block506
formerly dfranklin5
- Sep 2, 2012
- 1,756
- 920
so can someone tell me what color is the inside of the blk yeezy 2s? is it red or a dark pink?
Nike Air Yeezy Red October 2 Thread Officially Released VIA NDC 2/9. No BUYING/SELLING/TRADING.
- Thread in 'Nike' Thread starter Started by Spectacular23,
- Start date
- Jul 18, 2012
- 1,595
- 336
Solar Red; looks red in dark, but under the right light, it appears fluorescentish pink.
D
Deleted member 37467
Guest
Cat fight.
block506
formerly dfranklin5
- Sep 2, 2012
- 1,756
- 920
ahhhh okay........
- Jul 18, 2012
- 1,595
- 336
- Aug 4, 2013
- 760
- 2,791
I honestly reccomend using putty such as poster putty and putting a small amount into the lace tip and then screwing the lace in. It will grip and hold the lace tips and will be easy to remove if you ever choose to. Works for all my pairs.
Last edited:
- Sep 15, 2012
- 449
- 73
Don't quote me on this but a very small rumor is flying around that Nike is to reissue the Yeezy 1 set come this fall. Don't know how true this is but it possibly makes sense with the Yeezyesque Foamposite releasing.
jordunk23
Banned
- Jul 31, 2012
- 301
- 26
haha i doubt it...since ye still owns rights to the yeezy name if i'm right
- Sep 14, 2013
- 484
- 46
I think nike would own the name
- Feb 11, 2014
- 1,927
- 614
I don't think Kanye would have let Nike copyright Yeezy.
He either did it himself or maybe they've got half part each but there's no way Nike has got 100% of Yeezy.
He either did it himself or maybe they've got half part each but there's no way Nike has got 100% of Yeezy.
dj proto j
Banned
- Sep 25, 2009
- 7,244
- 1,593
it's been discussed b4, kanye does own the name "yeezy", not nike.
won't stop nike from releasing them as another name or something...
won't be anywhere near the same quality tho... and won't even look right without all the little yeezy related details.
i am sure they'll do it one day, but i don't think it'll be any time soon.
i firmly believe nike is trying to move on from anything kanye related, hence the way they released the RO's (which gave no extra promotion to kanye at all).
i feel quite lucky nike even released them at all... they've destroyed pairs b4, it would have meant nothing to them to do it with the RO's...
glad they dropped tho so they could be attained for at least semi-reasonable prices (versus the $6K + they were fetching b4 release, and even then you couldn't be 110% sure you got the real deal, when there was no officially released nike version to compare them to)...
had they not ever released they'd forever be that one shoe that you always wanted but couldn't have (paris dunks remain that for me, cuz i refuse to pay what they go for, even if i could find my size)...
won't stop nike from releasing them as another name or something...
won't be anywhere near the same quality tho... and won't even look right without all the little yeezy related details.
i am sure they'll do it one day, but i don't think it'll be any time soon.
i firmly believe nike is trying to move on from anything kanye related, hence the way they released the RO's (which gave no extra promotion to kanye at all).
i feel quite lucky nike even released them at all... they've destroyed pairs b4, it would have meant nothing to them to do it with the RO's...
glad they dropped tho so they could be attained for at least semi-reasonable prices (versus the $6K + they were fetching b4 release, and even then you couldn't be 110% sure you got the real deal, when there was no officially released nike version to compare them to)...
had they not ever released they'd forever be that one shoe that you always wanted but couldn't have (paris dunks remain that for me, cuz i refuse to pay what they go for, even if i could find my size)...
- Feb 11, 2014
- 1,927
- 614
But I reckon when Kanye made a contract with Nike, he must have insurred himself that the design (because he was very involved in designing the shoes) would not go to Nike without his approval.
He was the designer of the shoe, I'm not even sure Nike is allowed to use his design.
He was the designer of the shoe, I'm not even sure Nike is allowed to use his design.
- Jun 15, 2013
- 669
- 116
check the legit fake thread and you'll find my posts.
Last edited:
- May 3, 2009
- 657
- 53
- Jun 8, 2013
- 45
- 11
I personally wouldn't wear them but what do you guys think about the Super Perfects, Super Maxes or the AAA Supers or whatever TF they're called
It seems like people can't even tell the difference from looking at up-close pictures of the shoes so it would be impossible to tell on feet in person.
So $200 or whatever for fakes of the same quality > $3-4000 for authentics.
- Jun 8, 2013
- 45
- 11
Dead *** my friend got a pair I though they were legit for 2 weeks. Like I said I wouldn't buy them (Got screwed so many times on replica jerseys), but they look like unless you wear them around sneaker aficionados, they could pass as legit
Last edited:
- Oct 10, 2013
- 43,425
- 42,998
In for the LOL's
- Jun 8, 2013
- 45
- 11
If its what I asked, I dont find it funny. I just wanted other peoples opinions on Super Perfects
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,186
- 70,184
So it's kool to rock fakes if no one would notice?
- Oct 6, 2001
- 12,037
- 2,686
So anybody who sells their shoes for a $4000+ profit is a bum?
Your logic is beyond fantastic.
I would call that being a business man, I'm sure you're wearing those sole protectors so later on you can cash in after looking cool at the mall a few times.
I never wanted this shoe to keep...I've said that from day one.
Sounds like you're upset I cashed in locally for $4500.
Last edited:
- Oct 10, 2013
- 43,425
- 42,998
It's not but to be fair its also ridiculous that it IS COOL to drop 5k on a $200 shoeSo it's kool to rock fakes if no one would notice?
- Mar 29, 2001
- 22,186
- 70,184
It's ridiculous to drop $5k on a shoe if you broke forreal, but if you got it like that, then cook 
But it's ridiculous to knowingly rock fakes just because you think no one would notice.
It pays to play. If you can't afford it, move on to the next.
But it's ridiculous to knowingly rock fakes just because you think no one would notice.
It pays to play. If you can't afford it, move on to the next.
It's ridiculous to drop $5k on a shoe if you broke forreal, but if you got it like that, then cook
But it's ridiculous to knowingly rock fakes just because you think no one would notice.
It pays to play. If you can't afford it, move on to the next.
Why is it ridiculous if no one would notice, because the quality is just as good?
The main difference between fakes and the real deal of other non-Nike products is usually the quality, which is why it doesn't make sense to buy fakes.
Last edited:
- Jun 8, 2013
- 45
- 11
I am not the one rocking fakes. I wont do it. Im asking your guys' opinionsSo it's kool to rock fakes if no one would notice?
