- Aug 2, 2006
- 34,221
- 29,550
i think im drawing pretty obvious inferences from the tweet.-If someone did this level on mind-reading on you, or someone you were defending, you would have a massive issue. There are two tweets also. A question and response. You are somehow combining the two here in a storage way.
I don't think im mind reading.
cancel culture is almost always leveled at progressives
so when skeptically questions the existence of cancel culture
and the response is "the most prominent conservative cancellation"
it's reasonable inference to draw without having access to questlove.
when i used the term mind reading
im referring to is people creating imaginary internal motivations to impune the credibility of the person they are arguing with.
obviously we are communicating via the internet, you're going to have to draw some inferences.
I was attempting to use it as a jumping off point to address an argument I see used often.-Wavy is ranting about Joe Rogan, for a specific reason, for specific actions
-I do rant about Joe Manchin for specific things
-You just went off because you felt a tweet was attacking your position and claimed a whole bunch of stuff that doesn't even appear in the tweet
So I just rant way. But I feel there is a difference as to what motivates some of your rants vs other people's
"cancel culture isn't real"
"noone ever really been cancelled"
i feel like I see this point brought up every time this argument comes up.
so I was using this tweet to address that general line of argument.