- 14,244
- 5,474
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2007
double
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Man, that's the first thiing I thought of when I watching the news and saw the cabin on fire.
On another note, I'm out of the loop, last time I checked the news was around midnight last nite Pacific Time.
Oh ok.Im not about to go back a bunch of pages, so can somebody just answer the following, was the charred body found a women? No sign of Dorner?
You're kidding right? that pic was shopped and had misspellings
Not a fan of the shirt, but info on the chick in the avy!i'd buy this.
and the LAPD aren't cowards? they kill innocent all day. they ruin families for decades. their only hope to get out of the hood. but when a cop dies he gets a foundation and donation under his name. oh and a plaque on a wall.
but according to your logic, a cops family is more important. they should be put into hiding because ONE man has a vendetta
The military kills innocent peopleI was using your post as an example showing the extent people like yourself are going to to validate Dorner. Wasn't looking for a reply from you.
Coward? Coward's kill innocent people. AKA the dude you've been fappin to since this story broke.
When did I say a cop's family is more important than an average Joe's?
If that were the case, I'd be admitting that police families are more important than my own
If you're gonna debate, at least don't twist words intentionally. I've already stated at least 5 or 6 times that killing innocent people is low. Doesn't matter who kills and it doesn't matter who's killed. Dorner, Columbine shooters, Sandy Hook shooter... they're all the same type of scumbag in my book.
first of all you first said, 'oh i guess i have to pick sides' then you say i chose sides long time ago.
second, you nullify chris' purpose because he killed 'innocent people. what you fail to understand because you are not from here, you don't know how the LAPD operates on the street
you are inadvertently stating that because now chris is a scum bag because he killed a family member of the cops. had he killed a no body, then this would be nothing. you would not even know about it.
since they are all scumbags, why is that chris was burned down in a house? yet james holmes was taken into custody after killing and injuring over 70 INNOCENT people? why is it when a minority goes gun crazy, he is a menace, but when a white person does it, he is mentally ill and has the right to a fair trial ?
Just admit yall was too scared to go in and get himSheriff's Dept "we did not intentionally burn down the cabin"
Quote:
Originally Posted by CelticsFan9783 View Post
Just murk the dude and bounce. No burial. Just let the coyotes have a feast. smokin.gif
so much for not choosing sides
so much for not choosing sides
No I didn't. I said people shouldn't be choosing sides. Dorner can be wrong. The crooked LAPD can be wrong. There doesn't have to be a moral "winner." You make it sound like because I'm against Dorner, I'm siding with corrupt LAPD cops. That's fallacious reasoning on many levels.
Again, no. I never condemned his purpose. I condemned HIM. I understand why he flew off the handle. Doesn't justify his actions. LAPD should be addressed as a separate issue.
A double homicide involving a college basketball coach and her fiancee would be "nothing?" Not sure I believe that.
Cho was a minority. After Virginia Tech, the media portrayed him as mentally ill. They even went so far as to release his mental health records showing he was in a psych ward and was being seen by mental health professionals. So there goes that theory.
And I don't need to go to LA to learn about the cop culture there. I studied it and had professors that were ex-NYPD that quit the force because of what was going on in the 80's with Diallo, Bernard Goetz, etc. And I didn't need them to tell me that cops are just as flawed as ordinary people and can be driven to immorality. I've seen it firsthand.
so much for not choosing sides
he played an eye for an eye because he went through the proper channels and was left with being label a outkast.
So am I reading these chapters right? Son went on a killing spree because he tried to tell on a female officer who he says kicked a suspect?
Is this what this is all about?
...and that granted him a license to kill.
That's your thought process, correct?
You spelled outcast wrong, by the way.
correct and incorrect. if you were stripped of your career because your 'fellow' comrade lied to give advantage to your boss (in the same field) how would you react?
he played an eye for an eye because he went through the proper channels and was left with being label a outkast.
...and that granted him a license to kill.
That's your thought process, correct?
You spelled outcast wrong, by the way.