- 10,478
- 9,125
- Joined
- Dec 19, 2013
She gave back the money.
Not saying it’s an admission of guilt but
Not saying it’s an admission of guilt but
Fools Wildin Thinking They Doing It Unappreciation Vol Get The @#*+ out
aepps20
Supporter
- 42,263
- 89,884
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2004
- 42,456
- 177,734
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2013
- 42,456
- 177,734
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2013
- 42,456
- 177,734
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2013
- 9,358
- 20,028
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2021
- 12,378
- 34,587
- Joined
- Aug 31, 2012
My question is how did they expect to get away with that? You’d figure the judges and everyone else involved in the tournament would be able to ballpark how much a fish weighs based off of its size.
- 26,499
- 29,711
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2011
Probably did it a few times and just got much more egregious with it. In the fu vid they mentioned that people have been suspecting foul play since previous tournaments which indicates that they've been winning several tournaments. This is when they've called them on it. When a thief gets away with things for a while, they start to get sloppy.
- 9,358
- 20,028
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2021
The wildest thing to me was learning that polygraph tests are a pretty standard thing at these fishing tournaments
Beruseruku Desu
Supporter
- 12,428
- 26,104
- Joined
- Oct 10, 2018
- 11,009
- 16,903
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2010
Zero damage done…
computersputin
formerly arrowcollarman
- 3,913
- 4,070
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2014
- 41,422
- 62,745
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2014
Why do they all look like Andy’s Cornell a Capella group from The Office
- 87,843
- 50,342
- Joined
- Nov 20, 2007
Wonder what made them curious enough to cut open the fish and check.
Especially if he's been winning this way for years.
@ stuffing other parts of fish in to a smaller fish
- 25,909
- 22,871
- Joined
- Jun 15, 2013
Bunch of thugs!
- 33,880
- 39,733
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2012
Wonder what made them curious enough to cut open the fish and check.
Especially if he's been winning this way for years.
Probably something real fishy was going on.
- 42,456
- 177,734
- Joined
- Oct 28, 2013
- 69,422
- 105,833
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
Who cares, she beat his ***, no cheating from what y'all explained. I'm not seeing the issue unless I'm missing the unwritten rules in poker of "dumb broad must not beat man, must explain self". If anything if this was an amateurish move you look stupid for getting caught by it.
calibeebee
Supporter
- 19,564
- 25,420
- Joined
- May 6, 2007
No unwritten rule, she just made an insanely idiotic move STATISTICALLY. If she herself put him on ace high, then she knows EXACTLY the odds of winning in that situation. She knows how many cards are available to beat that hand, with what she herself has. Not too complicated. But she made the call anyway.
Look at it like this: she’s playing Russian roulette for her life. A 6-shooter revolver can carry 6 bullets in the cartridge. She watches a person, with her eyes, put 6 bullets in the cartridge and spin it, and ask her if she wants to pull the trigger. She thinks about it and thinks about it. She knows every bullet is in the chamber. She could just pass and not die for sure. Or she could pull the trigger knowing there’s 100% chance she’ll die. SHE DECIDES TO PULL THE TRIGGER AND SHOOT HERSELF.
“Why did you pull the trigger, you thought there were 5 bullets? Wait, you thought there were SIX BULLETS AND YOU STILL PULLED THE TRIGGER?!”
I think is the general gist of the situation……
- 38,642
- 54,274
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2014
I'm not a poker player but I don't think that analogy is a very good one
- 69,422
- 105,833
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2010
Yeah you kinda made her sound like Maverick
- 7,954
- 5,065
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2007
I really don’t get what’s so hard to understand about that poker vid.
If you play it or at least understand it you know why her winning that hand had nothing to do with skill and was a pure gamble.
It has nothing to do with their gender.
The whole thing definitely belongs in here for several reasons.
If you play it or at least understand it you know why her winning that hand had nothing to do with skill and was a pure gamble.
It has nothing to do with their gender.
The whole thing definitely belongs in here for several reasons.
- 11,009
- 16,903
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2010
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
I read and watched videos trying to understand the outrage over what happened in the poker vid.
And the outrage comes off as kinda silly as hell to me.
Even if people didn't like her "gambling" (which just sounds silly to me because they are literally gambling) some dudes so worked up about it, I start to suspect some sexism is fueling some of the anger.
Unless people can prove she cheated, so what if she got lucky?
And the outrage comes off as kinda silly as hell to me.
Even if people didn't like her "gambling" (which just sounds silly to me because they are literally gambling) some dudes so worked up about it, I start to suspect some sexism is fueling some of the anger.
Unless people can prove she cheated, so what if she got lucky?
Last edited:
RustyShackleford
Supporter
- 64,964
- 196,091
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
That analogy does not make sense, like statistical sense.
Last edited:
