- 11,182
- 17,262
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That analogy does not make sense, like statistical sense.
This is like poetryIt's always amusing seeing people who have 0 knowledge of poker discuss poker.
Sexism,
Her gender and single digit IQ is helping her here, if this were another male professional player, it would be labeled cheating by every professional player on the planet.
She calls off 110K in a spot where she claims she thought she has 10% equity but manages to have 47% equity.
This is really the only bluff in his range that she's doing ok against, that's why people who understand poker think there's something up.
There was a MAJOR cheating scandal just a few years ago on a live poker stream, the outrage is warranted.
This is like poetry
Takes issue with someone mentioning sexism, then post this
Famb, you not only used this situation to insult her general intelligence, but you also said she is getting preferential treatment because she is a woman.Yea, me calling her dumb isn't sexist, it's calling a spade a spade.
If you don't understand poker, just say that.
Famb, you not only used this situation to insult her general intelligence, but you also said she is getting preferential treatment because she is a woman.
If you don't want people to think you are sexist, and the anger to ward her doesn't involve sexism, you are doing a terrible job
I understand enough about poker, and given the evidence available, to think people like you are overreacting about this situation and probably a bit sexistAgain, if you don't understand poker just say that.
If you understood the game, you'd also be calling her a clown.
Her explaining this hand is like ninjahood trying to explain why he isn't black.
There's plenty of brilliant women in poker, she's not one of them.
I understand enough about poker, and given the evidence available, to think people like you are overreacting about this situation and probably a bit sexist
And every time you post, I fall deeper into that position
I don't see the compelling evidence or explanation that is so concrete that it makes "she took a massive risk and got very lucky".
I understand enough about poker, and given the evidence available, to think people like you are overreacting about this situation and probably a bit sexist
And every time you post, I fall deeper into that position
But this play is one of the worst of all time. Tell me the last WSOP or any live streamed high stakes event you’ve watched that had a more ridiculous play?
You claimed poker was gambling, your level of understanding is literally @ 0.
A lot of top players on the planet suspect cheating in the hand, there's a reason for that and it's not because she's a woman.
But hey, I'm sure that a bunch of NT'ers who have dissertation battles on Bernie Sanders and M&N shorts know better than people who make millions playing poker.
NRS 463.0152 “Game” and “gambling game” defined.
1. “Game” or “gambling game” means any game played with cards, dice, equipment or any mechanical or electronic device or machine for money, property, checks, credit or any representative of value, including, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, faro, monte, roulette, keno, bingo, fan-tan, twenty-one, blackjack, seven-and-a-half, klondike, craps, poker, chuck-a-luck, wheel of fortune, chemin de fer, baccarat, pai gow, beat the banker, panguingui, slot machine, any banking or percentage game or any other game or device approved by the Commission, upon the recommendation of the Board, pursuant to NRS 463.164.
2. The term does not include games:
(a) Played with cards in private homes or residences in which no person makes money for operating the game, except as a player; or
(b) Operated by qualified organizations that are registered by the Chair pursuant to the provisions of chapter 462 of NRS.
(Added to NRS by 1967, 1039; A 1969, 462; 1979, 772; 1981, 1073; 1985, 2134; 2019, 964; 2021, 3377)
I must say it is weird y'all poker dudes use so many bad probabilities analogiesShe didn't get lucky, this is exactly the point.
Like I keep saying, if you don't understand poker, just say that.
This is a coin flip situation, that you're literally never calling unless you know his exact holding.
This is why people think that something is up.
You're not making this play unless you know your opponent has exactly 87 here.
There's already been a cheating scandal involving live streams when someone hacked the feed and had access to everyone's holdings.
I must say it is weird y'all poker dudes use so many bad probabilities analogies
That's not an analogy, the situation was literally a coin flip.
53/47 equity = coin flip in poker, pretty basic stuff.
You keep trying to school me on poker, tho.
Genuinely curious, what is this 53/47 coin flip notion in poker? A regular coin flip (not poker, nothing, just plain old take a coin out the pocket) its 50/50 and all based on luck.
A true 50/50 in poker is pretty rare, so generally anything within 5% just gets called a flip.
Famb I understand what she did. I think I knew enough about poker than research while people are mad to understand the situationThere can obviously be folks out there who are sexist and their opinion can reflect that. But this play is one of the worst of all time. Tell me the last WSOP or any live streamed high stakes event you’ve watched that had a more ridiculous play?
Did you watch the hand rusty? Did you understand what she did? I’m thinking you’re not understanding what happened, if you can’t see why people are reacting with outrage.
Explain this to me like im an idiot, cause I still have no idea what youre talking about.
For ppl who play it professionally poker isn't a game where actually gambling is looked well upon. Cuz its not really just gambling with skilled players.I read and watched videos trying to understand the outrage over what happened in the poker vid.
And the outrage comes off as kinda silly as hell to me.
Even if people didn't like her "gambling" (which just sounds silly to me because they are literally gambling) some dudes so worked up about it, I start to suspect some sexism is fueling some of the anger.
Unless people can prove she cheated, so what if she got lucky?
Trying to make it about the winner of that pot gender is missing the point and its pretty lazy.
If it was a dude who did that the reactions would have most likely been worse. So suggesting its cuz she is a woman is even more false.
If professional poker players want to take issue because it breaks the norms of their profession they can go ahead.For ppl who play it professionally poker isn't a game where actually gambling is looked well upon. Cuz its not really just gambling with skilled players.
Especially for those who take it seriously and lean more to the mathematical statistics side of them game.
Its not hard to get why that whole sequence is not looked at favorably as far as professionals go
Trying to make it about the winner of that pot gender is missing the point and its pretty lazy.
If it was a dude who did that the reactions would have most likely been worse. So suggesting its cuz she is a woman is even more false.
Also had that been done to one of the more popular players like Daniel Negreanu or Phil Hellmuth and its would've been a wild ridiculous reaction that would've lasted the rest of the night