- Feb 12, 2005
- 58,804
- 30,199
Didn't realize people were still seein the Orang Crush Defense being out there for the Broncos. Silly me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When Denver loses will you please commit that?
Did you know there's two sides to the game in football?
lmao! you mean seattles offense? yeah they aint scaring anybody
Didn't realize people were still seein the Orang Crush Defense being out there for the Broncos. Silly me.
When Denver loses will you please commit that?
with the weapons that peyton has, if you're not disguising coverage, he knows where he's going with the ball and it's gone right away. no chance. too many weapons to cover.
but I'm rooting for seattle. so good luck with that plan.
Answer the question.
When Denver loses will you please commit that?
yeah of course ill admitt if im wrong dawg, but like i said if seattle wins it wont be because of russell wilson and their offense it be because of their defense straight up
Yeah.
That's fine, but I'm referring to continual reasoning for people picking the Broncos being that they have too many weapons. I want more than that!!!
You want more for what? This ain't rocket science.
People are giving same reasons for picking Seattle. "Defense wins championships" "Their DB's, whatever whatever".
Other people, sure, but not me. I have mentioned some of those reasons, but also stated why and gave examples of other things.
Having more weapons isn't a good reason when the opposition is fully equipped to match up with each and every receiver. It's misinformation or simply not knowing enough about the other team.
Yeah.
That's fine, but I'm referring to continual reasoning for people picking the Broncos being that they have too many weapons. I want more than that!!!
You want more for what? This ain't rocket science.
People are giving same reasons for picking Seattle. "Defense wins championships" "Their DB's, whatever whatever".
Other people, sure, but not me. I have mentioned some of those reasons, but also stated why and gave examples of other things.
Having more weapons isn't a good reason when the opposition is fully equipped to match up with each and every receiver. It's misinformation or simply not knowing enough about the other team.
Seattle is not stopping all those receivers and Moreno. They match up well but I don't see it happening.
And Seattle's offense is being overlooked for a reason. Lynch does his thing but what else is their to talk about?
with the weapons that peyton has, if you're not disguising coverage, he knows where he's going with the ball and it's gone right away. no chance. too many weapons to cover.
but I'm rooting for seattle. so good luck with that plan.
strong post to avi/sig ratio.
with the weapons that peyton has, if you're not disguising coverage, he knows where he's going with the ball and it's gone right away. no chance. too many weapons to cover.
but I'm rooting for seattle. so good luck with that plan.
strong post to avi/sig ratio.
i can't wait to lose this damn avy and put my queen back up
Nobody will debate that. I won't. But they do their jobs very well and this is, after all, a team game.That receiving corps is MEDIOCRE.
srs.
When facing the Broncos defense, MEDIOCRE is the equivalent to great.That receiving corps is MEDIOCRE.
srs.
I don't think we give the new uniforms enough credit in terms of the reinvigoration of Seahawk football.
I give the nike magic like a solid 45%.
Super Bowl fun facts:
Fox and PC were both assistance coaches at ISU at one point.
1984 and 1978 respectively.
I'm curious how the crowd breaks down in terms of how many fans are there for each team.
I live in Seattle, so it's skewed, but I feel like everyone is going to this game. Two coworkers and numerous acquaintances. I'm sure it seems the same in Denver, but i'm just wondering how well this 12th man really does travel.