larrydavidswag
Banned
- 1,767
- 10
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2011
im saying that her getting on the show was due to her being atypically gorgeous.
yes, at 14. (season 1 of that 70s show)
i am also saying that any other atypically gorgeous "actress" could have gotten that part...
there wasnt anything special about her acting ability....her character was a sexy airhead...who can't play a sexy airhead?
(granted, i like her acting and voice, but im saying...)
trying to say mila kunis wasnt hired on that 70s show cause she's atypically attractive is goofy to me...
yes, the 10 percent is a made up figure...you know why? attractiveness is relative. its not a tangible attribute.
dude just said "thats a lie" to mila kunis being atypically gorgeous.....so, yes, its a made up number just like this debate is over a made-up attribute...
if we rate girls 1-10, why wouldnt the top 10 percent be the 10s? i mean, that's just being statistically equal.....
but imma go ahead and tap out. again, my opinion is being contradicted by irrelevant side-arguments...
"there's way more than 10 percent of atypically, celebrity-level attractive females in the world." okay, whatever.
(btw, i was in miami, on south beach, for around 5 days....saw not one "famous" level beauty, $%%%, the girl moon kicked it with at NTFL was the baddest chick i saw the entire time down there..... i go to NYC often, never even seen a girl outside looking better than sara....who is foxy....just FYI)
so props to you dudes who see celebrity-level, top 10 percent in world beauty everyday, cause i don't...i know a couple of those broads...but they're not walking down the street daily....they're getting busted off by chad johnson and/or taking "model" pics.....
and that's keeping it 100.
yes, at 14. (season 1 of that 70s show)
i am also saying that any other atypically gorgeous "actress" could have gotten that part...
there wasnt anything special about her acting ability....her character was a sexy airhead...who can't play a sexy airhead?
(granted, i like her acting and voice, but im saying...)
trying to say mila kunis wasnt hired on that 70s show cause she's atypically attractive is goofy to me...
yes, the 10 percent is a made up figure...you know why? attractiveness is relative. its not a tangible attribute.
dude just said "thats a lie" to mila kunis being atypically gorgeous.....so, yes, its a made up number just like this debate is over a made-up attribute...
if we rate girls 1-10, why wouldnt the top 10 percent be the 10s? i mean, that's just being statistically equal.....
but imma go ahead and tap out. again, my opinion is being contradicted by irrelevant side-arguments...
"there's way more than 10 percent of atypically, celebrity-level attractive females in the world." okay, whatever.
(btw, i was in miami, on south beach, for around 5 days....saw not one "famous" level beauty, $%%%, the girl moon kicked it with at NTFL was the baddest chick i saw the entire time down there..... i go to NYC often, never even seen a girl outside looking better than sara....who is foxy....just FYI)
so props to you dudes who see celebrity-level, top 10 percent in world beauty everyday, cause i don't...i know a couple of those broads...but they're not walking down the street daily....they're getting busted off by chad johnson and/or taking "model" pics.....
and that's keeping it 100.