squatchnt
The listing in that eBay listing I was talking about was a legit size 16. The reason for the question was to determine if the shoe in the listing "could have been GM". If 16's don't come in GM(and they don't) then that shoe HAD HAD HAD to be legit and could be used as a comparison to authenticate my size 12.
I had just purchased a size 12 for myself and was having a hard time authenticating it, and it had the same "GM" tells that the size 16 that was legit had, therefore meaning mine was quite possibly legit in spite of the many posts here claiming otherwise.
Crazy thing to me was how hard it was to authenticate my size 12 on NT, not only in this thread, but in a legit check thread I did. With so so so many people claiming to be experts, not many were willing to put their name and knowledge on the line to call mine either or.
In the LC thread probably 90% of the initial posters said they leaned toward them being GM. (However, on e I stepped up and claimed them as authentic and showed proof of why, many more came forward and cosigned the shoe being authentic.
But, when I was first told they were GM, Based on that information I dug deeper with the seller (almost accusing them of selling me reps based on misinformation from here). Not only did I have to end up apologizing to the seller for accusing them of malpractice but it was quite the embarrassment to come at someone and insinuate they were less than honest based on information I was given.
Long story short, after about a week of comparing mine to others from size 8-17 I came to find out that all the tells of being GM that my Sz 12 Tuxedo had, all the sizes from 8-17 also had.
It became clear to me that their were several factors on ALL TUXEDOS that hit the retail market that today would be considered GM traits.
I tell you this though, one thing I can do now is AUTHENTICATE a Tuxedo low.
****edit: Now the listing you posted, that joint was HILARIOUSLY bad. Damn dude