New Report - Aaron Hernandez Molested as a Child - p. 167

Remember now OJ got away with murder. If OJ can cause the glove didn't fit then Aaron can if they have no weapon
 
Remember now OJ got away with murder. If OJ can cause the glove didn't fit then Aaron can if they have no weapon

OJ didn't have two of his boys with him and Nicole texting her partner that she is getting in the car with OJ. OJ didn't kill her in the white bronco and then return it to the dealership. OJ didn't have cameras recording everything at the house.

Also AH ain't gonna have my Johnnie Cochran :lol. Dude was a beast in the courtroom, Puff should gave him to Shyne :{
 
No murder weapon, no eye witness.... No way he gets convicted on 1st degree murder. He's gonna get hit with something but not 1st degree murder.
 
No murder weapon, no eye witness.... No way he gets convicted on 1st degree murder. He's gonna get hit with something but not 1st degree murder.

hey now keep this kind of stuff in the george zimmerman thread.

hes done

that florida jury mentality got niketalkers thinking you can murder people and get away with it all the time now :lol

if thats NOT the murder weapon hes holding on the night of the murders then where did he put that gun that is on camera?

clearly you guys arent that gullible.

you really think all juries are that stupid?

ok hernandez if you are not the killer and that gun is NOT the gun on camera then where is that gun at? you were holding it the night of the murders at your house. did you accidentally drop the gun down the drain or a rat hole in your home?

he shoulda bought two of the same guns then again he isnt exactly the sharpest knife in the drawer as seen by the failed attempts of destroying the evidence
 
^ pretty much. You don't pick the day you kill someone to also destroy security cameras, destroy your cell phone, "lose" your guns, and then resist talking to police when they come to question you.......... I mean really? "I lost it" is not the answer you wanna give
 
^ still no hard evidence. You gotta walk in that court room with hard physical evidence! We talking 1st degree murder!
 
^ still no hard evidence. You gotta walk in that court room with hard physical evidence! We talking 1st degree murder!
 
I'm sure one of his boys will rat him out or vice versa when the time comes for time off or something
 
The point has been missed, if the murder weapon has not been found how can anyone say that's the murder weapon in a security cam screen shot.

show me anyone who can identify and differentiate 2 glock 27s ssitting next to each other in person let alone from security cam footage
I believe they found the shell casings used to kill Odin in Hernandez's rental car.  So they know what type of gun was used to kill Odin. They now have surveillance footage hours after the murder of Hernandez holding a gun. They will use the photo to explain that the gun he is holding matches the shell casings.  Thus, even though the murder weapon was not found, there is enough circumstantial evidence for a reasonable jury to find that he committed the murder.  
 
I believe they found the shell casings used to kill Odin in Hernandez's rental car.  So they know what type of gun was used to kill Odin. They now have surveillance footage hours minutes after the murder of Hernandez holding a gun. They will use the photo to explain that the gun he is holding matches the shell casings.  Thus, even though the murder weapon was not found, there is enough circumstantial evidence for a reasonable jury to find that he committed the murder.  
 
Still gotta match the bullet to a gun. I know I sound like a **** but this is simple **** the defense could easily manipulate a jury with.
 
Still gotta match the bullet to a gun. I know I sound like a **** but this is simple **** the defense could easily manipulate a jury with.
 
From my First 48 experience if they prove that you were at one point in possession of a similar gun to the one used in the murder, the prosecution will go forward w/ that and present that, even if the 'actual' weapon was never found.

In that case there was only 1 actual witness who saw the murder take place & they placed the gun in the murderer's hands
 
Last edited:
The point has been missed, if the murder weapon has not been found how can anyone say that's the murder weapon in a security cam screen shot.
They can't. Don't listen to these fools. And his boys talking ain't doing too much harm so far, seeing as how the stories they telling are shakier than their history. Big cases like this expose so many idiots
 
Last edited:
There's plenty of people that have been convicted of first degree murder without a body or a murder weapon and no one sang on them. I can dig up a few cases that it occurred near me. No way he walks. Everyone wants to be a legal expert now
 
There's plenty of people that have been convicted of first degree murder without a body or a murder weapon and no one sang on them. I can dig up a few cases that it occurred near me. No way he walks. Everyone wants to be a legal expert now

Correct . Any high profile case brings out the inner detective or lawyer on NT. Whether it be Steve McNair, Trayvon Martin, or Aaron Hernandez guys have no clue what's going on.
 
There's plenty of people that have been convicted of first degree murder without a body or a murder weapon and no one sang on them. I can dig up a few cases that it occurred near me. No way he walks. Everyone wants to be a legal expert now
True, but they didn't have the lawyers AH has.
 
There's plenty of people that have been convicted of first degree murder without a body or a murder weapon and no one sang on them. I can dig up a few cases that it occurred near me. No way he walks. Everyone wants to be a legal expert now

Show me!

No body, no weapon, and convicted?
 
Back
Top Bottom