- 42,577
- 178,052
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2013
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
You forgot the most obvious answer at #1In order of why we lost, in my opinion:
1. Nuggets. They're better. Simple.
2. Laker turnovers (goes back to #1).
3. Clumsy Laker offense (again: see #1).
4. Rui & AR providing NOTHING.
5. All Lakers not named Bron playing hesitant/scared down the stretch.
6. Pelinka.
I don't know if this is a good sign or bad sign but I can't really blame him.
Because of those 2?
Or because of horrible roster construction?
(Because of horrible roster construction.)
Pelinka & Co. don't address needs; they just sign names. We could have Kiwi & PG as our franchise guys, and we'd be just as frustrated if we signed every guard in the league and 'Wait, who?' bigs who are injured a lot.
Impacts? Yes. Handcuffs? No.You don't feel that 95 million kind of impacts how you can build the rest of your roster?
Especially when I show you that Jokic/Murray are both younger AND cheaper??????
Something in the Lakers direct control?You forgot the most obvious answer at #1
Oh yes, something that's in direct control of the Lakers.Something in the Lakers direct control?
The only thing I listed that is not in the Lakers direct control is #1, and that's why it's #1.
Impacts? Yes. Handcuffs? No.
He gutted a championship team and has been scrambling to make up for it ever since.
I don't know if this is a good sign or bad sign but I can't really blame him.
I don't remember them pushing "Yay! We won! Now get rid of everyone except us, please & thanks."You remember who pushed for that gutting?
The two guys that "need more help" right now.
I don't remember then pushing "Yay! We won! Now get rid of everyone except us, please & thanks."