Nostradamus 2012 on the History Channel Special...

Originally Posted by Mateen Cleaves

whats religion got to do with 9/11?

The people who bombed us was kinda religious
grin.gif
 
Originally Posted by GotHolesInMySocks

Originally Posted by ThrowedInDaGame

Nostradamus = after the fact predictions.

Like other has stated time and time again. He doesn't predict the future. He makes very vague statements which other interpret as predictions after a significant event has occurred.

The event occurs then people attempt to match the event to a Nostradamus prediction.
yea i remember pen and teller talkin about this...

basically dude said that why didnt nobody talk about this before 9/11 so that maybe it coulda been prevented..

but his predictions are interesting even tho

Yea, that's my biggest problem with Nostradamus. Everything they use his quotes for are after the fact. I mean I understand they use it because some ofthose ties make sense. But Wasnt the world suppose dto end back in 99 in July or August. All the Nostradamus fanatics said that it would then. Yet the daycame and went.

Now the way they describe his predictions in the new one makes more sense. Because they actually try to use science to possibly explain it. But even thenit's still a reach IMO. We'll find out on December 21, 2012. Until then I'm living my life like nothing is going to happen. Astrology, thescience, can explain a lot. But we still don't know enough to actually be able to explain it.
 
If ya'll like Nostradamus you will love St. Malachy. First hit when typed into google http://www.catholic-pages.com/grabbag/malachy.asphttp://www.catholic-pages.com/grabbag/malachy.asp if you go into it, it shows how he coincidentallypredicted the popes after it happened.

(From the Catholic Encyclopedia 1913 edition)
The most famous and best known prophecies about the popes are those attributed to St. Malachy. In 1139 he went to Rome to give an account of the affairs of hisdiocese to the pope, Innocent II, who promised him two palliums for the metropolitan Sees of Armagh and Cashel. While at Rome, he received (according to theAbbé Cucherat) the strange vision of the future wherein was unfolded before his mind the long list of illustrious pontiffs who were to rule the Church untilthe end of time. The same author tells us that St. Malachy gave his manuscript to Innocent II to console him in the midst of his tribulations, and that thedocument remained unknown in the Roman Archives until its discovery in 1590 (Cucherat, "Proph. de la succession des papes", ch. xv). They were firstpublished by Arnold de Wyon, and ever since there has been much discussion as to whether they are genuine predictions of St. Malachy or forgeries. The silenceof 400 years on the part of so many learned authors who had written about the popes, and the silence of St. Bernard especially, who wrote the "Life of St.Malachy", is a strong argument against their authenticity, but it is not conclusive if we adopt Cucherat's theory that they were hidden in theArchives during those 400 years.

These short prophetical announcements, in number 112, indicate some noticeable trait of all future popes from Celestine II, who was elected in the year 1130,until the end of the world. They are enunciated under mystical titles. Those who have undertaken to interpret and explain these symbolical prophecies havesucceeded in discovering some trait, allusion, point, or similitude in their application to the individual popes, either as to their country, their name, theircoat of arms or insignia, their birth-place, their talent or learning, the title of their cardinalate, the dignities which they held etc. For example, theprophecy concerning Urban VIII is Lilium et Rosa (the lily and the rose); he was a native of Florence and on the arms of Florence figured a fleur-de-lis; hehad three bees emblazoned on his escutcheon, and the bees gather honey from the lilies and roses. Again, the name accords often with some remarkable and rarecircumstance in the pope's career; thus Peregrinus apostolicus (pilgrim pope), which designates Pius VI, appears to be verified by his journey when popeinto Germany, by his long career as pope, and by his expatriation from Rome at the end of his pontificate. Those who have lived and followed the course ofevents in an intelligent manner during the pontificates of Pius IX, Leo XIII, and Pius X cannot fail to be impressed with the titles given to each by theprophecies of St. Malachy and their wonderful appropriateness: Crux de Cruce (Cross from a Cross) Pius IX; Lumen in cælo (Light in the Sky) Leo XIII; Ignisardens (Burning Fire) Pius X. There is something more than coincidence in the designations given to these three popes so many hundred years before their time.We need not have recourse either to the family names, armorial bearings or cardinalatial titles, to see the fitness of their designations as given in theprophecies. The afflictions and crosses of Pius IX were more than fell to the lot of his predecessors; and the more aggravating of these crosses were broughton by the House of Savoy whose emblem was a cross. Leo XIII was a veritable luminary of the papacy. The present pope is truly a burning fire of zeal for therestoration of all things to Christ.

The last of these prophecies concerns the end of the world and is as follows: "In the final persecution of the Holy Roman Church there will reign Peterthe Roman, who will feed his flock amid many tribulations, after which the seven-hilled city will be destroyed and the dreadful Judge will judge the people.The End." It has been noticed concerning Petrus Romanus, who according to St. Malachy's list is to be the last pope, that the prophecy does not saythat no popes will intervene between him and his predecessor designated Gloria olivæ. It merely says that he is to be the last, so that we may suppose as manypopes as we please before "Peter the Roman". Cornelius a Lapide refers to this prophecy in his commentary "On the Gospel of St. John" (C.xvi) and "On the Apocalypse" (cc. xvii-xx), and he endeavours to calculate according to it the remaining years of time.
 
lol I don't believe this garb neither but I got to admit it does interest me and I bet 12/21/2012 I will probably a lil cautious. 12/22/2012 is gunna be anakward day.
 
this is the same hting that was suppose dto happen in the yr 2000. But now with this bad economy hwo knows what will happen
 
Originally Posted by bruce negro

Originally Posted by The Yes Guy

Damn, 5 dimensions? What would the 5th one even be?

I thought 2012 was THE DAY THE QUARANTINE IS LIFTED OFF EARTH, or something like that. I can't remember where I heard that though....

the fifth dimension is basically the second dimension of the fourth dimension to put it simply. The fifth dimension is a branch of the fourth dimension at a point in the fourth dimension. Basically, think of where you are right now. Because there are infinite possible choices you can make, there are infinite branches from that point in the fourth dimension. Each of those branches a part of the fifth dimension. I think.
Pssssh....The 5th Dimension already exists

5thd.jpg
 
What a crappy special, i was looking forward to this, finally caught it today...i was greatly disappointed
 
Back
Top Bottom