Death of World Star Hip Hop (D.O.WSHH)

[iYen]

Worldstar is proof that they should have never gave black people camera phones.....This is coming from a person with very little grasp of logic  black man......

fixed

 

[hennessy]

I like the saxaphone riff at the end of the childish gambino song.

 

[gatorbeltsnpattiemelts]

Nah he ain't just compare himself to Eminem tho....

 

[jaysrcrak]

13 pgs and that's all ppl have been saying? Nah.

So wshh is a problem and?

I think you should read through this thread when ppl say wshh isn't the main problem or anything along those lines and the reply from other ppl that can only specifically focus on wshh. Cuz I've seen nonsense from wshh being compared to child porn to ppl holding a website responsible for how the youth are raised.

I'm simply not buying all that extra bull ****.

Nobody compared it to child porn. YOU misunderstood what dude said.
He used the fact that child porn has been featured on the site(FACT) to support his statement that the site features illegal activities.
And that featuring those illegal activities is destructive and irresponsible on their part. After already stating several times that he does not blame WSHH solely
Then you came in and said that you cant compare fights on WSHH to child porn which is not what he did in the first place.

 

[miketysonthekiller]

I like how this thread went from people saying that WSHH showecased black people in a bad light and it only promoted violent behavior

to

CP being in the same light as people fighting.

This whole argument went 180 with the CP. Some of you dudes just can't stick to your arguments and you have to bring up extremes to try and solidify your point when those were never part of the discussion

anything to gain some leverage.

 

[tromps]

World star is the CNN to the hood for real, I never saw it that way.

 

[jaysrcrak]

^^It went from WSHH showcases people in a bad light with the ignorant behavior it shows. It wasnt JUST the violence.

And the whole CP came into the argument when ReggieKILLER mentioned that murders have been posted on WSHH, and that those types of things along with child molestation shouldnt be shown. Then OP tryed to used that to support his argument that "if you dont like it dont watch it" is a not a valid rebuttal, to the fact that WSHH has featured questionable content. Yaw so caught up on semantics that you didnt even understand what dude was sayin.

 

[alp]

^^It went from WSHH showcases people in a bad light with the ignorant behavior it shows. It wasnt JUST the violence.

And the whole CP came into the argument when ReggieKILLER mentioned that murders have been posted on WSHH, and that those types of things along with child molestation shouldnt be shown. Then OP tryed to used that to support his argument that "if you dont like it dont watch it" is a not a valid rebuttal, to the fact that WSHH has featured questionable content. Yaw so caught up on semantics that you didnt even understand what dude was sayin.

those things can be thrown up on YouTube also. I'm guessin that they removed those videos off the site somewhat quickly.

 

[Master Zik]

13 pgs and that's all ppl have been saying? Nah.

So wshh is a problem and?

I think you should read through this thread when ppl say wshh isn't the main problem or anything along those lines and the reply from other ppl that can only specifically focus on wshh. Cuz I've seen nonsense from wshh being compared to child porn to ppl holding a website responsible for how the youth are raised.

I'm simply not buying all that extra bull ****.

Nobody compared it to child porn. YOU misunderstood what dude said.
He used the fact that child porn has been featured on the site(FACT) to support his statement that the site features illegal activities.
And that featuring those illegal activities is destructive and irresponsible on their part. After already stating several times that he does not blame WSHH solely
Then you came in and said that you cant compare fights on WSHH to child porn which is not what he did in the first place.

No he did not. Go back and read his post. If I somehow misunderstood what he said everybody else that replied similarly misunderstood. Most importantly even he never made that correction when everybody replied to him about what a stupid overexaggerrated comparison that is. He was not talking about child porn being featured on wshh AT ALL.

Somebody else brought up that wshh had cp on it not the person that made the comparison. It's only after cp being on wshh was brought up did dude jump to another argument to talk about wshh having cp on it.

Miss me with that revisionist history when that argument is only like 5 pgs old. You need to read the thread and get it right. If you want to keep explaining his posts for him please go ahead then.


Before this post CP was not compared to what wshh does and this is what dude says

a lot of people saying "if you remove wshh, other website will just come take its place".
this is such a lazy way to look at the situation.

just because there is an audience for something does not mean that there should be a platform for them to congregate.
for those of you who disagree, do you believe child pornography websites should be allowed on the internet? there's obviously an audience and its similar in that they both contain media of crimes being committed.

i mean, if you're not into child pornography just dont click on it right?

and this is what you're saying he meant

YOU misunderstood what dude said.
He used the fact that child porn has been featured on the site(FACT) to support his statement that the site features illegal activities.
And that featuring those illegal activities is destructive and irresponsible on their part.

His core argument is literally that there should not be a site for certain things that will have an audience in opposition to the solution of don't like it don't click on it. He then makes the example of basically saying there's an audience for child pornography and child porn sites. In his attempt to show that don't like it don't click on it doesn't work he tries to apply that to child porn on the internet. He did not say ANYTHING about child porn being on wshh until someone else mentioned it later.

Also this whole filming fights is a crime so the comparison works is more bull ****. Filming a fight is not in the same category as filming the sexual abuse of children.

You're wrong jaysrcrak

reggiekiller and @derryj3 back and forth is a whole different silly argument where dude somehow thinks the rape of his mother on video can benefit others who see it and a dude against the distribution of rape and murder vids. That argument does not some how lead to comparing cp on the internet to the majority of what wshh has on their site.

It was a dumb comparison, simple as that. Trying to duck and dodge at this point is pitiful.

 

[AEA18]

^^It went from WSHH showcases people in a bad light with the ignorant behavior it shows. It wasnt JUST the violence.

And the whole CP came into the argument when ReggieKILLER mentioned that murders have been posted on WSHH, and that those types of things along with child molestation shouldnt be shown. Then OP tryed to used that to support his argument that "if you dont like it dont watch it" is a not a valid rebuttal, to the fact that WSHH has featured questionable content. Yaw so caught up on semantics that you didnt even understand what dude was sayin.

those things can be thrown up on YouTube also. I'm guessin that they removed those videos off the site somewhat quickly.

Difference between youtube and WSHH is anyone can upload to youtube and the video will not be deleted until someone flags it.

WSHH someone that works for the site has to choose to upload the video.

 

[reggiekiller]

Also this whole filming fights is a crime so the comparison works is more bull ****. Filming a fight is not in the same category as filming the sexual abuse of children.

But sexual situations involving children have been filmed and put on there.  I know you didnt know this at first, but its happened on a couple occasions on there, its horrible.  And I doubt that the website would ever be shut down, similarly to the occasion when a video of a man forcing a toddler to provide him with oral sex on camera was circulated through facebook for over a week.  FB never got shut down, and I dont think the "well they took the video down" argument is plausible in this situation.  All that argument does is tell people "It can be up here, but for an extremely limited time"


And we need some rephrasing in that last quote lol.  @derryj3  is the one who thinks that video taping his mom getting raped could be a good thing.  I want nothing to do with it lol 

Atleast we know @Master Zik   is paying attention, if noone else is

 

[DrizzyNYC]

Difference between youtube and WSHH is anyone can upload to youtube and the video will not be deleted until someone flags it.

WSHH someone that works for the site has to choose to upload the video.

Dray here
Bingo, someone sees the outrageous content and makes the decision to upload the outrageousness content

 

[Master Zik]

You're wrong [@=https://niketalk.com/members/43278"well they took the video down" argument is plausible in this situation.  All that argument does is tell people "It can be up here, but for an extremely limited time"



And we need some rephrasing in that last quote lol.  @derryj3
 is the one who thinks that video taping his mom getting raped could be a good thing.  I want nothing to do with it lol :\

Atleast we know @Master Zik
  is paying attention, if noone else is

Well yeah, when it was brought up to me that specifically cp has circulated on wshh I addressed that. I was just dealing with one argument that went on here that had nothing to do with that.

My bad, I didn't mean to make it seem like you were the one down with that weird logic. I knew who said what I just didn't word it accordingly.

As far as sites being shut down (cuz I too remember a pic of sexual child abuse being on FB and for some dumb reason I had the idiotic friends that just constantly shared it) I don't know the FBI's protocol for cp on sites that aren't solely sites just for cp. I imagine lawyers involved made a good enough argument. It aint right and should be fixed but that does raise the question of should FB be shutdown for a member breaking the law like that (I assume the member got banned from FB). so as it pertains to wshh, I'm not clear on the process of uploading a vid there or if it is just submissions and somebody (or a group) is actually viewing all of these vids before they post it on the site.