Some people just live and die by false equivalencies
Some of you dudes will tie yourself in knots and ignore what is right in front of you, just to peddle a "both sides" argument.
Knew you were on your way, before I hit "POST REPLY"
I’ll need you to inform yourself my dude. Not saying this to be disrespectful either. What you just said is simply untrue
It was true up to a point. WHile another sticking point was money for states. Shes on record of saying she can deal with that in the next administration. They doubled back and that became an issue again now. As well as a national plan on testing and tracing. And TIN holders getting stimulus. I'm pretty informed. People up there playing politics instead of working in the best interest of the people. Thankfully Im not in need, but i know many people who are. They could have been reached a deal. Or even just ran back the Cares act provisions roughly ( like they ran back the gov budget to avoid a shutdown). But GOPS are cheap ****s and Nancy wants a perfect bill. **** them all.
You are saying Nancy's big plot is to make Da Donald look bad. Know what could have easily erased that? Accepting the two previous bills that were passed, you know since he wanted a stimulus package even "bigger" allegedly
Bro, nobody on earth is bending over backwards to make Trump look bad. He does that himself on an hourly basis. Throwing bad faith bills over and refusing to compromise is what the republican majority is doing. The US has billions for a wall that fell over, billions for military weapons to fight nobody, billions to bail out big business, but NOTHING for the American people who provide those billions.
Don't worry, I won't
Truth to what you said. Again, bad faith bills gets nobody anything. 600 a week wasn’t enough but now 400< will be? You accept that and people are screwed worse than they already are.
Skinny bill was a joke attempt to say they tried. GOP only care about stock holders.
The point I was making. Those representing the US are failing.
I should and I do change. Just a sign a healthy growth and developement.Don't worry, I won't
But you should
You are basically erasing the Senate from the conversation to make your argument work.
Secondly, we forgetting that Trump walked away from the table months ago on the advice of Mitch McConnell.
And you're whole "best interest of the people" makes little sense, when what would be in the best interest of the people would be passing the Dems' 3 trillion bill.
But uhhhhh "both sides"
Huh?
Look how Nancy Pelosi is trying to make Trump look bad by making him do this dumb ****.This spray tan POS
Read the Heroes act for yourself, and you will be able to spot the stuff completely unrelated. Its pretty easy.Your argument makes little sense.
First, please tell me what lobbyist **** bloated up the bill. Because it first off it is hilarious you make it seem like the GOP is generally cheap when they happily passed a corporate tax cut, and increased military spending which blew up the deficit before Covid hit. The GOP spends as much as the Dems, just on different ****. Different **** their lobbyists want.
But here, enlighten me...
https://www.vox.com/2020/5/12/21254397/next-coronavirus-stimulus-package-democrats-heroes-act
Because economists all over the ideological spectrum, even people like Greenspan and Powell, were saying Congress should go big with the fiscal help. So again, point out to me where the unnecessary lobbyist **** is that was holding this up. With Trump, the major sticking point for the longest seems to be state aid, which is hardly lobbyist ****.
You said they don't care about regular people. When they passed the best bill for regular people out of the bunch.
Secondly, now you throw in the Senate's bill but erase Trump.
The House passed a 3 trillion dollar bill, Trump wanted something around 1.2. Pelosi took a trillion off of her number and came down to around 2.2. So Nancy already compromised to close the gap. The Senate was never unified like the Dems, Mitch told Trump not to compromise with Pelosi. On his advice, Trump walked away from the table a while back.
If Trump wanted to look good, all he had to do is agree to the bill that would stimulate the economy most and provide the most help. That would be the Dems bill. Either one. Instead, he made up with a bull**** complaint about a "liberal state bailout".
That the elephant in the room you keep ignoring. THE SENATE WOULD PROBABLY NOT HAVE PASSED THE COMPROMISE BILL. Even if Pelosi agreed to Trump's number. McConnell was making it clear he wasn't with it. While Trump is outchea saying he will do 1.8-1.9 trillion, the Senate Republicans are passing 500 billion dollar bills.
So yes, you are pushing a bad false equivalency because you refuse to acknowledge that the GOP had two elements both acting in bad faith at times and with one undercutting the other. The deal was not done not because Pelosi prioritized hurting Trump (which is laughable given how much he has hurt his own electoral chances), it is because the GOP couldn't get their **** together.
Lo rolling over in his grave because of this false equivalency
How is this even remotely believable? North and South Dakota is now a hotbed. Serves them right honestlyThis spray tan POS
If it is pretty easy, then the person that made the claim should be able to point them out.
Your conclusion isn’t fitting what you’re saying you understand. There is ONE side in charge. There is ONE side with control. There is ONE side with majority.
If Nancy said yes, we'd have a deal. If Donald said yes, we'd have a deal. They didnt. So we dont. So **** them. **** Mitch McConnell, only care about the supreme court. And **** that piece of garbage Larry Kudlow talkin bout, we dont need a stimulus. V shaped recovery. No *****. Its a k. Rich get richer and the poor die quicker.
