- Mar 5, 2008
- 12,280
- 12,076
Never had Chicagos so I'm going for these.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Exactly! I’m gonna grab every Chicago that drops, unless it’s patent leather, or some other awfully constructed and looking version, and keep it pushing.I agree. People with the 2015’s really don’t need these. I’m a sucker for Chicago’s so I’ll just keep copping…unless they drop another sucky 2013 version.
Y’all the reason JB keeps beating around the bush with making an actual great retro of these.Exactly! I’m gonna grab every Chicago that drops, unless it’s patent leather, or some other awfully constructed and looking version, and keep it pushing.
Dude, I’ve been doing this an extremely long time. Jordan Brand is going to do what they are going to do regardless.Y’all the reason JB keeps beating around the bush with making an actual great retro of these.
If people will just buy any marketed Chicago 1, despite terrible aging jobs like they did here, why WOULD they ever properly re do this jawn?
I love the Chicago 1 period. So like I stated, as long as it's not patent leather (which is ALWAYS awful on 1s that aren't some combo of black/gold/white IMO), or an some awfully constructed and/or looking version, I'm in. These aren't awful IMO. As for them beating around the bush with making an actual great retro of these, intimating that we've been getting a bunch of bad retros of these specifically, the last retro we've even gotten of these were the 2015s, and those are great IMO.Y’all the reason JB keeps beating around the bush with making an actual great retro of these.
If people will just buy any marketed Chicago 1, despite terrible aging jobs like they did here, why WOULD they ever properly re do this jawn?
Lmaoo 100 %Y’all the reason JB keeps beating around the bush with making an actual great retro of these.
If people will just buy any marketed Chicago 1, despite terrible aging jobs like they did here, why WOULD they ever properly re do this jawn?
Now they need to undo the og lows tiny *** swoosh
Okay.. so reimagined = 94 toe box, 03 mid, 85ish swoosh, 22 neo vintage. Got it..
No on the 94 toebox. The 85 Retro has that. If what we're seeing is legit, these look to be somewhere between the 94/85 and remastered pairs.
Y’all the reason JB keeps beating around the bush with making an actual great retro of these.
If people will just buy any marketed Chicago 1, despite terrible aging jobs like they did here, why WOULD they ever properly re do this jawn?
Sure.
Papi I ain’t bought a pair of Jordans since the Bred 11’s. If these were accurate down to the leather grain, you’d see me as a “maybe” because I consider the Jordan 1 like the Black Dahlia.Cool, hope I dont see you in October talking about W’s or L’s.
Wait for the real retro then.
LOL OK. Here's my 94 pair. Looks way more like the 85 retros to me, but what do I know. ..
These Chicago's got EVERYONE feeling confrontational. I expect a 30 man NT royal rumble by the time release month gets here.My whole post was a joke .. this thread is diff and it’s only June
I was just saying yesterday this thread a war zone nowThese Chicago's got EVERYONE feeling confrontational. I expect a 30 man NT royal rumble by the time release month gets here.
I expect a 30 man NT royal rumble by the time release month gets here.
The 15s won’t last forever and they get a lot of wear.Exactly! I’m gonna grab every Chicago that drops, unless it’s patent leather, or some other awfully constructed and looking version, and keep it pushing.