- 3,023
- 123
- Joined
- Nov 27, 2007
Wow these people are straight up DUMB.Originally Posted by kmstivers21
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/999596/http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/999596/
Sarah Palin is Obama's VP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: this_feature_currently_requires_accessing_site_using_safari
Wow these people are straight up DUMB.Originally Posted by kmstivers21
http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/999596/http://www.ebaumsworld.com/video/watch/999596/
Originally Posted by Essential1
You don't vote just on what benefits you, you also have to take into account what benefits the country as a whole because what affects others affects you.
[h1]PA Voter Registration Surpasses 8.75 Million, Sets New Record[/h1]
Last update: 2:18 p.m. EST Nov. 3, 2008
HARRISBURG, Pa., Nov 03, 2008 /PRNewswire-USNewswire via COMTEX/ -- Department of State Urges Voters to Prepare for Tuesday, Vote During Off-Peak Times to Avoid Long Lines
A record-setting 8,758,031 Pennsylvanians are registered to vote at one of the state's more than 9,300 polling places in tomorrow's General Election, Secretary of the Commonwealth Pedro A. Cortes said today as he urged those going to the polls to prepare and vote during off-peak times to avoid long lines.
The Pennsylvania Department of State estimates that up to 80 percent of those registered to vote will cast a ballot tomorrow. With such a large turnout anticipated, Cortes said adequate preparation by voters and, when possible, going to the polls between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. and between 1 p.m. and 4 p.m. will help ensure a smooth election with minimal wait.
EDITOR'S NOTE: Additional final voter registration statistics follow that reflect the period between Jan. 1 and Nov. 3, 2008.
* 8,758,031 total registered voters:
-- 4,480,691 registered as Democrats
-- 3,243,391 registered as Republicans
NOTE: According to the U.S. Census Bureau, Pennsylvania's 2007 voting age population is 9,646,036.
* 712,925 approved new voter applications were processed since January 2008:
-- 427,479 registered as Democrats
-- 144,118 registered as Republicans
So racist and sexist?Originally Posted by wawaweewa
We're going to become a Banana republic.
This is why the right to vote was very limited at first. It wasn't only slaves who weren't allowed to vote (obviously). So people could save that "you're racist" argument.
It wasn't only slaves or women who weren't allowed to vote. So folks could save that "racist and sexist" argument.Originally Posted by SFN 155
So racist and sexist?Originally Posted by wawaweewa
We're going to become a Banana republic.
This is why the right to vote was very limited at first. It wasn't only slaves who weren't allowed to vote (obviously). So people could save that "you're racist" argument.
I'm not saying that we should go back to 18th or19th century or mid early-mid 20th century standards but there should be more of a standard than simply being a citizen (natural born or naturalized).
So what should the new criteria be then??
Originally Posted by wawaweewa
It wasn't only slaves or women who weren't allowed to vote. So folks could save that "racist and sexist" argument.Originally Posted by SFN 155
So racist and sexist?Originally Posted by wawaweewa
We're going to become a Banana republic.
This is why the right to vote was very limited at first. It wasn't only slaves who weren't allowed to vote (obviously). So people could save that "you're racist" argument.
I'm not saying that we should go back to 18th or19th century or mid early-mid 20th century standards but there should be more of a standard than simply being a citizen (natural born or naturalized).
Originally Posted by Deuce King
I'm not saying that we should go back to 18th or19th century or mid early-mid 20th century standards but there should be more of a standard than simply being a citizen (natural born or naturalized).
Elections that have been spectacles (for some time now) are pathetic too.Originally Posted by SFN 155
Originally Posted by wawaweewa
It wasn't only slaves or women who weren't allowed to vote. So folks could save that "racist and sexist" argument.Originally Posted by SFN 155
So racist and sexist?Originally Posted by wawaweewa
We're going to become a Banana republic.
This is why the right to vote was very limited at first. It wasn't only slaves who weren't allowed to vote (obviously). So people could save that "you're racist" argument.
I'm not saying that we should go back to 18th or19th century or mid early-mid 20th century standards but there should be more of a standard than simply being a citizen (natural born or naturalized).
What? How about only college educated? How about only those who can pay a fee to vote? Pathetic.
u kidding me right?
Uh no.
There were voting restrictions in Ancient Greece. This isn't a racist thing. History goes back further than the founding of America.
but there should be more of a standard than simply being a citizen (natural born or naturalized).
u kidding me right?
Uh no.Originally Posted by wawaweewa
Elections that have been spectacles (for some time now) are pathetic too.Originally Posted by SFN 155
Originally Posted by wawaweewa
It wasn't only slaves or women who weren't allowed to vote. So folks could save that "racist and sexist" argument.Originally Posted by SFN 155
So racist and sexist?Originally Posted by wawaweewa
We're going to become a Banana republic.
This is why the right to vote was very limited at first. It wasn't only slaves who weren't allowed to vote (obviously). So people could save that "you're racist" argument.
I'm not saying that we should go back to 18th or19th century or mid early-mid 20th century standards but there should be more of a standard than simply being a citizen (natural born or naturalized).
What? How about only college educated? How about only those who can pay a fee to vote? Pathetic.
u kidding me right?
Originally Posted by kix4kix
Uh no.Originally Posted by wawaweewa
Elections that have been spectacles (for some time now) are pathetic too.Originally Posted by SFN 155
Originally Posted by wawaweewa
It wasn't only slaves or women who weren't allowed to vote. So folks could save that "racist and sexist" argument.Originally Posted by SFN 155
So racist and sexist?Originally Posted by wawaweewa
We're going to become a Banana republic.
This is why the right to vote was very limited at first. It wasn't only slaves who weren't allowed to vote (obviously). So people could save that "you're racist" argument.
I'm not saying that we should go back to 18th or19th century or mid early-mid 20th century standards but there should be more of a standard than simply being a citizen (natural born or naturalized).
What? How about only college educated? How about only those who can pay a fee to vote? Pathetic.
u kidding me right?
Uh no.Originally Posted by wawaweewa
Elections that have been spectacles (for some time now) are pathetic too.Originally Posted by SFN 155
Originally Posted by wawaweewa
It wasn't only slaves or women who weren't allowed to vote. So folks could save that "racist and sexist" argument.Originally Posted by SFN 155
So racist and sexist?Originally Posted by wawaweewa
We're going to become a Banana republic.
This is why the right to vote was very limited at first. It wasn't only slaves who weren't allowed to vote (obviously). So people could save that "you're racist" argument.
I'm not saying that we should go back to 18th or19th century or mid early-mid 20th century standards but there should be more of a standard than simply being a citizen (natural born or naturalized).
What? How about only college educated? How about only those who can pay a fee to vote? Pathetic.
u kidding me right?
im sitting with 3 people right now who are voting for obama and the first thing out there mouth when i asked them why was "change" ... LOLOLOLOLOL
go to any affluent suburban area and i can find you 10 mccain supporters who dont know a damn thing about his policies
as a citizen of the U.S you are an adult at the age of 18. that gives you many rights. the right to work as a fulltime employee etc...so why wouldnt you havethe right to vote..im not seeing the point guys. who are you to criticize someones reasoning for a vote..who knows what they have been through
And there was slavery in ancient Greece. Are you for that as well?Originally Posted by SFN 155
Uh no.Originally Posted by wawaweewa
Elections that have been spectacles (for some time now) are pathetic too.Originally Posted by SFN 155
Originally Posted by wawaweewa
It wasn't only slaves or women who weren't allowed to vote. So folks could save that "racist and sexist" argument.Originally Posted by SFN 155
So racist and sexist?Originally Posted by wawaweewa
We're going to become a Banana republic.
This is why the right to vote was very limited at first. It wasn't only slaves who weren't allowed to vote (obviously). So people could save that "you're racist" argument.
I'm not saying that we should go back to 18th or19th century or mid early-mid 20th century standards but there should be more of a standard than simply being a citizen (natural born or naturalized).
What? How about only college educated? How about only those who can pay a fee to vote? Pathetic.
u kidding me right?
There were voting restrictions in Ancient Greece. This isn't a racist thing. History goes back further than the founding of America.
Originally Posted by solnevins
wow...yall some elitist bastards..
what the hell makes you think you are more qualified to vote because youre college educated..thats dumb..the average american doesnt even have a college degree so its dumb to not have them participate. they will be the ones most effected in the long term.
we all have our reasons for voting for barack or for mccain..but you cant chastize someones reasoning.its their personal right to vote for someone for whatever reason they want. they already exclude ppl with felonies which in my opinion is ******ed..our prison system is meant to rehilbilitate however the right to vote is taken away from you as soon as you hit the streets
Originally Posted by MarleysProtege
i agree ... just because youre 18 and a citizen shouldnt give you the right to vote ... i dont know what the alternative can be, but there is going to be hundreds of thousands voters this year who dont know a damn thing about politics and just voting because obama is black (either for or against him) im sitting with 3 people right now who are voting for obama and the first thing out there mouth when i asked them why was "change" ... LOLOLOLOLOL
Originally Posted by eNPHAN
lol@since a black nominee is going to win, NOW theres an outcry to need criteria other than being "american" to vote.
stop being salty.
all american citizens of age are allowed to vote.
stop your whining.
Why are people less mind +#*++! and brainwashed in totalitarian states? Is there a positive relationship between being mind +#*++! and having the right to vote?
thats an obvious positive correlation between thinking you have the ability to be apart of change and voting. i dont disagree with that. what idisagree with is ragging on someones reasoning behind voting for a specific candidate, and their "qualifications". Morally and ethically that iswrong unless of course they are racist and voting for mccain simply becuse barack is black.
already ready for the "Oh.. is it because obama is black?" arguments for the next 4 years.
im ready for the" impeach him" because he isnt turning things around in 2 years argument from whites and black