aight this is the final straw with people calling me ignorant on niketalk, i dropped out of grad with a 3.8 majoring philosophy and president of the philosophy club. i come on niketalk to wind down and relax, maybe catch up on some views and opinions of pop-culture, sometimes science political topics. i get pretty tired of you pseudo- humble intellectuals acting like you're on your way to win a pulitzer prize for being able to sit in front of a computer and google compelling arguments and back them up with the spell-check feature.
i misspell words and frankly don't care because i don't try to come of as condescending or like a "know it all", i actually type from my mobile device. so i don't have time to google quick reference answers in attempts to sound "smart" online in a sneaker forum. i can guarantee at the next summit or where EVER you want to meet if we sat down face to face (EVEN WEBCAM) you i'd probably tear you apart intellectually while you stutter and try to come up with the most persuasive argument you could for this subject matter.
i understand you're an "authority" figure here on this forum, but i'll be discrediting myself and the works of others by letting you damage the theory of women being the weaker species.
you called me bigot and for that you own me an apology. a big is intolerant of plausible evidence which may persuade his or her opinion or beliefs.
to add salt to the wound you throw a names and book titles into your rebuttal like you know what you're talking about. for one cordelia fine is a psychologist
and her basis of argument is "neuroscience". so this rules out her already wobbly claims of equality in the sexes.
human beings are a social species meaning we advance as a colony based on sentience, that's why evolve socially ...by 2014 10.5 million students from pre-k to 12 will
have taken a course online without never picking up a pencil. it's predicted that the qwerty keyboard will replace the pencil's functions in the classroom in years to come.
changing the demand for paper and evolving the eco system and the cutting of trees.
with that being said our roles are EVER advancing gender wise, this is where cordelian fine pitfalls into the abyss and becomes a slave to a misogynistic themed thread
filled with PRE-PROGRAMMED guys responding from a "female" point of view which is nicely gift wrapped in their male agenda which is to reproduce by problem solving
in their habitat which happens to be the work place where they are placed in a submissive position under a dominate MALE. GENETICALLY giving him what "he" wants
in order to survive .
which if you would've took your head out of your ... never-mind, lets just say if you we're really inclined to female equality as a male you've would've CAUGHT my first
response jokingly saying "i felt sorry for females that they have to deal with men that replied in this thread in real life".
truth is you're just a domineering entity on a forum looking to have his ego stroked by his faithful followers by making an example out of what your lazy mind perceived as
a "easy target" to demonstrate your mental capacity and control over this board.
going back to evolution, FEMALES are biologically built to impregnate and carry male's offspring. there's "hunters" and "gatherers".
there's a number of PHYSICAL reasons males were made and classified as the "hunters".
1. our bones are more dense and stronger than females, estrogen SOFTEN the bones to contour to the body during pregnancy.
2. females are more likely to sustain injuries than males because of the placement of our knees, elbows and alcs are made for
grappling, running, climbing etc
. (unlike cordelia fine MY ARGUEMENTS are backed by CREDIBLE doctors like Yi-Ming Yen, M.D., Ph.D
of university of Los Angeles.)
3. MENOPAUSE (where females literally lose the ability to get pregnant) triggers depression which is a MENTAL ILLNESS where decision making skills may be halted or damaged in crisis
i.e president, superior officer in war time, positions that have to make calculative decisions that place countless lives in the balance.
4. males proficiently use the LEFT side of the brain, which is powered by dopamine, which helps up with planning, navigation, cognitive functions, and impulse control.
females use the left by rely heavily on the RIGHT which is powered by norepinephrine, and opiate which is for "receptive" functions like grooming, feeding etc.
now there's also SOCIAL REASONS.
like i stated before i women's rights was tried, fought and championed for women everywhere that's cool. i admire a woman that wants to be equal to a man.
1. women have certain "receptive" needs emotionally based off of the scientific information i've provided before. SHE CAN NOT deny the chemical impulses and urges
that precursor her reason for being. therefore she will submit to a dominate male if her hormones in her body are telling her to. if she fights it then her decision
may effect those around her or who's she's responsible for. she will gamble with the welfare of a nation, company, or squadron based on a premeditated response
of refusal to ensure her place of authority.
2. BIOLOGICALLY women need to feel attractive, this is why they "flirt". Flirting gives her a sense of security and empowerment that she can find a suitor
to impregnate her. If she's in the work place, she will unknowingly flirt with a male to feel "safe". regardless of the social construct of workplace etiquette, sexual harassment
laws, marriage, wealth we're HUMANS, mammals and a primal being lays beneath the surface. WE WILL RESPOND SEXUALLY. sometime women respond inaccurately
to the sexual harassment laws indoctrinated to PROTECT her. she may be taken advantage of and realize it AFTER the fact, omitting the fact that she may intentionally or unintentionally
initiated the flirting and unappropriated social cue that invites sexual behavior.
there's more catalyst than this, and while you're sprouting off names that "sound good". try this one professor chaffee, my old teacher and read his book "thinking critically".
it teaches you to question the status quo, REGARDLESS of if you "appear" to be right or wrong. carefully analyzing FACTS to put together a COHESIVE argument with FACTS.
i sincerely hope since you're man enough to beat me down in a thread FULL OF misogyny and mall superiority and mis-quote cordelia fine...you're man enough to apologize for calling
me a BIGOT. you made a generalized statement based of your own inadequate and antiquated problem solving, it's almost 2012 b.
here's a few munchies for you to eat in your spare time b:
http://www.dailymail.co. uk/health/article-562627/Are-women-really-weaker-sex-The-intriguing-medical-facts-settle-oldest-argument-all.html
http://www. mastersofhealthcare.com/blog/2009/10-big-differences-between-mens-and-womens-brains/
http://nyunews.com/opinion/2010/11/29/30paumen/
http://www.psychologytoda...evolutionary-psychiatry/
FATALITY!