- Jan 2, 2010
- 83,304
- 119,452
The Terry Crews thing is wild. 
They be testing these brothas.
They be testing these brothas.
Harvey Weinstein = Hollywood dumpster fire.
- Mar 19, 2013
- 47,261
- 96,842
Battymon run the world
- Feb 5, 2013
- 39,627
- 41,441
not just make it but stay in hollywood...
reference a tweet by Victoria Brownsworth..." "the weinstein company didnt fire him because he was praying on women, he get fired because it became public knowledge"
- Dec 19, 2013
- 17,359
- 24,447
This was almost 20 years ago. This been known for decades yet now it comes out. Industry just saving face because Harvey finally got caught.
- Sep 5, 2013
- 3,456
- 2,973
this was well known for decades, there were little hints since late 90's,
also ben affleck is out here doing the jerry jones kneeling then getting exposed for being trash like his brother, you ever wondered why alot of those actresses vanished?
theres a reason why people dont speak out, that story about terry crews got me heated, but in the end these guys have never been told no and they never got their *** beat.
theres wayy too many dudes in music and movies that still operate like this, and in some way tech world is going the same route.
fake feminists and liberals are the worst of the bunch next to fake conservatives that beg their mistresses to get abortions or are super anti gay and order young men to their hotels.
also ben affleck is out here doing the jerry jones kneeling then getting exposed for being trash like his brother, you ever wondered why alot of those actresses vanished?
theres a reason why people dont speak out, that story about terry crews got me heated, but in the end these guys have never been told no and they never got their *** beat.
theres wayy too many dudes in music and movies that still operate like this, and in some way tech world is going the same route.
fake feminists and liberals are the worst of the bunch next to fake conservatives that beg their mistresses to get abortions or are super anti gay and order young men to their hotels.
- Mar 16, 2010
- 149,251
- 184,123
This was almost 20 years ago. This been known for decades yet now it comes out. Industry just saving face because Harvey finally got caught.
Yea it definitely seems like it was an open secret in the industry but nothing happened...
Goddamn at the 30 rock scene
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,893
- 50,405
That's another thing.
All these ****** up assistants facilitating sexual abuse.
All these ****** up assistants facilitating sexual abuse.
- Dec 19, 2013
- 17,359
- 24,447
Yup. Modern day mafia.
Wanna speak out? Well good luck finding another role in film while fighting a lawsuit against these heavy hitters.
Harvey is Fredo. Dude messin it up for all of em
Wanna speak out? Well good luck finding another role in film while fighting a lawsuit against these heavy hitters.
Harvey is Fredo. Dude messin it up for all of em
- Mar 12, 2011
- 7,833
- 8,466
Ben Affleck starting to get exposed now.
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
something u might wanna look at....
THE BLOGS
Why the NY Times is suddenly taking down Harvey Weinstein
October 7, 2017, 11:34 pm 7
J.J GROSS
The hypocrisy of the liberal left when it comes to sexual harassment is embedded and endemic. No sooner does a Conservative or Republican so much as utter an offensive comment and the media and entertainment industries are all over him like bottle flies on excrement.
There is no better example than that of Donald Trump who is neither a paragon of virtue nor the most astute POTUS in US history. Yet compared with the behavior of say, a JFK who ran the White House as his own private bordello, or his pathetic younger brother who likely murdered one of his doxies in a moment of drunken premeditated fear, or Bill Clinton who is the poster boy for vile behavior and consummately poor taste, Trump is a virtual eagle scout.
Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, we are now informed by the New York Times, is a serial abuser of starlets, and has to his credit at least eight hush-money payoffs to young ladies of questionable virtue and buyer’s remorse. Apparently, the Times tells us, this is not exactly a Pulitzer prize-worthy scoop. In Hollywood circles Mr. Weinstein’s erotic proclivities are hardly news, and date back as much as two decades if not longer. His modus operandi, it seems, is to invite ingénues up to his hotel room where he would await them naked and ask for favors in exchange for advancing their careers or, conversely, not quashing them.
One can, of course, ask what young lady with half a brain would go up to a mogul’s hotel room unchaperoned and expect to find anything other than a dirty old man bartering stardom for sexual favors. What exactly where these girls thinking? And who forced them to comply, or even remain in Weinstein’s room? Surely he did not hold them at gunpoint.
Nevertheless such questions do not explain the omerta that prevailed for over twenty years whereby Harvey Weinstein was never once called on the carpet, red or otherwise, for his loathsome conduct. Rather, the invisible shield that protected him was his well-funded adherence to liberal dogma and his largesse to the machinery of political correctness which is de rigueur in Hollywood, the MSM and academia. One does not touch the sacred cows who prime the liberal pimp, excuse me, pump.
Donald Trump utters the word ‘*****’ and a million hollering dames march on Washington clad in vaginal millinery, while Hollywood leading ladies scream like banshees, most notably Ashley Judd. Yet Ms. Judd was one of the very ‘victims’ allegedly assaulted by Harvey Weinstein years and years ago, yet she chose then to keep her hysterical mouth shut in order to advance her own Hollywood career.
So the question – and it’s a big one – is why did the Gray Lady, that pinnacle of journalistic probity called the New York Times, suddenly find it necessary to violate the conspiracy of silence and share this information on page one only now?
Can it be because barely a month ago, Weinstein announced his plan to direct a movie based on Leon Uris’s epic Warsaw Ghetto novel ‘Mila 18’? Can it be because Weinstein, despite his bleeding heart liberalism, despite his having shoveled truckloads of dollars into the Obama coffers, despite his blind obeisance to the Clinton corruption machine, crossed the Israel-hating Time’s red line and declared himself a Zionist and a lover of Israel? Had Weinstein instead come out in support of BDS is there a chance of a snowball in hell that the Times would have taken the liberty of bringing down such a lion of liberalism?
Make no mistake, the Times’ decision to destroy Harvey Weinstein is not a harbinger of greater fairness and objectivity. Do not for a moment think that this is some opening salvo in leveling the playing field and declaring what is bad for the conservative goose is equally bad for the liberal gander. No. This is merely the New York Times issuing a powerful warning to anyone of prominence in its tightly controlled liberal corral to be very careful. Because the slightest manifestation of pro-Israel sentiment will result in the unleashing of its bloodhounds. And the editors of the Times will not rest until they have the goods needed to destroy the Zionist culprit no matter how much money he may have given Obama and Clinton.
Caveat temptor.
http://blogs.timesofisrael.com/why-the-ny-times-is-suddenly-taking-down-harvey-weinstein/
- Dec 25, 2003
- 43,259
- 28,578
Whole thing is wild and disgusting. Openly joking about it is crazy. I know a lot of people didntbfind that funny.
- Aug 1, 2004
- 70,048
- 24,223
glorified Hollywood groupies, of course they giving up da *** for access.
those meta jokes on Harvey Weinstein is straight up Stockholm syndrome at its finest
on balance most of those broads who ended up blowing up and having millions of dollars by sleeping with Harvey look at their lives of prestige and power as "ehh cost of doing business".
Goddamn at the 30 rock scene
Reminds me of the subtle Cosby joke they had on there before he was put on blast
Another one of those open secrets
- Dec 19, 2013
- 17,359
- 24,447
Hannibal Burress was a writer for 30 Rock. That was probably his Aunt they were talking about
- Jul 14, 2004
- 31,322
- 21,269
More stories bout this dude creepin coming out. I wonder if the folks who willingly did casting couches to get a role will come out too
I’m wondering who this is. Also wondering which well known actresses have caved in and slept with this creep
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,893
- 50,405
Word
- Nov 17, 2013
- 16,543
- 7,757
Correct, Harvey makes these actresses wear his wife's stuff.
What's his wife supposed to do? Stay with him? She's ditching him to save face.
- Nov 20, 2007
- 87,893
- 50,405
That's weird.
- May 11, 2017
- 17,433
- 26,986
More stories bout this dude creepin coming out. I wonder if the folks who willingly did casting couches to get a role will come out too
wow this dude wasnt giving any damns
im ready to hear the Lyor/Iovine stories tho...those will be more interesting...lets keep this exposal trend going
LA Reid already in Switzlerland bunkered down
Jimmy Two Times
Banned
- Aug 2, 2017
- 592
- 418
Getting an acting job is hard enough but imagine how cut throat it must be for these younger women in LA trying to score a gig. Deadly.
- Jul 21, 2012
- 11,959
- 6,203
Dan with a van should be next 
- May 11, 2017
- 17,433
- 26,986
This was almost 20 years ago. This been known for decades yet now it comes out. Industry just saving face because Harvey finally got caught.
Yea it definitely seems like it was an open secret in the industry but nothing happened...
Goddamn at the 30 rock scene
Like I said in here and the Nelly thread Hollywood doesn't care about exposing people they care about keeping people in check until they piss them off or evidence becomes to overwhelming to keep an inside thing.
- Jul 14, 2004
- 31,322
- 21,269
What’re some articles or stories about Dan with a van and who specifically?
- Jan 12, 2013
- 26,990
- 38,693
Looks like that NY DA Vance got a "donation" from a Weinstein lawyer and coincidentally he didn't end up prosecuting despite the man literally being on tape.
Disgusting
Disgusting
- Nov 17, 2013
- 16,543
- 7,757
To be fair, general consensus is that her dresses are pretty good.
But she wouldn't have had that exposure if these A-list actresses didn't wear it (publicity).
