- Jan 11, 2006
- 4,069
- 10
--Yeah I wasnt able to see the wall until someone PS'd the guy walking on it.
--Lulz at the Dodge pic comparison.
--Lulz at the Dodge pic comparison.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally Posted by Fog Raw
Time traveler looks shopped..
Originally Posted by Fog Raw
Time traveler looks shopped..
Originally Posted by Fog Raw
Time traveler looks shopped..
Given the source, we would assume the photo is authentic, and correctly dated to c.1940. Indeed, an Error Level Analysis suggests the image was not digitally tampered with, or at least that if it was, the author was smart enough to normalize the error across the whole thing. It’s a good job, if it was a job. And again, given the source, we would assume it was not a job.
So, how do we explain the man out of time?
Originally Posted by Fog Raw
Time traveler looks shopped..
Given the source, we would assume the photo is authentic, and correctly dated to c.1940. Indeed, an Error Level Analysis suggests the image was not digitally tampered with, or at least that if it was, the author was smart enough to normalize the error across the whole thing. It’s a good job, if it was a job. And again, given the source, we would assume it was not a job.
So, how do we explain the man out of time?
Originally Posted by StonedFace
Originally Posted by Fog Raw
Time traveler looks shopped..
from the same article
Given the source, we would assume the photo is authentic, and correctly dated to c.1940. Indeed, an Error Level Analysis suggests the image was not digitally tampered with, or at least that if it was, the author was smart enough to normalize the error across the whole thing. It’s a good job, if it was a job. And again, given the source, we would assume it was not a job.
So, how do we explain the man out of time?
Originally Posted by StonedFace
Originally Posted by Fog Raw
Time traveler looks shopped..
from the same article
Given the source, we would assume the photo is authentic, and correctly dated to c.1940. Indeed, an Error Level Analysis suggests the image was not digitally tampered with, or at least that if it was, the author was smart enough to normalize the error across the whole thing. It’s a good job, if it was a job. And again, given the source, we would assume it was not a job.
So, how do we explain the man out of time?
Originally Posted by LimeGreen95s
Originally Posted by ThuG LyFe
not "interesting" as some pics here i guess but still made me laugh
Originally Posted by LimeGreen95s
Originally Posted by ThuG LyFe
not "interesting" as some pics here i guess but still made me laugh
Originally Posted by LimeGreen95s
Originally Posted by ThuG LyFe
not "interesting" as some pics here i guess but still made me laugh
Originally Posted by LimeGreen95s
Originally Posted by ThuG LyFe
not "interesting" as some pics here i guess but still made me laugh
Originally Posted by cbfpunch
great thread!
hey can someone post up the original pic to the last frame in this strip? thanks!
Originally Posted by cbfpunch
great thread!
hey can someone post up the original pic to the last frame in this strip? thanks!