than 10 percent of atypically, celebrity-level attractive females in the world." okay, whatever.

(btw, i was in miami, on south beach, for around 5 days....saw not one "famous" level beauty, $%%%, the girl moon kicked it with at NTFL was the baddest chick i saw the entire time down there..... i go to NYC often, never even seen a girl outside looking better than sara....who is foxy....just FYI)

so props to you dudes who see celebrity-level, top 10 percent in world beauty everyday, cause i don't...i know a couple of those broads...but they're not walking down the street daily....they're getting busted off by chad johnson and/or taking "model" pics.....

and that's keeping it 100.

 

[larrydavidswag]

im saying that her getting on the show was due to her being atypically gorgeous.

yes, at 14. (season 1 of that 70s show)

i am also saying that any other atypically gorgeous "actress" could have gotten that part...

there wasnt anything special about her acting ability....her character was a sexy airhead...who can't play a sexy airhead?

(granted, i like her acting and voice, but im saying...)

trying to say mila kunis wasnt hired on that 70s show cause she's atypically attractive is goofy to me...

yes, the 10 percent is a made up figure...you know why? attractiveness is relative. its not a tangible attribute.

dude just said "thats a lie" to mila kunis being atypically gorgeous.....so, yes, its a made up number just like this debate is over a made-up attribute...

if we rate girls 1-10, why wouldnt the top 10 percent be the 10s? i mean, that's just being statistically equal.....

but imma go ahead and tap out. again, my opinion is being contradicted by irrelevant side-arguments...

"there's way more than 10 percent of atypically, celebrity-level attractive females in the world." okay, whatever.

(btw, i was in miami, on south beach, for around 5 days....saw not one "famous" level beauty, $%%%, the girl moon kicked it with at NTFL was the baddest chick i saw the entire time down there..... i go to NYC often, never even seen a girl outside looking better than sara....who is foxy....just FYI)

so props to you dudes who see celebrity-level, top 10 percent in world beauty everyday, cause i don't...i know a couple of those broads...but they're not walking down the street daily....they're getting busted off by chad johnson and/or taking "model" pics.....

and that's keeping it 100.

 

[mister negative]

  This one of those dudes that gets punched in the mouth for talkin all this BS, holding up the rotation... Made up statistics, bs hypotheticals, blah blah blah blah

 

 

[mister negative]

  This one of those dudes that gets punched in the mouth for talkin all this BS, holding up the rotation... Made up statistics, bs hypotheticals, blah blah blah blah

 

 

[larrydavidswag]

Originally Posted by Mister Negative

  This one of those dudes that gets punched in the mouth for talkin all this BS, holding up the rotation... Made up statistics, bs hypotheticals, blah blah blah blah

 

and you one of the dudes who sits in the back, out of the rotation, imagining vivid fairtales of me getting punched in the mouth, which never happen, boy.

made up statistics?

bs hypotheticals?

log out of life, bro.
  

what's the real statistic of percentage of women who are "celebrity" pretty?

go find the real stats, then, nerd.

(you can't, because its a made-up attribute, genius)


*waits to be reported and banned cause yall argue as effectively as elementary school children*

 

[larrydavidswag]

Originally Posted by Mister Negative

  This one of those dudes that gets punched in the mouth for talkin all this BS, holding up the rotation... Made up statistics, bs hypotheticals, blah blah blah blah

 

and you one of the dudes who sits in the back, out of the rotation, imagining vivid fairtales of me getting punched in the mouth, which never happen, boy.

made up statistics?

bs hypotheticals?

log out of life, bro.
  

what's the real statistic of percentage of women who are "celebrity" pretty?

go find the real stats, then, nerd.

(you can't, because its a made-up attribute, genius)


*waits to be reported and banned cause yall argue as effectively as elementary school children*

 

[DCAllAfrican]

Originally Posted by Mister Negative

Would somebody please shut this clown up

How about you go on Greyhound.com and come do it yourself partna

 

[DCAllAfrican]

Originally Posted by Mister Negative

Would somebody please shut this clown up

How about you go on Greyhound.com and come do it yourself partna

 

[larrydavidswag]

Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

Originally Posted by Mister Negative

Would somebody please shut this clown up

How about you go on Greyhound.com and come do it yourself partna

hence "imagining vivid fairtales of me being smacked, which never happen"

where you at, thug?

 

[larrydavidswag]

Originally Posted by DCAllAmerican

Originally Posted by Mister Negative

Would somebody please shut this clown up

How about you go on Greyhound.com and come do it yourself partna

hence "imagining vivid fairtales of me being smacked, which never happen"

where you at, thug?

 

[reduce523]

I dont know why celebs get so hyped. I used to work at a spot where you would see celebs in there normal get up day to day. Trust me when I tell you a celeb is just a regular girl with a makeup artist and good lighting and a stylist. Dont believe the hype.

 

[reduce523]

I dont know why celebs get so hyped. I used to work at a spot where you would see celebs in there normal get up day to day. Trust me when I tell you a celeb is just a regular girl with a makeup artist and good lighting and a stylist. Dont believe the hype.

 

[mister negative]

LMAO no thuggery N's done let DC put the battery in their back I see 

Never said I'd smack you superthug... You just one of them dudes that you meet in life that just spews BS from their mouths (or fingertips in this case). You're really trying to make a compelling argue over "the official percentage of females that are stunning v. regular chicks v. celebrities & using actual numbers...

Im sorry I find that funny but carry on bro

 

[mister negative]

LMAO no thuggery N's done let DC put the battery in their back I see 

Never said I'd smack you superthug... You just one of them dudes that you meet in life that just spews BS from their mouths (or fingertips in this case). You're really trying to make a compelling argue over "the official percentage of females that are stunning v. regular chicks v. celebrities & using actual numbers...

Im sorry I find that funny but carry on bro

 

[larrydavidswag]

actually, im not.

dude said "where did you get the 10 percent?"

i said "i made it up"

far from arguing for an "offical percentage" huh?

seeing how the entire debate is based upon a preference....

i dont see a problem with using arbitrary percentages....

you know, for the sake of an argument?

but your elementary-school level absorbtion of an argument

causes you to see an issue.

its okay, sir, you can live.

and

yeah, DC put a battery in my back.

*checks for slap marks*

 

[larrydavidswag]

actually, im not.

dude said "where did you get the 10 percent?"

i said "i made it up"

far from arguing for an "offical percentage" huh?

seeing how the entire debate is based upon a preference....

i dont see a problem with using arbitrary percentages....

you know, for the sake of an argument?

but your elementary-school level absorbtion of an argument

causes you to see an issue.

its okay, sir, you can live.

and

yeah, DC put a battery in my back.

*checks for slap marks*

 

[oidreez]

Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag

sigh. i was talking to dude who quoted me and said "thats a lie."

mila kunis is prettier than most of the world. why? she's famous off of how pretty she is...

just like all the other chicks who were "eye candy" on whatever venture they participated in...

you dudes are madd funny to say 'celebrities arent any better looking than normal people"

but you take the celebrity-level-beauty "normal people" to argue with.

we're talking about the top 10 percent of women on the planet. some are famous, some arent.

some are strippers/escorts some are models some are doctors some are lawyers

some are mothers some die some are in college

some work as waitresses, some work as secretaries

at the end of the day, they're in the top ten percent of women...

and most of them are famous because of it.

you know some non-famous chicks in the top ten percent of women? great.

she prolly has a big shot at being famous because of it.

come on this 10% you're talking is garbage and you could have said anyone else besides mila kunis. we all probably went to school with girls that we would consider more attractive than celebrities. being a celebrity does not mean you are automatically more attractive than the "average person"

 

[oidreez]

Originally Posted by LarryDavidSwag

sigh. i was talking to dude who quoted me and said "thats a lie."

mila kunis is prettier than most of the world. why? she's famous off of how pretty she is...

just like all the other chicks who were "eye candy" on whatever venture they participated in...

you dudes are madd funny to say 'celebrities arent any better looking than normal people"

but you take the celebrity-level-beauty "normal people" to argue with.

we're talking about the top 10 percent of women on the planet. some are famous, some arent.

some are strippers/escorts some are models some are doctors some are lawyers

some are mothers some die some are in college

some work as waitresses, some work as secretaries

at the end of the day, they're in the top ten percent of women...

and most of them are famous because of it.

you know some non-famous chicks in the top ten percent of women? great.

she prolly has a big shot at being famous because of it.

come on this 10% you're talking is garbage and you could have said anyone else besides mila kunis. we all probably went to school with girls that we would consider more attractive than celebrities. being a celebrity does not mean you are automatically more attractive than the "average person"

 

[mister negative]

What the hell is in Ohio water man...

 

[mister negative]

What the hell is in Ohio water man...

 

[larrydavidswag]

Originally Posted by oidreez

being a celebrity does not mean you are automatically more attractive than the "average person"

actually it does. the "average" person connotation suggests that you are not atypically beautiful.

maybe you mean "not all famous people are atypically attractive"

.....while this is true for comedians, athletes, and anyone with marketability outside of appearance, most actors or actresses (moreso actresses than actors) have to be atypically attractive in order to be successful.

halle berry is famous because she's atypically beautiful. she was discovered because she is more attractive than 99 percent of the earth's population. Kim Kardashian is ONLY a celebrity because of her beauty. she has absolutely no marketable traits outside of being nice to look at. The olsen twins, etc. etc. the list goes on and on and on and on........ Rachel Maddox is a genius, her marketablility has nothing to do with her beauty. do you not see a difference between beyonce and will smith and rachel maddox and monique?

i mean, a HUGE number of "celebrities" these days are only celebrities cause they're sexy.....amber rose? people follow her around and write up reports on this woman......because she looks good. You think jennifer aniston or Jennifer lopez didnt "make it" because they're atypically beautiful, dude?

(and this isnt even my personal opinion, i dont find alot of these women breathtaking....but they're atypically beautiful by society's standards....you MAY know a girl who is atypically beautiful....fine. to say you see "hundreds" "everyday" is a streach, tho....proven by the lack of pictures.)

this is my last post here, because im just repeating myself.

if you can't agree with that argument, we have no reason to exchange debate.

  

@ dudes stuck on 10 percent which i readily agreed was made up, and STILL USING THAT AS THE ONLY WAY TO CONTRADICT MY ARGUMENT

we all probably went to school with girls that we would consider more attractive than celebrities.

we all PROBABLY?

maybe WE ALL didnt.....you know, the doubt you raise with the word "probably"

consider? well, that sounds like an opinion...or that it's relative...meaning, there is no statistic...there is no concrete definition....

what's 'celebrity' beauty to you may not be 'celebrity' beauty to me.

i mean, i think all these skinny white women look the same, its all a toss up...

but im willing to bet Meghan Fox (who constantly has threads made about her) would recieve more "atypically beautiful" votes from men across the nation over ANY chick you went to school with EVER.....

and i dont even think she's bad....at all. but society apparently does...because she's famous and a celebrity off how she looks....

i mean, i guess it could be her genius acting ability.......

 

[larrydavidswag]

Originally Posted by oidreez

being a celebrity does not mean you are automatically more attractive than the "average person"

actually it does. the "average" person connotation suggests that you are not atypically beautiful.

maybe you mean "not all famous people are atypically attractive"

.....while this is true for comedians, athletes, and anyone with marketability outside of appearance, most actors or actresses (moreso actresses than actors) have to be atypically attractive in order to be successful.

halle berry is famous because she's atypically beautiful. she was discovered because she is more attractive than 99 percent of the earth's population. Kim Kardashian is ONLY a celebrity because of her beauty. she has absolutely no marketable traits outside of being nice to look at. The olsen twins, etc. etc. the list goes on and on and on and on........ Rachel Maddox is a genius, her marketablility has nothing to do with her beauty. do you not see a difference between beyonce and will smith and rachel maddox and monique?

i mean, a HUGE number of "celebrities" these days are only celebrities cause they're sexy.....amber rose? people follow her around and write up reports on this woman......because she looks good. You think jennifer aniston or Jennifer lopez didnt "make it" because they're atypically beautiful, dude?

(and this isnt even my personal opinion, i dont find alot of these women breathtaking....but they're atypically beautiful by society's standards....you MAY know a girl who is atypically beautiful....fine. to say you see "hundreds" "everyday" is a streach, tho....proven by the lack of pictures.)

this is my last post here, because im just repeating myself.

if you can't agree with that argument, we have no reason to exchange debate.

  

@ dudes stuck on 10 percent which i readily agreed was made up, and STILL USING THAT AS THE ONLY WAY TO CONTRADICT MY ARGUMENT

we all probably went to school with girls that we would consider more attractive than celebrities.

we all PROBABLY?

maybe WE ALL didnt.....you know, the doubt you raise with the word "probably"

consider? well, that sounds like an opinion...or that it's relative...meaning, there is no statistic...there is no concrete definition....

what's 'celebrity' beauty to you may not be 'celebrity' beauty to me.

i mean, i think all these skinny white women look the same, its all a toss up...

but im willing to bet Meghan Fox (who constantly has threads made about her) would recieve more "atypically beautiful" votes from men across the nation over ANY chick you went to school with EVER.....

and i dont even think she's bad....at all. but society apparently does...because she's famous and a celebrity off how she looks....

i mean, i guess it could be her genius acting ability.......

 

[soversotowel]

if you look good or are "bad"you are more proned to be a celebrity (or put on some type of pedastal). although all people who look good or are"bad" aren't all celebrities.

 

[soversotowel]

if you look good or are "bad"you are more proned to be a celebrity (or put on some type of pedastal). although all people who look good or are"bad" aren't all celebrities.

 

[miamib30514]

The fact that she looks good aided in her being a celebrity.

The average chick you see that is on her level or better has a better chance of being a celebrity

than a busted chick.